Complications of transvaginal ultrasound-directed follicle aspiration: A review of 2670 consecutive procedures

In: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · 1993 · vol. 10(1) , pp. 72–77 · doi:10.1007/bf01204444 · PMID:8499683 · W2051976349
review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 24 in-corpus citations
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-07

This review of 2670 transvaginal ultrasound-directed follicle aspirations found vaginal hemorrhage in 8.6%, pelvic infection in 0.6%, and rare instances of ovarian hemorrhage and pelvic hematoma.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This paper is a prospective review of complications from 2670 consecutive transvaginal ultrasound-directed follicle aspiration procedures over 4 years, reporting incidence and outcomes of adverse events. Vaginal hemorrhage occurred in 8.6% of cases, with >100 ml blood loss in 0.8%, and postoperative pelvic infection occurred in 0.6%, including 9 severe infections with pelvic abscess; microbiology suggested direct inoculation of vaginal organisms into the peritoneal cavity via the needle as a likely route. Major but rare events included two cases of ovarian hemorrhage with hemoperitoneum (one requiring emergency laparotomy) and one iliac-vessel puncture hematoma that resolved without intervention. The authors conclude the low pelvic infection incidence questions prophylactic antibiotics and note no increased infection risk with preexisting peritoneal damage, but the study does not provide an explicit control for antibiotic use beyond this observational inference. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (10)

Cited by (24)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK