A Scoping Review on Interventions for Chronic Pelvic Pain

In: Indian Journal of Pain · 2023 · vol. 37(Suppl 1) , pp. S3–S10 · doi:10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_126_23 · W4390453036
review OA: diamond CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-07

This scoping review tabulates recent evidence on interventions for chronic pelvic pain, highlighting patient education, pharmacotherapy, physical therapy, and cognitive behavioral therapy as common approaches.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-20 · read from full text

This scoping review examines the multifactorial etiology, central sensitization mechanisms, and management strategies for chronic pelvic pain in women. It identifies endometriosis as a primary gynecological diagnosis confirmed via laparoscopy among the various organic causes contributing to this condition. The authors highlight that effective treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach addressing both physical etiologies and psychological comorbidities like anxiety and depression. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one of the main gynecological diagnoses causing chronic pelvic pain, though the paper's main focus is the broader syndrome of chronic pelvic pain rather than endometriosis-specific interventions.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a complex and debilitating condition affecting a significant portion of the global population, predominantly women. This review dwells on various interventions to alleviate the burden of CPP and improve patients’ quality of life. Traditional approaches have included patient education, pharmacotherapy, physical therapy, and cognitive behavioral therapy. However, the limited efficacy and potential side effects of long-term medications necessitate a multidisciplinary approach. The review lists a comprehensive tabulation of results from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on CPP interventions published in the past 5 years.
Full text 17,386 characters · extracted from oa-html · 3 sections · click to expand

Introduction

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is defined as recurrent or constant pelvic pain of at least 6 months duration, unrelated to periods, intercourse, or pregnancy. The prevalence of chronic pain is 24%. One-third of the women had pain for more than 5 years. Patients suffering from CPP refrain from seeking medical help and they usually neglect it terming it as dysmenorrhea. Patients with CPP have a coexisting anxiety disorder (31%) as compared with women with dysmenorrhea (7%).[] There is a wide range of possible causes for CPP, most of which are difficult to diagnose and treat. The main gynecological diagnoses – which are mostly confirmed during laparoscopy – include endometriosis, chronic pelvic inflammatory disease, and adhesions.[] Given the longer course the CPP takes to manifest, it is often missed in the initial stages. There is no specific test for diagnosis of CPP. However, tests can be advised if co-existing gynecological conditions are suspected. ETIOLOGY CPP is usually found in association with irritable bowel syndrome, and interstitial cystitis. Apart from organic causes, the prevalence of CPP is high in patients with anxiety disorder, mood disorder, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder.[] It is also seen that patients with CPP have a higher incidence of depression, anxiety, and sleep disorders. This leads to a vicious cycle of pain leading to mood and affective disorder and this in turn leads to pain. Mental trauma, physical abuse, and childhood sexual abuse can lead to posttraumatic stress which may be overseen and can lead to CPP.[] Other organic causes linked with the causation of CPP include nerve root entrapment, sacral cysts, leiomyomas, and cauda equina syndrome.[] The equivalent in males, chronic prostatitis/CPP syndrome (CP/CPPS) is characterized by persistent pain and discomfort in the pelvic region and poses a management challenge due to its multifactorial nature. Accurate diagnosis involves subtyping based on symptoms, distinguishing between inflammatory, noninflammatory, pelvic floor dysfunction, and asymptomatic inflammatory prostatitis. Treatment strategies encompass various approaches, including pharmacotherapy with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), alpha-blockers, physical therapy, stress management, and extracorporeal shockwave. The conclusions of the past 5 years of systematic review and meta-analyses are listed in Table 1. MECHANISM OF DEVELOPING CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN Impairment in the central pain processing pathway has been attributed to the development of CPP. The body’s threshold for pain is reduced, so even mild pain is experienced as severe pain (hyperalgesia). In addition to these normal sensations such as touch can be misinterpreted as pain (allodynia). The central sensitization sets in which involves the following mechanism: Central reorganization: Following nerve injury Aa fibers form convergence in lamina II and synapse with the neurons conveying nociception resulting in mechanical allodynia, area of pain increases along the distribution of other nerves due to activation of interneurons at the spinal level, loss of function of descending inhibitory pathways Disinhibition: Downregulation of inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA, glycine, and opioid receptors in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord Ectopic discharges: Facilitation of the excitatory synapses Wind-up phenomenon: Repeated stimulation of C fibers results in the temporal summation of inputs from them increasing the excitatory stimulus Activation of Wide Dynamic Range (WDR) neurons. WDR cells are recruited in the pain pathway. The above mechanisms lead to central sensitization which results in: Increase in the intensity, area, and duration of pain Decrease in the tolerability of pain Development of psychological problems Pain becomes unresponsive to conventional analgesics.[] EVALUATION OF THE PATIENT WITH CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN Since the association of CPP and central pain mechanisms has been established, it is important to obtain a history regarding central sensitization such as features of hyperalgesia and allodynia. A history regarding previous gynecological/obstetric intervention may help narrow down the diagnosis. Symptoms associated with CPP such as menstrual disturbances, urinary symptoms, sexual, and psychological should also be evaluated. Patients may also have autonomic or motor dysfunction which needs to be evaluated.[] Apart from evaluating in lines of CPP, care should be given to assessing red flag signs to rule out malignancy. A history of weight loss, pelvic mass, hematuria, postcoital bleeding, and postmenstrual bleeding should trigger suspicion and further assessment to be done to rule out malignant causes. Apart from history, gynecological examination and full pelvic and abdominal examination needs to be carried out. Other neuraxial pain such as myofascial pain, facet arthropathy, sacroiliac joint arthropathy, and lumbosacral transitional vertebra should be evaluated for and ruled out. A workup plan is illustrated in Figure 1 for evaluating a patient with CPP. Once history and examination are done and other obvious causes ruled out, the patient may be asked to get blood and radiological workup to be done. A baseline laboratory investigation such as complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate/C-reactive protein, liver function test/renal function test may be needed, in addition to specific organ function test, if their derangement is suspected. Acute onset severe pain goes against the diagnosis of CPP and needs prompt evaluation by the emergency department. Diagnostic blocks can be done to rule out the neuraxial causes, for example, diagnostic facet block if facet joint arthropathy is suspected, and selective nerve root block if nerve entrapment is suspected. MANAGEMENT Patient education regarding the mechanism of development of CPP can help decrease the anxiety and apprehension associated with the disease and help improve patient compliance with the treatment. The mainstay of treatment is to identify the causative factor that led to CPP and treat it and prevent further complications. If no causative factor is found, then the first line of medications includes paracetamol and NSAIDs.[] If a neuropathic component is seen, then the addition of an antiepileptic (pregabalin/gabapentin) or anti-depressant (nortriptyline, sertraline, and duloxetine) will be beneficial. The combination of the above has been more beneficial than when used alone.[] Hormonal replacement therapy has been found helpful in postmenopausal patients suffering from CPP with no other etiologies. The role is opioid analgesics in chronic pain conditions is questionable. If CPP is associated with other causes, then a trial of opioids as a part of multimodal analgesia can be tried out. Another nonpharmacological treatment has been tried for CPP. Pelvic floor exercises improve pelvic muscle tone and may alleviate pain. Cognitive behavioral therapy is beneficial. It decreases stress and enhances productivity.[] Once a specific diagnostic block is successful in relieving pain, then radiofrequency ablation can be planned. Cutaneous injections at trigger points with local anesthetic have been tried. If the patient gets relieved by these trigger point injections, a diagnosis of myofascial pain syndrome can be made. Neuromodulation with spinal cord stimulation or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation has also shown positive results.[] Numerous measures have been tried with variable success to mitigate the symptoms of pain in patients of CPP. Considerable overlap of etiologies exists in patients experiencing the symptoms and a patient-specific comprehensive approach can help alleviate pain. A summary of observations noted from systematic review and meta-analysis conducted in the past 5 years (2018–2023), listed on PubMed is tabulated in Table 1. The table has three sections-interventions, pharmacotherapies, and alternative therapies. The table demonstrates a variety of clinical entities and syndromes, including CP/ CPPSs, myofascial pelvic floor pain, pelvic venous reflux, and chronic pain due to other causes, contributing to CPP. Certain intervention modalities such as the extracorporeal shockwave for CP/CPPS in males have been listed separately under intervention as shown in Table 1.

Conclusion

CPP involves complex central and peripheral mechanisms in its development. Prompt identification of the causative factor of CPP helps in targeted management. The management involves multiple pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches. The treatment should aim at improving the symptoms and providing a better quality of life for the patient. Treatment of CPP needs a multidisciplinary approach and robust communication should be built by all the treating doctors for the best outcomes. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Zondervan KT, Yudkin PL, Vessey MP, Jenkinson CP, Dawes MG, Barlow DH, et al. The community prevalence of chronic pelvic pain in women and associated illness behaviour. Br J Gen Pract 2001;51:541–7.2. Steege JF, Siedhoff MT. Chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:616–29.3. Lorençatto C, Petta CA, Navarro MJ, Bahamondes L, Matos A. Depression in women with endometriosis with and without chronic pelvic pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85:88–92.4. Walker E, Katon W, Harrop-Griffiths J, Holm L, Russo J, Hickok LR. Relationship of chronic pelvic pain to psychiatric diagnoses and childhood sexual abuse. Am J Psychiatry 1988;145:75–80.5. Possover M, Schneider T, Henle KP. Laparoscopic therapy for endometriosis and vascular entrapment of sacral plexus. Fertil Steril 2011;95:756–8.6. Panunzio A, Tafuri A, Mazzucato G, Cerrato C, Orlando R, Pagliarulo V, et al. Botulinum toxin-a injection in chronic pelvic pain syndrome treatment: A systematic review and pooled meta-analysis. Toxins (Basel) 2022;14:25.7. Frederice CP, Brito LG, Pereira GM, Lunardi AL, Juliato CR. Interventional treatment for myofascial pelvic floor pain in women: Systematic review with meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 2021;32:1087–96.8. Leonardi M, Armour M, Gibbons T, Cave A, As-Sanie S, Condous G, et al. Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021;12:CD008212.9. Xu J, Sun Z, Wu J, Rana M, Garza J, Zhu AC, et al. Peripheral nerve stimulation in pain management: A systematic review. Pain Physician 2021;24:E131–52.10. Ghorayeb JH, Chitneni A, Rupp A, Parkash A, Abd-Elsayed A. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain: A systematic review. Pain Pract 2023;23:838–46.11. Luo FY, Nasr-Esfahani M, Jarrell J, Robert M. Botulinum toxin injection for chronic pelvic pain: A systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020;99:1595–602.12. Greig J, Mak Q, Furrer MA, Sahai A, Raison N. Sacral neuromodulation in the management of chronic pelvic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurourol Urodyn 2023;42:822–36.13. Stelter B, Karri J, Marathe A, Abd-Elsayed A. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation for the treatment of non-complex regional pain syndrome related chronic pain syndromes: A systematic review. Neuromodulation 2021;24:622–33.14. Mahran A, Baaklini G, Hassani D, Abolella HA, Safwat AS, Neudecker M, et al. Sacral neuromodulation treating chronic pelvic pain: A meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J 2019;30:1023–35.15. Cottrell AM, Schneider MP, Goonewardene S, Yuan Y, Baranowski AP, Engeler DS, et al. Benefits and harms of electrical neuromodulation for chronic pelvic pain: A systematic review. Eur Urol Focus 2020;6:559–71.16. Sutanto SA, Tan M, Onida S, Davies AH. A systematic review on isolated coil embolization for pelvic venous reflux. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2022;10:224–32.e9.17. Deer TR, Esposito MF, McRoberts WP, Grider JS, Sayed D, Verrills P, et al. A systematic literature review of peripheral nerve stimulation therapies for the treatment of pain. Pain Med 2020;21:1590–603.18. Kong X, Hu W, Dong Z, Tian J, Wang Y, Jin C, et al. The efficacy and safety of low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave treatment combined with or without medications in chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2023;26:483–94.19. Yuan P, Ma D, Zhang Y, Gao X, Liu Z, Li R, et al. Efficacy of low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurourol Urodyn 2019;38:1457–66.20. Franco JV, Turk T, Jung JH, Xiao YT, Iakhno S, Garrote V, et al. Non-pharmacological interventions for treating chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A cochrane systematic review. BJU Int 2019;124:197–208.21. Li G, Man L. Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy for male chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Androl Urol 2021;10:1202–11.22. Kang Y, Song P, Cao D, et al. The Efficacy and Safety of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy versus Acupuncture in the Management of Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: Evidence Based on a Network Meta-analysis. Am J Mens Health 2021;15:15579883211057998. [doi:10.1177/15579883211057998]23. Birowo P, Rangganata E, Rasyid N, Atmoko W. Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of chronic non-bacterial prostatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020;15:e0244295.24. Qin Z, Zhang C, Guo J, Kwong JS, Li X, Pang R, et al. Oral pharmacological treatments for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. EClinicalMedicine 2022;48:101457.25. Hatfield E, Phillips K, Swidan S, Ashman L. Use of low-dose naltrexone in the management of chronic pain conditions: A systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2020;151:891–902.e1.26. He Y, Zhuang X, Ma W. Is gabapentin effective and safe in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain in women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 2022;33:1071–81.27. de Souza Pinto LP, Ferrari G, Dos Santos IK, de Mello Roesler CR, de Mello Gindri I. Evaluation of safety and effectiveness of gestrinone in the treatment of endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023;307:21–37.28. Fan XM, Ren YF, Fu X, Wu H, Ye X, Jiang YF, et al. Gabapentin has longer-term efficacy for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain in women: A systematic review and pilot meta-analysis. Pain Ther 2021;10:1673–89.29. Franco JV, Turk T, Jung JH, Xiao YT, Iakhno S, Tirapegui FI, et al. Pharmacological interventions for treating chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;10:CD012552.30. Benetti-Pinto CL, Mira TA, Yela DA, Teatin-Juliato CR, Brito LG. Pharmacological treatment for symptomatic adenomyosis: A systematic review. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2019;41:564–74.31. Mohiuddin M, Pivetta B, Gilron I, Khan JS. Efficacy and safety of N-acetylcysteine for the management of chronic pain in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Med 2021;22:2896–907.32. Marchand G, Masoud AT, Govindan M, Ware K, King A, Ruther S, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of gabapentin in chronic female pelvic pain without another diagnosis. AJOG Glob Rep 2022;2:100042.33. Andrade MA, Soares LC, Oliveira MA. The effect of neuromodulatory drugs on the intensity of chronic pelvic pain in women: A systematic review. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2022;44:891–8.34. Liang AL, Gingher EL, Coleman JS. Medical cannabis for gynecologic pain conditions: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2022;139:287–96.35. Sukan B, Akdevelioğlu Y, Sukan VN. Effect of antioxidant supplementation on endometriosis-related pain: A systematic review. Curr Nutr Rep 2022;11:753–64.36. Sung SH, Sung AD, Sung HK, An TE, Kim KH, Park JK. Acupuncture treatment for chronic pelvic pain in women: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2018;2018:9415897. doi: 10.1155/2018/9415897.37. Pan H, Bao Y, Cao H, Jin R, Wang P, Zhang J. The effectiveness of magnetic stimulation for patients with pelvic floor dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurourol Urodyn 2018;37:2368–81.38. Das G. Basics of Pain Management. 3rd ed. New Delhi: CBS Publishers and Distributors Pvt. Ltd.; 2022.39. Giamberardino MA, Affaitati G, Fabrizio A, Costantini R. Myofascial pain syndromes and their evaluation. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2011;25:185–98.40. Cheong YC, Smotra G, Williams AC. Non-surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014.CD008797. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008797.pub2.41. Sator-Katzenschlager SM, Scharbert G, Kress HG, Frickey N, Ellend A, Gleiss A, et al. Chronic pelvic pain treated with gabapentin and amitriptyline: A randomized controlled pilot study. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2005;117:761–8.42. Louw A, Zimney K, O’Hotto C, Hilton S. The clinical application of teaching people about pain. Physiother Theory Pract 2016;32:385–95.43. Martellucci J, Naldini G, Carriero A. Sacral nerve modulation in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012;27:921–6.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (48)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK