Resident training and endoscopic hospital privileging

Review OA: closed public-domain-us
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-06 ⓘ

This article outlines learning theories and specific objectives for residents to address limited laposcopic training while discussing mechanisms to privilege attending staff and improve clinical outcomes in endoscopic procedures including endometriosis treatment.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-06 · read from full text ⓘ

This article examines the evolution of gynecological endoscopy from basic sterilization to complex procedures like adhesion management and malignancy treatment. It highlights significant gaps in current residency training for laparoscopic and hysteroscopic skills while noting the absence of standardized privileging mechanisms for physicians lacking formal endoscopic education. The authors propose learning theories and specific objectives to establish successful resident training programs and discuss algorithms for renewing clinical privileges. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically, it lists the laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis as a commonplace procedure that relies on the specialized endoscopic training frameworks the authors aim to improve.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Laparoscopic techniques were originally confined to female sterilization. As both instrumentation and methodology improved, gynecological endoscopy was applied to more complex processes, including salpingostomy or salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy, and ovarian cystectomy or oophorectomy for benign conditions. Now, the laparoscopic treatment of adhesions, endometriosis and hysterectomy is almost commonplace. More sophisticated endoscopic procedures include the management of pelvic floor disease, incontinence and malignancies. However, at least two problems have become readily apparent: (i) there is often limited basic laparoscopic and hysteroscopic teaching during residency and fellowship training; and (ii) there is no standard by which to privilege or train physicians who may not have had any significant endoscopic training during residency. In this article we describe current learning theories and identify goals and specific objectives for residents in implementing a successful training program. We also discuss the mechanisms by which to privilege attending staff for gynecological procedures and the important clinical outcomes that can be improved. Finally, we raise concerns about creating algorithms by which to renew clinical privileges in endoscopic procedures.
Full text 1,381 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Resident training and endoscopic hospital privileging - Magdy Milad - Robert Kim - Brian Cohen Laparoscopic techniques were originally confined to female sterilization. As both instrumentation and methodology improved, gynecological endoscopy was applied to more complex processes, including salpingostomy or salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy, and ovarian cystectomy or oophorectomy for benign conditions. Now, the laparoscopic treatment of adhesions, endometriosis and hysterectomy is almost commonplace. More sophisticated endoscopic procedures include the management of pelvic floor disease, incontinence and malignancies. However, at least two problems have become readily apparent: (i) there is often limited basic laparoscopic and hysteroscopic teaching during residency and fellowship training; and (ii) there is no standard by which to privilege or train physicians who may not have had any significant endoscopic training during residency. In this article we describe current learning theories and identify goals and specific objectives for residents in implementing a successful training program. We also discuss the mechanisms by which to privilege attending staff for gynecological procedures and the important clinical outcomes that can be improved. Finally, we raise concerns about creating algorithms by which to renew clinical privileges in endoscopic procedures.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Gynecology Internship and Residency Internship and Residency Laparoscopy Medical Staff Privileges Medical Staff Privileges Female Female Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Gynecology Gynecology Humans Humans Laparoscopy Laparoscopy United States United States

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-09T06:09:53.026058+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T20:59:59.992071+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine