Repeatability of Junctional Zone Measurements Using 3‐Dimensional Transvaginal Sonography in Healthy Fertile Women

In: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2016 · vol. 35(7) , pp. 1497–1508 · doi:10.7863/ultra.15.06086 · PMID:27269003 · W2413061889
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 10 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This study assessed the repeatability of 3D transvaginal sonography measurements of the junctional zone in fertile women, finding coefficients of repeatability ranging from ±1.5 to ±3.9 mm that were only slightly improved by averaging measurements.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the junctional zone and determine the intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of junctional zone measurements using 3-dimensional (3D) transvaginal sonography in healthy fertile women. METHODS: We examined 82 consecutive women with 3D transvaginal sonography. The maximum and minimum junctional zone thickness was measured in all uterine walls. The difference between maximum and minimum thickness and average measurements (maximum thickness + minimum thickness/2) of the anterior, posterior, fundal, and lateral walls were calculated. Among the first 40 consecutive women, intraobserver and interobserver repeatability was evaluated according to the Bland-Altman method and expressed as a coefficient of repeatability. RESULTS: Using 3D transvaginal sonography, we visualized a thin and regular junctional zone in most women. The posterior uterine wall had the largest median maximum junctional zone thickness value of 5.2 (interquartile range, 3.8-6.5) mm. Ten women (12%) had maximum thickness values of 8.0 to 12.0 mm. The maximum thickness in each uterine wall had intraobserver and interobserver coefficients of repeatability of ±2.1 to ±3.4 and ±2.6 to ±3.9 mm, respectively, which were reduced by average measurements: ±1.9 and ±2.0 mm (anterior and posterior walls) and ±1.5 mm (fundal and lateral walls) for intraobserver and interobserver values. Correlations between measurements were poor in the narrow range of junctional zone thickness. CONCLUSIONS: The junctional zone has an indistinct outline on 3D transvaginal sonography, resulting in measurement errors within a broad range of ±2 to ±4 mm, which were only reduced to some extent by average measurements. The thickness of the junctional zone varied within a narrow range in this healthy fertile population, and reliability measurements of junctional zone thickness have to be evaluated in women with a wider range of thickness. The observer repeatability and reliability of junctional zone measurements need to be further evaluated and refined before applying this method in clinical practice.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (41)

Cited by (10)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T05:39:31.692385+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK