Correction: Clinical presentation of perineal endometriosis and prognostic nomogram after surgical resection
This correction states that hormonal medication did not significantly interfere with recurrence risk, but pain symptoms improved with hormone intervention after recurrence, suggesting postoperative hormonal suppression extends disease-free intervals without preventing recurrence.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This document is a correction to Zhu et al.’s original BMC Women’s Health study on the clinical presentation of perineal endometriosis and a prognostic nomogram after surgical resection. The correction adds text to reference 32 in the original article, clarifying that in their study hormonal medication did not show a statistically significant association with recurrence risk, although pain in most recurrent cases improved after timely hormonal intervention; it also cites evidence that perineal endometriosis can regress after pregnancy and that GnRH-a inhibits lesions in a rat model but regrowth occurs after hormone cessation. The authors explicitly note that postoperative hormonal suppression may extend the disease-free interval without completely preventing recurrence. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it is specifically a correction related to perineal endometriosis clinical presentation and prognostic nomogram after surgical resection.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (1)
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-20T00:34:29.006556+00:00