A 2 year histopathological audit for non-oncological hysterectomies in a tertiary care hospital

In: International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2017 · vol. 6(8) , pp. 3260 · doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20173145 · W2731700951
article OA: diamond CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-25

This two-year audit of non-oncological hysterectomies found that symptomatic fibroids were the most common indication, with adenomyosis listed as a key surgical target, while approximately half of specimens lacked identified pathology.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-11 · read from full text

This two-year retrospective audit evaluated the correlation between preoperative diagnoses and final histopathological findings for non-oncological hysterectomies at a tertiary care hospital. The study analyzed consecutive specimens, excluding confirmed malignancies, to assess surgical indications such as symptomatic fibroids, prolapse, and obstetric causes. Results indicated that while symptomatic fibroid uterus was the most common indication, approximately half of all hysterectomy specimens revealed no identifiable pathology on histological examination. Relevance to endometriosis: adenomyosis is listed in the background as one of the diseases treated by hysterectomy, though the paper's main focus is a general audit of surgical indications rather than specific analysis of endometriosis or adenomyosis pathology.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Hysterectomy is the most common gynecological surgery in the world and is considered to be the most definitive treatment option for various diseases like DUB (dysfunctional uterine bleeding), leiomyoma, adenomyosis, chronic pelvic pain, prolapse, and malignancy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the surgical indications, routes of surgery and the correlation between preoperative diagnosis and histopathological examination of hysterectomy specimensMethods: This was a retrospective audit. The pre-operative diagnosis and histopathologic data of all consecutive specimens of hysterectomies were collected and analysed. Those with confirmed malignancy before operation were excluded. All elective as well as emergency hysterectomies (including obstetric hysterectomies) were analyzed. Preoperative indications were compared with the final histopathological report.Results: Most common indication for hysterectomy was symptomatic fibroid uterus followed by utero-vaginal prolapse and obstetric causes. Overall, there was no pathology identified in approximately 50% of all hysterectomies received in our department.Conclusions: Proper audit and review can help in improving the quality of health care in our country. The results of our study may help to reduce inappropriate indications for hysterectomy.
Full text 3,968 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Background

Hysterectomy is the most common gynecological surgery in the world and is considered to be the most definitive treatment option for various diseases like DUB (dysfunctional uterine bleeding), leiomyoma, adenomyosis, chronic pelvic pain, prolapse, and malignancy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the surgical indications, routes of surgery and the correlation between preoperative diagnosis and histopathological examination of hysterectomy specimens

Methods

This was a retrospective audit. The pre-operative diagnosis and histopathologic data of all consecutive specimens of hysterectomies were collected and analysed. Those with confirmed malignancy before operation were excluded. All elective as well as emergency hysterectomies (including obstetric hysterectomies) were analyzed. Preoperative indications were compared with the final histopathological report.

Results

Most common indication for hysterectomy was symptomatic fibroid uterus followed by utero-vaginal prolapse and obstetric causes. Overall, there was no pathology identified in approximately 50% of all hysterectomies received in our department.

Conclusions

Proper audit and review can help in improving the quality of health care in our country. The results of our study may help to reduce inappropriate indications for hysterectomy. Metrics

References

Gupta G, Kotasthane DS, Kotasthane VD. Hysterectomy: a clinico-pathological correlation of 500 cases. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009;14(1):1-5 Magon N, Chahuan M. Editorial. Subtotal Hysterectomy: has it come a full circle?. Int J Clin Cases Investigations. 2012;4:1-4. Broder MS, Kanouse DE, Mittman BS, Bernstein SJ. The appropriateness of recommendations for hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(2):199-205. Bhattacharya S, Middleton LJ, Tsourapas A, Lee AJ, Champaneria R, Daniels JP, et al. Hysterectomy, endometrial ablation and Mirena® for heavy menstrual bleeding: A systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2011;15:1-252. Bala R, Devi KP, Singh CM. Trend of hysterectomy: A retrospective analysis in Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS). J Med Soc. 2015;29:4-7. Aksu F, Gezer A, Oral E. Seventeen-year review of hysterectomy procedures in a university clinic in Istanbul 1985-2001. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2004;270(4):217-22. Pandey D, Sehgal K, Saxena A, Hebbar S, Nambiar J, Bhat RG. An audit of indications, complications, and justification of hysterectomies at a teaching hospital in India. Int J Reprod Med. 2014;2014. Leung PL, Tsang SW, Yuen PM. An audit on hysterectomy for benign diseases in public hospitals in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2007;13(3):187-93. Sucheta KL, Manangi M, Madhu KP, Arun BJ, Nagaraj N. Hysterectomy: clinical profile, indications and postoperative complications. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:2093-6. Shaikh TA, Memon F, Memon Z. Hysterectomies; an audit at a tertiary care hospital. Professional Med J. 2011;18(1). Juneja SK, Tandon P, Mohan B, Kaushal S. A change in the management of intractable obstetrical hemorrhage over 15 years in a tertiary care center. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2014;4(Suppl 1):S17-S19. Bodelon C, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Schiff MA, Reed SD. Factors associated with peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(1):115-23. Nwobodo E, Nnadi D. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy in a tertiary hospital in sokoto, Nigeria. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2012;2(1):37-40. Shirodker SD, Pandey A, Yadav S. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy: review at a tertiary care hospital. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:3811-4. Tiwana KK, Nibhoria S, Monga T, Phutela R. Histopathological audit of 373 nononcological hysterectomies in a teaching hospital. Pathol Res Int. 2014;2014.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosischronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (2)

Cited by (2)

References (14)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK