El papel de los biomarcadores en el diagnóstico precoz de la endometriosis
This review examines potential biomarkers and research for the early diagnosis of endometriosis, a chronic gynecological condition often diagnosed late.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This paper is a review discussing the role of biomarkers and related research approaches for early diagnosis of endometriosis, emphasizing that chronic symptoms often lead to substantial diagnostic delays and consequent psychological and physical harm. It surveys biomarker categories and diagnostic investigations, including prior literature on CA-125 performance, cervical mucus proteomics, microRNAs, antibodies, and imaging accuracy, while highlighting the continuing challenge that traditional methods have produced poor diagnostic results. As a review, it does not present new patient-level data and is limited by the heterogeneity of included studies and diagnostic modalities. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper’s sole topic is the role of biomarkers in the early diagnosis of endometriosis, focusing specifically on biomarker-based strategies to address diagnostic delay.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
3,299 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (13)
- Cervical mucus proteome in endometriosis via openalex
- How to use CA-125 More Effectively in the Diagnosis of Deep Endometriosis? via openalex
- Recent insights on the genetics and epigenetics of endometriosis via openalex
- Serum and peritoneal abnormalities in endometriosis: potential use as diagnostic markers. via openalex
- Serum Antiendometrial Antibodies and Diagnosis of Endometriosis via openalex
- Serum microRNAs as diagnostic markers of endometriosis: a comprehensive array-based analysis via openalex
- The performance of CA-125 measurement in the detection of endometriosis: a meta-analysis via openalex
- Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis via openalex
- W6732986109 via openalex
- W2083701448 via openalex
- W2118656195 via openalex
- W2620764301 via openalex
- W1599695680 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00