Abdominal hysterectomy: analysis of clinico-histopathological correlation in Western Rajasthan, India

In: International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2017 · vol. 6(3) , pp. 1012 · doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20170575 · W2588213963
article OA: diamond CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-12

This study analyzed 105 abdominal hysterectomy cases, finding a high correlation between clinical and histopathological diagnoses, particularly for fibroids and adenomyosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-12 · read from full text

This retrospective, longitudinal study from UMAID Hospital in Western Rajasthan analyzed clinico-histopathological correlations in 105 women undergoing planned abdominal hysterectomy (October 2014 to March 2015), comparing demographic/clinical diagnoses with histopathology of saved hysterectomy specimens. Most patients were 41–50 years old and multiparous, and the most common preoperative clinical diagnosis was leiomyoma uterus (48.57%), with leiomyoma also being the most frequent confirmed pathology (50.48%). Adenomyosis was the second most common pathology (21.90%), and histopathological confirmation rates were reported as 89% for malignancy, 96% for fibroids, and 100% for adenomyosis and pelvic inflammatory disease. This paper is centrally about endometriosis and adenomyosis — adenomyosis is among the key histopathology findings and is specifically evaluated for clinicopathological confirmation.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Hysterectomy is the most common gynecological surgery done in the females worldwide as it provides definitive cure to a wide range of gynecological diseases, both benign and malignant. The indications to perform this major surgery should always be justified and the pathology should be proved histopathologically. Histopathological analysis and review is mandatory to evaluate the appropriateness of the hysterectomy.Methods: A retrospective, longitudinal study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UMAID Hospital, Dr. S.N. M.C. Jodhpur (Raj.) during October 2014 to March 2015.Total 105 cases were studied during this period. The study included all women undergoing planned abdominal hysterectomy. Data was recorded on proformas, including demographic characteristics and clinical features. Hysterectomy specimens were saved in 10% formalin and sent to the Department of Pathology. Histopathology reports were analyzed and compared with the indications of surgery to draw various informative conclusions.Results: Of 105 cases, 55(52.38%) were in the age group of 41 – 50, which comprised the commonest age group undergoing the surgery. Maximum women (95%) those underwent hysterectomy were multiparous. Most common preoperatively clinical diagnosis was leiomyoma uterus which was diagnosed clinically and sonographically in 51(48.57%) cases. On Histopathological examination, the commonest pathology, similar to clinical impression, was found to be Leiomyoma at 50.48% (n = 53). Adenomyosis (21.90%) was detected as Second most common pathology. Histopathological confirmation of pre-operative diagnosis was 89% for malignancy, 96% for fibroids, 100% for adenomyosis, 100% for pelvic inflammatory disease.Conclusions: There was a high correlation when the clinical diagnosis was a fibroid, adenomyosis and ovarian mass. Every hysterectomy specimen should be subjected to histopathological examination because it is mandatory for conforming diagnosis and ensuring optimal management, in particular of malignant disease.
Full text 4,647 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Background

Hysterectomy is the most common gynecological surgery done in the females worldwide as it provides definitive cure to a wide range of gynecological diseases, both benign and malignant. The indications to perform this major surgery should always be justified and the pathology should be proved histopathologically. Histopathological analysis and review is mandatory to evaluate the appropriateness of the hysterectomy.

Methods

A retrospective, longitudinal study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UMAID Hospital, Dr. S.N. M.C. Jodhpur (Raj.) during October 2014 to March 2015.Total 105 cases were studied during this period. The study included all women undergoing planned abdominal hysterectomy. Data was recorded on proformas, including demographic characteristics and clinical features. Hysterectomy specimens were saved in 10% formalin and sent to the Department of Pathology. Histopathology reports were analyzed and compared with the indications of surgery to draw various informative conclusions.

Results

Of 105 cases, 55(52.38%) were in the age group of 41 – 50, which comprised the commonest age group undergoing the surgery. Maximum women (95%) those underwent hysterectomy were multiparous. Most common preoperatively clinical diagnosis was leiomyoma uterus which was diagnosed clinically and sonographically in 51(48.57%) cases. On Histopathological examination, the commonest pathology, similar to clinical impression, was found to be Leiomyoma at 50.48% (n = 53). Adenomyosis (21.90%) was detected as Second most common pathology. Histopathological confirmation of pre-operative diagnosis was 89% for malignancy, 96% for fibroids, 100% for adenomyosis, 100% for pelvic inflammatory disease.

Conclusions

There was a high correlation when the clinical diagnosis was a fibroid, adenomyosis and ovarian mass. Every hysterectomy specimen should be subjected to histopathological examination because it is mandatory for conforming diagnosis and ensuring optimal management, in particular of malignant disease.Metrics

References

Graves EJ. National Centre for Health Statistics, National hospital discharge survey: annual summary, 1990.Viral health stat (13). 1992:112. DHHS publication PHS 92-1773. Begum J, Talukder SI, Hossain MA. A two years audit of complications of total abdominal hysterectomy at Dinajpur Medical College Hospital Dinajpur. Med Col J. 2008;1(1):14-7. John A, Rock M D, Jhon D , Thompson MD. Telind’s operative gynaecology. 1st edition Lipincott-Ravenplace. Qamar-ur-Nisa. Hysterectomies, an audit at a tertiary care hospital. Professional Med J 2011;18(1):45-50. Ramachandran T, Sinha P, Subramanium. Correlation between clinicopathological and ultrasonographical findings in hysterectomy. J Clinic Diagno Res. 2011;5(4):737-40. Gupta G, Kotasthane D, Kotasthane V. Hysterectomy: A clinocopathological correlation of 500 cases. Internet J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;14:1-5. Ranabhat SK, Shreshta R, Tiwari M. A retrospective histopathological study of hysterectomy with or without salphingoophorectomy specimens. Available at www.cmc.edu.np, 24-9. Surti HB, Zaveri P, Shah CK, Shah NR. Clinicopathological study of hysterectomy cases. biennial journal of GAPM ISSN 0975-3109. Jha R, Pant AD, Jha A, Adhikari RC, Syami G. The histopathological analysis of hysterectomy specimens. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2006;45(163):283-90. Lee NC, Dicker RC, Rubin G, Oray HW. Confirmation of the preoperative diagnosis for hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;150(3):283-7. Shergill SK, Shergill HK, Gupta M, Kaur S. Clinicopathological study of hysterectomies. J Indian Med Assoc. 2002;100(4):238-9. Adelusola KA, Ogunniyi SO. Hysterectomies in Nigerians; histopathological analysis of cases seen in Ile-Ife. Niger postgrad med J. 2001;8:37-40. Pokras R, Hufnagel VG. Hysterectomy in the United States, 1965-1984. AJPH1988;78:852. Nausheen F, Iqbal J, Bhatti FA, Khan AT, Sheikh S. Hysterectomy: the patient’s perspective. Ann Gyne. 2004;10:339-41. Tiwana KK, Nibhoria S, Monga T, Phutela R. Histopathological Audit of 373 nononcological hysterectomies in a teaching hospital. Patholog Res Int. 2014;2014:468715. Siwatch S, Kundu R, Mohan H, Huria A. Histopathological audit of hysterectomy specimen in a tertiary care hospital. Sri Lanka J Obst Gynae. 2012;34:155-8. Miller NF. Hysterectomy: therapeutic necessity or surgical racket? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1946;51:804.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (4)

Cited by (2)

References (8)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK