Learning curve for ultrasonographic diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis using structured offline training program
article
OA: bronze
CC0
⤵ 39 in-corpus citations
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the learning curves of trainees during a structured offline/hands-on training program for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). METHODS: Four trainees (all Ob/Gyn postgraduates with at least 5 years' experience in ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology, but with no experience of sonographic examination of DIE) participated in the study. They underwent a 2-week training program with a single trainer. Day 1 was devoted to theoretical issues and guided offline analysis of 10 three-dimensional ultrasound volumes. During the following days, four sessions of real-time sonographic examinations were performed in a DIE referral center ultrasound unit. In between these sessions, the trainees analyzed four datasets offline, each containing 25 volumes. At the end of each set, misinterpreted volumes were reassessed with the trainer. Presence or absence of DIE at surgery was considered the gold standard. The trainees' learning process was evaluated by learning-curve cumulative summation (LC-CUSUM) and the deviations of the trainees' level of performance at the control stage was assessed by CUSUM (standard CUSUM), for different locations of DIE. RESULTS: The trainees reached competence after an average of 17 (range, 14-21) evaluations for bladder, 40 (range, 30-60) for rectosigmoid, 25 (range, 14-34) for forniceal, 44 (range, 25-66) for uterosacral ligament (USL) and 21 (range, 14-43) for rectovaginal septum (RVS) locations of DIE, and then kept the process under control, with error levels of less than 4.5% until the end of the test. The overall accuracy for each trainee in diagnosis of DIE at the different locations ranged from 0.91 to 0.98 for bladder DIE, from 0.80 to 0.94 for rectosigmoid DIE, from 0.90 to 0.94 for forniceal DIE, from 0.79 to 0.82 for USL DIE and from 0.89 to 0.98 for RVS DIE. CONCLUSIONS: The suggested 2-week training program, based on a mixture of offline and live scanning sessions, is feasible and apparently provides effective training for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of DIE. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (18)
- Accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of deep endometriosis in the rectosigmoid: systematic review and meta‐analysis via openalex
- Accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of deep endometriosis in uterosacral ligaments, rectovaginal septum, vagina and bladder: systematic review and meta‐analysis via openalex
- Applying a statistical method in transvaginal ultrasound training: lessons from the learning curve cumulative summation test (LC-CUSUM) for endometriosis mapping via openalex
- Can anyone screen for deep infiltrating endometriosis with transvaginal ultrasound? via openalex
- Diagnosis of deep endometriosis: clinical examination, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and other techniques via openalex
- Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis via openalex
- Interpreting the real-time dynamic ‘sliding sign’ and predicting pouch of Douglas obliteration: an interobserver, intraobserver, diagnostic-accuracy and learning-curve study via openalex
- Learning curve for the detection of pouch of Douglas obliteration and deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum via openalex
- Peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometriosis, and adenomyotic nodules of the rectovaginal septum are three different entities via openalex
- Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group via openalex
- Transvaginal ultrasound <i>vs</i> magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis: systematic review and meta‐analysis via openalex
- W2137722281 via openalex
- W2019805616 via openalex
- W2095544191 via openalex
- W2123319569 via openalex
- W2128837723 via openalex
- W1961511536 via openalex
- W2540731104 via openalex
Cited by (39)
- Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography in Endometriosis 2026
- Structured MRI reporting in patients with deep pelvic endometriosis: performance and clinical impact of the deep pelvic endometriosis index (dPEI) 2026
- Patients with endometriosis in the vagina, bowel, or bladder experience a prolonged diagnostic delay: an observational study 2025
- Transvaginal Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Endometriosis: Current Practices and Barriers in Australian Sonographers 2025
- Best Practices: Ultrasound Versus MRI in the Assessment of Pelvic Endometriosis 2024
- DSOG Guideline Bulletin: Diagnostic approach for patients with endometriosis 2024
- Chronic demyelination interferes with normal spermatogenesis in cuprizone-intoxicant C57/BL 6 mice: An experimental study 2024
- Role of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Endometriosis in Infertile Women: Ovarian Endometrioma, Deep Endometriosis, and Superficial Endometriosis 2024
- Directive clinique no 449 : Directive canadienne sur le diagnostic et les impacts de l’endométriose 2024
- Evaluation of diagnostic value of pelvic MRI in endometriosis in comparison with surgical findings: A cross-sectional study 2024
- Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus on Routine Pelvic US for Endometriosis 2024
- Guideline No. 449: Diagnosis and Impact of Endometriosis – A Canadian Guideline 2024
- Diagnosis of Endometriosis by Transvaginal Ultrasound: An Online Survey of Gynecologists Practising in Greece 2023
- Endometriosis Diagnostic Modalities: The Sonographic Diagnosis of Deep Endometriosis 2022
- Evaluation of an e-learning program for the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis with rectal water contrast transvaginal ultrasonography (rectosonography) 2022
- Endometriosis: A multimodal imaging review 2022
- Learning Curve for the Detection of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis and Adenomyosis with 3-D Transvaginal Water Contrast Sonography 2022
- Transvaginal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Assessment of Endometriosis—An Overview: How, Why, and When 2022
- Ultrasound of the Uterosacral Ligament, Parametrium, and Paracervix: Disagreement in Terminology between Imaging Anatomy and Modern Gynecologic Surgery 2021
- The Reproducibility of Ultrasonographic Findings of Rectosigmoid Endometriosis Among Examiners With Different Level of Expertise 2021
- A prospective study comparing rectal water contrast‐transvaginal ultrasonography with sonovaginography for the diagnosis of deep posterior endometriosis 2021
- Impact of Uterine Sliding Sign in Routine United States Ultrasound Practice 2020
- Non-enhanced Transvaginal Ultrasonography 2020
- Prevalence of negative sliding sign representing pouch of Douglas obliteration during pelvic transvaginal ultrasound for any indication 2020
- Medical management of endometriosis: what the radiologist needs to know 2020
- SonoPODography: A new diagnostic technique for visualizing superficial endometriosis 2020
- <scp>One‐Size‐Fits‐All</scp> Approach Does Not Work for Gynecology Trainees Learning Endometriosis Ultrasound Skills 2020
- Ultrasonography for bowel endometriosis 2020
- Differential Diagnosis of Endometriosis by Ultrasound: A Rising Challenge 2020
- Enhanced Ultrasonographic Techniques 2020
- Early Learning Curve in the Assessment of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis for Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2020
- Structured manual for MRI assessment of deep infiltrating endometriosis using the ENZIAN classification 2020
- International survey finds majority of gynecologists are not aware of and do not utilize ultrasound techniques to diagnose and map endometriosis 2020
- Learning curve for detection of pelvic parts of ureters by transvaginal sonography: feasibility study 2019
- Ultrasonographic soft markers for detection of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis 2019
- Is it time to include assessment of the most common gynaecological condition in the routine ultrasound evaluation of the pelvis? 2019
- A pictorial guide to the ultrasound identification and assessment of uterosacral ligaments in women with potential endometriosis 2019
- Assessing research gaps and unmet needs in endometriosis 2019
- 10.1016/s0246-1064(20)82932-6 2000
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:19:25.021412+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK