Is gabapentin effective and safe in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

In: International Urogynecology Journal · 2022 · vol. 33(5) , pp. 1071–1081 · doi:10.1007/s00192-021-05017-0 · PMID:35013759 · W4205209767
review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-22

This meta-analysis found gabapentin significantly reduced average pain scores at 3 and 6 months for women with chronic pelvic pain but did not differ from placebo in baseline reduction, while increasing side effect incidence.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 · read from full text

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of gabapentin versus placebo for reducing pain in women with chronic pelvic pain, pooling data from randomized controlled trials identified via database searches (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, and Clinicalkey). Four RCTs (425 patients) were included, and gabapentin was associated with significantly lower average pain scores at 3 and 6 months compared with placebo, but there was no statistically significant difference between groups in pain score reduction from baseline. The incidence of side effects was significantly higher with gabapentin than with placebo. The review’s limitation is that only four RCTs were available for pooling, despite using standard risk-of-bias assessment and meta-analytic methods. Relevance to endometriosis: chronic pelvic pain is a key clinical presentation in which endometriosis is often implicated, though this meta-analysis is not specifically focused on endometriosis or adenomyosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesisChronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects 2.1-24% of women, causing physical and psychological damage to women around the world. Based on the efficacy of gabapentin in the treatment of chronic pain, we conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin in reducing pain in women with CPP.MethodsSystematic searches were performed in the electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, and Clinicalkey databases. Studies focused on comparing the efficacy of gabapentin and placebo in the treatment of female CPP patients were included. RevMan 5.4 was used to analyze the results and risk of bias. Two investigators independently selected eligible studies and extracted related pain scores and side effects for meta-analysis.ResultsIn total, 4 RCTs were enrolled in the meta-analysis, totaling 425 patients. Among patients receiving gabapentin, the average pain scores in 3 and 6 months were significantly lower than those in the placebo group(p < 0.00001). The results showed that there was no statistical difference between gabapentin and placebo in the reduction of pain scores from baseline(p = 0.41). The incidence of side effects in the gabapentin group was significantly higher than that in the placebo group (p < 0.00001).ConclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that for women with CPP, gabapentin was significantly different from placebo in average pain scores at 3 and 6 months. However, the two drugs did not differ in the reduction in pain scores from baseline. Gabapentin can bring more significant side effects, whether they are common side effects or serious side effects.
Full text 9,871 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects 2.1–24% of women, causing physical and psychological damage to women around the world. Based on the efficacy of gabapentin in the treatment of chronic pain, we conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin in reducing pain in women with CPP.

Methods

Systematic searches were performed in the electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, and Clinicalkey databases. Studies focused on comparing the efficacy of gabapentin and placebo in the treatment of female CPP patients were included. RevMan 5.4 was used to analyze the results and risk of bias. Two investigators independently selected eligible studies and extracted related pain scores and side effects for meta-analysis.

Results

In total, 4 RCTs were enrolled in the meta-analysis, totaling 425 patients. Among patients receiving gabapentin, the average pain scores in 3 and 6 months were significantly lower than those in the placebo group(p < 0.00001). The results showed that there was no statistical difference between gabapentin and placebo in the reduction of pain scores from baseline(p = 0.41). The incidence of side effects in the gabapentin group was significantly higher than that in the placebo group (p < 0.00001).

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that for women with CPP, gabapentin was significantly different from placebo in average pain scores at 3 and 6 months. However, the two drugs did not differ in the reduction in pain scores from baseline. Gabapentin can bring more significant side effects, whether they are common side effects or serious side effects. Similar content being viewed by others Abbreviations - BMI: - Body mass index - CPP: - Chronic pelvic pain - fMRI: - Functional magnetic resonance imaging - NR: - Not recorded - NRS: - Numerical rating scale - PRISMA: - Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses - SD: - Standard deviation - VAS: - Visual analogue scale

References

Speer LM, Mushkbar S, Erbele T. Chronic pelvic pain in women. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93:380–7. Latthe P, Latthe M, Say L, Gülmezoglu M, Khan KS. WHO systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: a neglected reproductive health morbidity. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:177. Zondervan KT, Yudkin PL, Vessey MP, Dawes MG, Barlow DH, Kennedy SH. Prevalence and incidence of chronic pelvic pain in primary care: evidence from a national general practice database. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:1149–55. Chronic Pelvic Pain: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 218. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135:e98–e109. Brawn J, Morotti M, Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Vincent K. Central changes associated with chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:737–47. Daniels JP, Khan KS. Chronic pelvic pain in women. BMJ. 2010;341:c4834. Ayorinde AA, Macfarlane GJ, Saraswat L, Bhattacharya S. Chronic pelvic pain in women: an epidemiological perspective. Womens Health (Lond). 2015;11:851–64. Stones RW, Mountfield J. Interventions for treating chronic pelvic pain in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000; CD000387. Rose MA, Kam PC. Gabapentin: pharmacology and its use in pain management. Anaesthesia. 2002;57:451–62. Montastruc F, Loo SY, Renoux C. Trends in First Gabapentin and Pregabalin Prescriptions in Primary Care in the United Kingdom, 1993–2017. JAMA. 2018;320:2149–51. Wiffen PJ, Derry S, Bell RF, Rice AS, Tölle TR, Phillips T, et al. Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:CD007938. Abdi S, Lee DH, Chung JM. The anti-allodynic effects of amitriptyline, gabapentin, and lidocaine in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Anesth Analg. 1998;87:1360–6. Iannetti GD, Zambreanu L, Wise RG, Buchanan TJ, Huggins JP, Smart TS, et al. Pharmacological modulation of pain-related brain activity during normal and central sensitization states in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:18195–200. Pan HL, Eisenach JC, Chen SR. Gabapentin suppresses ectopic nerve discharges and reverses allodynia in neuropathic rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;288:1026–30. Sator-Katzenschlager SM, Scharbert G, Kress HG, Frickey N, Ellend A, Gleiss A, et al. Chronic pelvic pain treated with gabapentin and amitriptyline: a randomized controlled pilot study. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2005;117:761–8. Horne AW, Vincent K, Hewitt CA, Middleton LJ, Koscielniak M, Szubert W, et al. Gabapentin for chronic pelvic pain in women (GaPP2): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;396:909–17. AbdelHafeez MA, Reda A, Elnaggar A, El-Zeneiny H, Mokhles JM. Gabapentin for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300:1271–7. Lewis SC, Bhattacharya S, Wu O, Vincent K, Jack SA, Critchley HO, et al. Gabapentin for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women (GaPP1): a pilot randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0153037. Seretny M, Murray SR, Whitaker L, Murnane J, Whalley H, Pernet C, et al. The use of brain functional magnetic resonance imaging to determine the mechanism of action of gabapentin in managing chronic pelvic pain in women: a pilot study. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e026152. Bachmann GA, Brown CS, Phillips NA, et al. Effect of gabapentin on sexual function in vulvodynia: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220:89.e1–8. Magistro G, Wagenlehner FM, Grabe M, Weidner W, Stief CG, Nickel JC. Contemporary management of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Eur Urol. 2016;69:286–97. Alexander RB, Propert KJ, Schaeffer AJ, Landis JR, Nickel JC, O'Leary MP, et al. Ciprofloxacin or tamsulosin in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a randomized, double-blind trial. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:581–9. Anothaisintawee T, Attia J, Nickel JC, Thammakraisorn S, Numthavaj P, McEvoy M, et al. Management of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;305:78–86. Nickel JC, Downey J, Clark J, Casey RW, Pommerville PJ, Barkin J, et al. Levofloxacin for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome in men: a randomized placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Urology. 2003;62:614–7. Dallocchio C, Buffa C, Mazzarello P, Chiroli S. Gabapentin vs. amitriptyline in painful diabetic neuropathy: an open-label pilot study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000;20:280–5. Keskinbora K, Pekel AF, Aydinli I. Comparison of efficacy of gabapentin and amitriptyline in the management of peripheral neuropathic pain. Agri. 2006;18:34–40. Poterucha TJ, Murphy SL, Rho RH, Sandroni P, Warndahl RA, Weiss WT, et al. Topical amitriptyline-ketamine for treatment of rectal, genital, and perineal pain and discomfort. Pain Physician. 2012;15:485–8. Cakici ÖU, Hamidi N, Ürer E, Okulu E, Kayigil O. Efficacy of sertraline and gabapentin in the treatment of urethral pain syndrome: retrospective results of a single institutional cohort. Cent European J Urol. 2018;71:78–83. Strauss AC, Dimitrakov JD. New treatments for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Nat Rev Urol. 2010;7:127–35. Nguyen S, Harleman E. I have chronic pelvic pain: what should I know? JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181:888. Hewitt CA, Vincent K, Middleton LJ, Romaniuk L, Koscielniak M, Doust AM, et al. Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation. Gabapentin to reduce pain in women aged between 18 and 50 years with chronic pelvic pain: the GaPP2 RCT. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2020. This work was produced by Hewitt et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.; 2020. McLean MJ, Morrell MJ, Willmore LJ, Privitera MD, Faught RE, Holmes GL, et al. Safety and tolerability of gabapentin as adjunctive therapy in a large, multicenter study. Epilepsia. 1999;40:965–72. Beydoun A, Uthman BM, Sackellares JC. Gabapentin: pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety. Clin Neuropharmacol. 1995;18:469–81. Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions Y.W.H. helped to design the study, conduct the study, analyze the data, and write the manuscript. Y.W.H. is also the first author and is responsible for archiving the study files. X.H.Z. helped to conduct the study, analyze the data, and write the manuscript. W.H.M. is the corresponding author, mainly responsible for the inspection of the study, and final approval of the article. Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflicts of interest This article did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Additional information Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Supplementary information ESM 1 (download DOCX ) (DOCX 16 kb) ESM 2 (download DOCX ) (DOCX 32 kb) Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article He, Y., Zhuang, X. & Ma, W. Is gabapentin effective and safe in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 33, 1071–1081 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05017-0 Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05017-0

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (37)

Cited by (1)

SciLite annotations

chemicals 7
gabapentin gabapentin gabapentin gabapentin gabapentin gabapentin gabapentin
organisms 4
noordeloos 2009062 noordeloos 2009062 noordeloos 2009062 noordeloos 2009062

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-05-18T04:25:29.313245+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK