A pilot study on the use of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation to relieve dysmenorrhea in patients with adenomyosis and endometriosis
This pilot study explored transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) in six patients with adenomyosis and endometriosis, finding it well-tolerated and effective in relieving menstrual pain at three and six months.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This pilot study evaluated transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) for feasibility, tolerability, and changes in dysmenorrhea severity in six treatment-naïve reproductive-age patients (four with adenomyosis and two with unilateral ovarian endometrioma). Participants received taVNS once daily for 30 minutes over 6 months, with outcomes assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months using visual analog scale (VAS) scores for dysmenorrhea, menstrual blood loss, hemoglobin, and heart rate variability (HRV) measures of vagal tone. Median dysmenorrhea VAS scores decreased significantly at both 3 and 6 months, and HRV showed a progressive improvement in vagal tone (increased RMSSD, pNN50, and high-frequency power; decreased low-frequency power and LF/HF ratio), while uterine volume, lesion size, menstrual blood loss, hemoglobin, and several blood markers did not change. The authors explicitly frame this as a small, non-randomized pilot and emphasize the need for larger randomized sham-controlled trials; this paper is centrally about endometriosis and adenomyosis — it tests taVNS as a neuromodulatory approach to relieve dysmenorrhea in patients with these conditions.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,692 characters
· extracted from
pmc-nxml
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Funding
Coi Statement
Author Contributions
Human Rights Statements And Informed Consent
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Outcome instruments
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-07-27T06:15:28.040536+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-07-01T06:05:52.148367+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-07-27T06:09:29.080095+00:00