OHVIRA: An In-Depth Review with Practical Applications for OBGYNs Worldwide

In: Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports · 2025 · vol. 14(1) · doi:10.1007/s13669-025-00441-1 · W4414773777
article OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-13

This review discusses OHVIRA features, diagnostic and management strategies, reproductive health impacts, and coding considerations, noting associations with endometriosis and potential pregnancy complications.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13 · read from full text

This review examines obstructed hemivagina with ipsilateral renal anomaly (OHVIRA), summarizing how it presents, how it is diagnosed, and approaches to management across resource settings, including coding/billing and considerations for reproductive health over the lifespan. It reports that about two-thirds of OHVIRA patients have endometriosis found on laparoscopy, while overall fertility rates are similar to the general population; however, pregnancy may have higher risks of complications such as malpresentation and preterm delivery. The authors also note emerging reports of possible rare cervical cancer risks on the previously obstructed side. A key limitation is that MRI is preferred for the most accurate pre-surgical diagnosis but may be unavailable in low-resource settings, prompting discussion of alternatives. This paper is centrally about endometriosis on laparoscopy findings in OHVIRA patients and discusses long-term reproductive risks relevant to endometriosis and adenomyosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 10,530 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose of Review Discuss common and uncommon features of obstructed hemivagina with ipsilateral renal anomaly (OHVIRA), including diagnostic strategies, management, referral considerations, and the impact of OHVIRA on reproductive health throughout the patient’s lifespan. Coding and billing resources are also included to aid in accurately capturing the complexity of Müllerian anomalies. Recent Findings Two-thirds of patients with OHVIRA have endometriosis on laparoscopy. Patients with OHVIRA experience normal fertility rates comparable to the general population, but may be at increased risk for certain pregnancy complications such as malpresentation and preterm delivery. Recent reports indicate there may be risk for rare forms of cervical cancer on the previously obstructed side. Strategies for recognition and management may differ in high resource versus low resource settings. Summary OHVIRA is a complex Müllerian anomaly, and diagnosis is often delayed. High resolution MRI is preferred for most accurate pre-surgical diagnosis, however this imaging modality may not be available in low resource settings. Development of accessible advanced imaging tools may provide improved diagnostic capabilities in limited resource settings. Medical management is appropriate for many patients until a comprehensive plan including post-operative considerations is finalized. Surgical correction should be performed by a specialist or subspecialist with appropriate training. Long term reproductive health implications to consider include increased risk of endometriosis, certain pregnancy complications, and possible rare gynecologic cancer risks. Similar content being viewed by others Data Availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

Grimbizis GF, Campo R. Congenital malformations of the female genital tract: the need for a new classification system. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(2):401–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.02.030. Zurawin RK, Dietrich JE, Heard MJ, Edwards CL. Didelphic uterus and obstructed hemivagina with renal agenesis: case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2004;17(2):137–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2004.01.016. O’Flynn O’Brien KL, Bhatia V, Homafar M, Gong YY, Winsten MT, Gerber J, et al. The prevalence of Müllerian anomalies in women with a diagnosed renal anomaly. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2021;34(2):154–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2020.11.015. Management of Acute Obstructive Uterovaginal Anomalies. ACOG committee Opinion, number 779. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(6):e363–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000003281. Santos XM, Dietrich JE. Obstructed hemivagina with ipsilateral renal anomaly. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016;29(1):7–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2014.09.008. Han JH, Lee YS, Im YJ, Kim SW, Lee MJ, Han SW. Clinical implications of obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal anomaly (OHVIRA) syndrome in the prepubertal age group. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(11):e0166776. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166776. Acién P, Acién MI. The history of female genital tract malformation classifications and proposal of an updated system. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(5):693–705. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmr021. Kapczuk K, Zajączkowska W, Madziar K, Kędzia W. Endometriosis in adolescents with obstructive anomalies of the reproductive tract. J Clin Med. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12052007. Bortoletto P, Romanski PA, Pfeifer SM. Müllerian anomalies: presentation, diagnosis, and counseling. Obstet Gynecol. 2024;143(3):369–77. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005469. Erkkinen E, Farahzad MM, O’Brien KE, Rosen MW. Pregnancy outcomes in patients with obstructed hemivagina ipsilateral renal agenesis. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2023;36(6):545–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2023.01.139. Candiani M, Vercellini P, Ferrero-Caroggio C, Fedele F, Salvatore S, Fedele L. Conservative treatment of Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome: analysis and long-term follow-up of 51 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;275:84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.06.013. Tanase Y, Yoshida H, Naka T, Kitamura S, Natsume T, Kobayashi Kato M, et al. Clear cell carcinoma of the cervix with OHVIRA syndrome: a rare case report. World J Oncol. 2021;12(1):34–8. https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon1362. Oka E, Chiyoda T, Iwata T, Yamagami W, Aoki D. Uterine cervical cancer associated with obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis (OHVIRA) syndrome: a case report and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2020;34:100645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2020.100645. Giannini A, Massimello F, Caretto M, Cosimi G, Mannella P, Luisi S, et al. Factors in malignant transformation of ovarian endometriosis: a narrative review. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2024;40(1):2409911. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2024.2409911. Peiretti M, Zakashansky K, Melis GB, Mais V. Unusual case of adenocarcinoma arising in endometriosis mimicking colorectal cancer in a young woman with a Müllerian anomaly. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(1):199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.054. .e13-5. Pfeifer SM, Attaran M, Goldstein J, Lindheim SR, Petrozza JC, Rackow BW, et al. ASRM müllerian anomalies classification 2021. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(5):1238–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.09.025. Fedele L, Motta F, Frontino G, Restelli E, Bianchi S. Double uterus with obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis: pelvic anatomic variants in 87 cases. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(6):1580–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det081. Moon LM, Anderson Z, Cisneros-Camacho AL, Dietrich JE. Presentation and management of uterine didelphys with unilateral cervicovaginal agenesis/dysgenesis (CVAD): a multicenter case series. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2024;37(1):72–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2023.08.001. Troiano RN, McCarthy SM. Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology. 2004;233(1):19–34. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2331020777. Brown MA, Mattrey RF, Stamato S, Sirlin CB. Mri of the female pelvis using vaginal gel. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185(5):1221–7. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.04.1660. Papaioannou G, Koussidis G, Michala L. Magnetic resonance imaging visualization of a vaginal septum. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(5):1193–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.08.042. Centers for Disease Control. ICD-10-CM. https://icd10cmtool.cdc.gov/?fy=FY2025. Accessed 19 August 2025. Moon LM, Farnell C. Intra-operative use of fluoroscopy for guidance during surgical resection of obstructive vaginal septum with microperforation: a case report. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2023;36(2):222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2023.01.259. U.S Department of Labor. Table of RVU and Conversion Factor Values by Service Code https://www.dol.gov/agencies/owcp/regs/feeschedule/fee/CPTHCPCSADAOWCPCodes2024. Accessed 25 July 2025. Yousef Y, Lee A, Ayele F, Poenaru D. Delayed access to care and unmet burden of pediatric surgical disease in resource-constrained African countries. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(4):845–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.018. Arnold TC, Freeman CW, Litt B, Stein JM. Low-field MRI: clinical promise and challenges. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023;57(1):25–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.28408. Stewart KA, Navarro SM, Kambala S, Tan G, Poondla R, Lederman S, et al. Trends in ultrasound use in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. Int J MCH AIDS. 2020;9(1):103–20. https://doi.org/10.21106/ijma.294. Criniti A, Lin PC. Applications of intraoperative ultrasound in gynecological surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;17(4):339. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gco.0000175349.10684.e8. Araujo Júnior E, Caldas JVJ, Sun SY, Castro PT, Passos JP, Werner H. Placenta accreta spectrum-first trimester, 2D and 3D ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging findings. J Clin Ultrasound. 2024;52(3):321–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23627. Nassar M, Abdallah W, Atallah D. Intraoperative ultrasound in the management of placenta accreta spectrum: waste of time or valuable step. J Ultrasound Med. 2023;42(4):931–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16090. Toscano M, Szlachetka K, Whaley N, Thornburg LL. Evaluating sensitivity and specificity of handheld point-of-care ultrasound testing for gynecologic pathology: a pilot study for use in low resource settings. BMC Med Imaging. 2020;20(1):121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-00518-8. Kim S, Fischetti C, Guy M, Hsu E, Fox J, Young SD. Artificial intelligence (AI) applications for point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in low-resource settings: a scoping review. Diagnostics. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14151669. Howard LA, Mancuso AC, Ryan GL. Müllerian aplasia with severe hematometra: a case report of diagnosis and management in a low resource setting. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019;32(2):189–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2018.11.006. Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions L.M. created Tables 1, 2 and 3; Figs. 1, 2 and 3. All authors wrote the main manuscript text and reviewed the final manuscript. Corresponding author Ethics declarations Human and Animal Rights All reported studies/experiments with human or animal subjects performed by the authors have been previously published and complied with all applicable ethical standards (including the Helsinki declaration and its amendments, institutional/national research committee standards, and international/national/institutional guidelines). Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Conflict of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest or disclosures. Additional information Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Moon, L.M., O’Flynn O’Brien, K.L. & Dietrich, J.E. OHVIRA: An In-Depth Review with Practical Applications for OBGYNs Worldwide. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep 14, 33 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13669-025-00441-1 Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13669-025-00441-1

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (4)

References (31)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK