Visual inspection of transvaginal ultrasound videos to characterize uterine peristalsis: an inter-observer agreement study

In: Journal of Ultrasound · 2019 · vol. 23(1) , pp. 37–44 · doi:10.1007/s40477-018-00356-z · PMID:30771103 · W2913878103
article OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 6 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-07

This study assessed inter-observer agreement in characterizing uterine peristalsis from transvaginal ultrasound videos, finding substantial agreement for contraction frequency but only fair agreement for direction, timing, and quality.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

The study evaluated how reproducibly observers can characterize non-pregnant uterine peristalsis from transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) videos by visually rating video quality and contraction frequency, direction, and timing, using 80 videos assessed by six observers. Inter-observer agreement was quantified with Fleiss’ kappa and intra-class correlation, and one observer also measured operating time. Contraction frequency showed substantial agreement (ICC = 0.68), whereas timing, direction, and video quality had only slight-to-fair agreement (ICC = 0.26; κ = 0.17 and 0.16), with higher agreement for technical engineers than medical professionals, and agreement varying with video quality, menstrual cycle phase, and patient. The authors note that analysis time per video (6–20 minutes) is too extensive for daily practice. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper itself does not focus on endometriosis, but it is included in this corpus because uterine peristalsis measures have previously been linked to endometriosis in cited work such as Leyendecker et al., though endometriosis is not the main focus of the present inter-observer agreement study.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 9,245 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 6 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose Contractions in non-pregnant uterine can be assessed by visual inspection of transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS). Many authors have used this method to extract features like contraction frequency and direction. However, visual inspection is a subjective method and the outcome is dependent on the sonographers and video analysts. In this study, we wanted to see which uterine feature is reproducible enough, in terms of inter-observer agreement, to serve as a reliable control for future research.

Methods

Six observers assessed 80 TVUS videos, and rated video quality, contraction frequency, direction and timing. One observer assessed operating time. A Fleiss’ kappa (κ) or an intra-class correlation (ICC) was calculated to determine the inter-observer agreement of all features.

Results

The inter-observer agreement in frequency was substantial (ICC = 0.68). Conversely, there was just slight to fair agreement in contraction timing and direction and in video quality: ICC = 0.26, κ = 0.17 and κ = 0.16, respectively. Overall, agreement among technical engineers was better than between medical professionals. The level of agreement was correlated with video quality, phase of the menstrual cycle and individual patient (all χ2 with p < 0.00). The time to analyze one video ranged between 6 and 20 min.

Conclusions

This study shows that visual inspection of TVUS videos is a fairly reproducible method to assess contraction frequency. However, the operating time is too extensive to implement this method in daily practice. Automated methods could offer a solution for this problem in the future. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Dickinson R (1937) The technic of timing human ovulation by palpable changes in ovary, tube, and uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 33:1027–1033 Bulletti C, De ZD, Polli V et al (2000) Uterine contractility during the menstrual cycle. HumReprod 15(Suppl 1):81–89 Martinez-Gaudio M, Yoshida T, Bengtsson LP (1973) Propagated and nonpropagated myometrial contractions in normal menstrual cycles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 115:107–111 Bulletti C, de Ziegler D (2006) Uterine contractility and embryo implantation. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 18:473–484. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gco.0000233947.97543.c4 Kunz G, Beil D, Deininger H et al (1996) The dynamics of rapid sperm transport through the female genital tract: evidence from vaginal sonography of uterine peristalsis and hysterosalpingoscintigraphy. Hum Reprod 11:627–632 Leyendecker G, Kunz G, Wildt L et al (1996) Uterine hyperperistalsis and dysperistalsis as dysfunctions of the mechanism of rapid sperm transport in patients with endometriosis and infertility. Hum Reprod 11:1542–1551 Kido A, Togashi K, Nakai A et al (2005) Oral contraceptives and uterine peristalsis: evaluation with MRI. J Magn Reson 22:265–270 Kido A, Togashi K, Kataoka ML et al (2008) Intrauterine devices and uterine peristalsis: evaluation with MRI. Magn Reson 26:54–58 Kido A, Ascher SM, Kishimoto K et al (2011) Comparison of uterine peristalsis before and after uterine artery embolization at 3-T MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:1431–1435. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5349 Nakai A, Reinhold C, Noel P et al (2013) Optimizing cine MRI for uterine peristalsis: a comparison of three different single shot fast spin echo techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:161–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.23946 Watanabe K, Kataoka M, Yano K et al (2015) Automated detection and measurement of uterine peristalsis in cine MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging 42:644–650. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24817 Abramowicz JS, Archer DF (1990) Uterine endometrial peristalsis—a transvaginal ultrasound study. Fertil Steril 54:451–454 Chalubinski K, Deutinger J, Bernaschek G (1993) Vaginosonography for recording of cycle-related myometrial contractions. Fertil Steril 59:225–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55644-1 de Vries K, Lyons EA, Ballard G et al (1990) Contractions of the inner third of the myometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:679–682 Fanchin R, Righini C, Olivennes F et al (1998) Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 13:1968–1974 Fanchin R, Ayoubi JM, Olivennes F et al (2000) Hormonal influence on the uterine contractility during ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod 15(Suppl 1):90–100 Fanchin R, Righini C, De ZD et al (2001) Effects of vaginal progesterone administration on uterine contractility at the time of embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 75:1136–1140 Fanchin R, Ayoubi JM, Righini C et al (2001) Uterine contractility decreases at the time of blastocyst transfers. Hum Reprod 16:1115–1119 Fukuda M, Fukuda K (1994) Physiology: uterine endometrial cavity movement and cervical mucus. Hum Reprod 9:1013–1016. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138625 Ijland MM, Evers JL, Dunselman GA et al (1996) Endometrial wavelike movements during the menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril 65:746–749 Ijland MM, Evers JL, Hoogland HJ (1997) Velocity of endometrial wavelike activity in spontaneous cycles. Fertil Steril 68:72–75 Ijland MM, Hoogland HJ, Dunselman GA et al (1999) Endometrial wave direction switch and the outcome of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 71:476–481 Kunz G, Noe M, Herbertz M, Leyendecker G (1998) Uterine peristalsis during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle: effects of oestrogen, antioestrogen and oxytocin. Hum Reprod Update 4:647–654 Leyendecker G, Kunz G, Herbertz M et al (2004) Uterine peristaltic activity and the development of endometriosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1034:338–355 Lyons EA, Taylor PJ, Zheng XH et al (1991) Characterization of subendometrial myometrial contractions throughout the menstrual cycle in normal fertile women. Fertil Steril 55:771–774 Pinto V, Matteo M, Tinelli R et al (2015) Altered uterine contractility in women with chronic endometritis. Fertil Steril 103:1049–1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.01.007 Salamanca A, Beltrán E (1995) Subendometrial contractility in menstrual phase visualized by transvaginal sonography in patients with endometriosis. Fertil Steril 64:193–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57680-8 van Gestel I, Ijland MM, Hoogland HJ, Evers JL (2005) Endometrial waves in in vitro fertilization cycles: a validation study. Fertil Steril 83:491–493 van Gestel I, Ijland MM, Evers JL, Hoogland HJ (2007) Complex endometrial wave-patterns in IVF. Fertil Steril 88:612–615 Zhu L, Li Y, Xu A (2012) Influence of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on uterine peristalsis in infertile women. Hum Reprod 27:2684–2689 Zhu L, Che HS, Xiao L, Li YP (2014) Uterine peristalsis before embryo transfer affects the chance of clinical pregnancy in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod 29:1238–1243. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu058 Ijland MM, Evers JL, Dunselman GA, Hoogland HJ (1996) Subendometrial contractions in the nonpregnant uterus: an ultrasound study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 70:23–24 van Gestel I, Ijland MM, Hoogland HJ, Evers JL (2003) Endometrial wave-like activity in the non-pregnant uterus. Hum Reprod Update 9:131–138 Kuijsters NPM, Methorst WG, Kortenhorst MSQ et al (2017) Uterine peristalsis and fertility: current knowledge and future perspectives: a review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 35:50–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.03.019 Sammali F, Blank C, Xu L et al (2018) Experimental setup for objective evaluation of uterine motion analysis by ultrasound speckle tracking. Biomed Phys Eng Express 4:035012. https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/aab053

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Rudy de Roon, MSc, Michelle Hendrikx, MD, Rogier Wildeboer, MSc, Christina Caresio, PhD and Ruud van Sloun, PhD, for their help as observers and support in software development. Special thanks to Marcel van ‘t Veer, PhD for statistical support. Funding This research was funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NOW) within the TTW domain (applied and technical sciences) in the form of a High Tech Systems and Materials grant (Grant number 13901). Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Ethical approval This research was approved by the medical ethical committee of the Catharina Hospital (MEC-U protocol number NL52466.100.15). Informed consent Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Data availability statement The data sets generated during and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Kuijsters, N.P.M., Sammali, F., Rabotti, C. et al. Visual inspection of transvaginal ultrasound videos to characterize uterine peristalsis: an inter-observer agreement study. J Ultrasound 23, 37–44 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-018-00356-z Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-018-00356-z

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (37)

Cited by (6)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T06:45:02.717393+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK