Multivariate analysis of factors predictive of successful live births in in vitro fertilization (IVF) suggests strategies to improve IVF outcome
This study identified embryo quality and donor insemination as positively correlated with live births, while maternal age was negatively correlated, suggesting embryo transfer adjustments to improve IVF outcomes.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This paper analyzed clinical and embryology variables (maternal age; cause for IVF; donor insemination; attempt rank; day-of hCG serum estradiol and luteinizing hormone; flexible vs rigid catheter; and numbers/quality categories of embryos and cell counts) using logistic regression to identify predictors of pregnancy, live birth, and multiple births in an IVF setting. It found that endometriosis status and certain embryo characteristics (including 2-, 3-, and 4-cell “good” and “excellent” categories) were positively correlated with pregnancy and that specific embryo quality measures plus donor insemination were positively correlated with live births, while maternal age was negatively correlated with live births. The authors’ caveat is that the multivariate associations are tied to the variables modeled and the study design; the paper frames predictive “strategies” as model-based implications rather than a separately tested intervention. Relevance to endometriosis: endometriosis is explicitly reported as positively correlated with pregnancy outcomes in the multivariate analysis, though the paper’s main focus is identifying multivariate predictors of IVF success and their implications for outcomes.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
4,220 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusions
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:10:40.754221+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine