Responsiveness of the Dutch Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) questionnaire

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 15 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This study assessed the responsiveness of the Dutch Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) questionnaire in measuring changes in health-related quality of life over time.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the responsiveness to change and the minimal clinical important difference (MCID) of the Dutch Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) questionnaire.Study designProspective cohort study among endometriosis patients attending the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre and members of the Dutch endometriosis patient-support group. EHP-30 was measured at baseline and after 6 months. Changes in treatment were recorded, as well as the subjective change in symptoms. Effect sizes and index of responsiveness were evaluated as appropriate. The MCID was estimated with use of the change in scores in women reporting to feel 'somewhat better' after 6 months.Results228 women were included. Effect sizes varied from 0.1 to 0.5 in the complete group and from 0.3 to 1.1 in the group of women who reported improvement. Index of responsiveness ranged from 0.1 to 0.7 on the eleven dimensions of the questionnaire. MCID was 3.2-17.5 depending on the dimension.ConclusionsThe Dutch EHP-30 is sensitive to change and represents a useful tool in future research on the effect of endometriosis treatment on health status.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Health Status Quality of Life Surveys and Questionnaires Adult Cohort Studies Endometriosis Female Humans Middle Aged Netherlands Prospective Studies Surveys and Questionnaires

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (13)

Cited by (15)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-28T06:14:09.330459+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:19:12.052662+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK