Abnormal uterine bleeding: etiology and pathogenesis (descriptive review)

In: RESEARCH RESULTS IN BIOMEDICINE · 2022 · vol. 8(3) · doi:10.18413/2658-6533-2022-8-3-0-8 · W4296286103
article OA: diamond CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10

This review describes the complex causes and mechanisms underlying abnormal uterine bleeding, highlighting key factors involved in its pathogenesis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10

This descriptive review analyzes literature from the last 10 years on abnormal uterine bleeding, focusing on terminology, etiological and pathogenetic mechanisms, and classification systems using sources such as PubMed, eLibrary, and Scopus. It reports that the problem remains highly prioritized in international gynecologic practice and is addressed in international recommendations, and that adopting unified terminology with the FIGO classification helps standardize research and care approaches. The review concludes that FIGO recommends the PALM-COEIN system for classifying non-gestational causes of abnormal uterine bleeding, and it states that the etiologic diagnosis is linked to treatment success; it also notes that understanding pathogenesis could support new diagnostic and monitoring tools, especially for “endometrial” and “unclassified” causes. This paper is centrally about abnormal uterine bleeding etiology and classification, with explicit relevance to endometriosis because it highlights “endometrial” and “unclassified” causes where endometriosis-related bleeding mechanisms may overlap in the differential framework, though it does not specifically analyze endometriosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

:

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (60)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK