Diagnosis and classification of uterine fibroids

Rosa Lakabi, Sebastian Harth, Ivo Meinhold‐Heerlein, Alisha V. Olsthoorn, Malcolm G Munro, Ally Murji
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · 2025 · vol. 171(2) , pp. 566–573 · doi:10.1002/ijgo.70538 · PMID:40970558 · W4414354116
article OA: hybrid CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

Uterine fibroids, or leiomyomas, are benign uterine tumors with a lifetime prevalence of approximately 75%. While only a minority become symptomatic, their impact on quality of life remains profound owing to heavy menstrual bleeding, bulk symptoms, and reproductive dysfunction. Interestingly, fibroids are not reliably diagnosed on physical examination, nor can their impact be predicted through palpation. Consequently, the diagnosis and phenotypic categorization of uterine fibroids relies primarily on imaging to guide subsequent clinical management. Ultrasound should be the first-line diagnostic modality, and magnetic resonance imaging should be reserved for complex cases and/or surgical planning. Adherence to standardized structured reporting across imaging modalities is critical to improve diagnostic accuracy, differentiate fibroids from conditions such as adenomyosis or malignancies, predict therapeutic responses, and plan surgical interventions. Imaging reports should follow the FIGO classification system for uterine fibroids, to enable a standardized description of their relationship to the endometrium, myometrium, and uterine serosa.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Outcome instruments

MUSA

Condition tags

adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Leiomyoma

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (57)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pmc
last seen: 2026-05-13T20:22:03.195721+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-06-02T00:31:05.662070+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK