Comparison of Sensitivity and Specificity of Structured and Narrative Reports of Transvaginal Ultrasonogaphy for Adenomyosis
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 8 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This study evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of structured versus narrative transvaginal ultrasonography reports for diagnosing adenomyosis.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Study objectiveTo compare the sensitivity and specificity of the transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) narrative report with those of the structured report for the diagnosis of adenomyosis.DesignRetrospective study.SettingA tertiary teaching hospital.PatientsOne hundred ninety-two patients (45 with adenomyosis and 147 controls) who underwent hysterectomy between 2012 and 2016 and were aged 30 years to 55 years, with available preoperative TVUS images, were included.InterventionsTo compare preoperative TVUS with histologic analysis of the uterus after hysterectomy for the diagnostic of adenomyosis.Measurements and main resultsData regarding the presence of the ultrasonographic characteristics previously described for the diagnosis of adenomyosis were obtained from the original TVUS report (narrative report) and the structured report from 2 blinded radiologists (R1 and R2). Histologic analysis is defined as the gold standard for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. The mean age (45.4 ± 5.3 years vs 44.9 ± 4.8 years; p = .496) and clinical symptoms were similar between the adenomyosis and control groups, except for dyspareunia, which was more frequently reported in the patients with adenomyosis (25.6% vs 9.4%; p = .006). Most of TVUS characteristics were more frequently observed in the structured reports than in the narrative reports. The structured report presented higher sensitivity (R1: 84.4%, R2: 69.1%; narrative report: 31.1%; p <.05) and lower specificity (R1: 28.0%, R2: 31.2%; narrative report: 90.5%; p <.05) for adenomyosis. The structured report presented higher sensitivity and lower specificity for most of sonographic characteristics evaluated. After logistic regression analysis, no sonographic characteristics presented with statistical significance for the diagnosis of adenomyosis on R1's structured report, while globular uterus (odds ratio [OR] 0.276; p = .006; 95% CI, 0.11-0.697) and poorly defined junctional zone (OR 3.6; p = .007; 95% CI, 1.4-9.2) were significantly associated with adenomyosis. In the narrative report, a myometrial cyst was associated with a higher risk of adenomyosis (odds ratio 9.486, p =.002; CI, 2.359-38.149).ConclusionThe narrative reports were more specific, whereas the structured reports were more sensitive for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. In addition, the sensitivity of most of sonographic feature of adenomyosis was higher and the specificity was lower in the structured report. Future prospective studies comparing both reports are needed to validate the current findings.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (24)
- Adenomyosis: via openalex
- Adenomyosis: A Clinical Review of a Challenging Gynecologic Condition via openalex
- Classification and Reporting Systems for Adenomyosis via openalex
- Diffuse uterine adenomyosis: morphologic criteria and diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal sonography. via openalex
- Gray scale ultrasonography in the diagnosis of endometriosis and adenomyosis via openalex
- Pathophysiology of adenomyosis via openalex
- Patients with adenomyosis are more likely to have deep endometriosis via openalex
- Prevalence and risk factors of adenomyosis at hysterectomy via openalex
- Question mark form of uterus: a simple sonographic sign associated with the presence of adenomyosis via openalex
- Question Mark Sign and Transvaginal Ultrasound Uterine Tenderness for the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis via openalex
- Sonographic findings in adenomyosis of the uterus via openalex
- Sonographic Findings in Patients with Adenomyosis: Can Sonography Assist in Predicting Extent of Disease? via openalex
- The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus—revisited via openalex
- Transvaginal Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis via openalex
- Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology via openalex
- Ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. via openalex
- Uterine Adenomyosis: Endovaginal US and MR Imaging Features with Histopathologic Correlation via openalex
- W6606237417 via openalex
- W2038354928 via openalex
- W6641528351 via openalex
- W2014463766 via openalex
- W1965039757 via openalex
- W2525448258 via openalex
- W2761304371 via openalex
Cited by (8)
- Value of serum muscular creatinine phosphokinase levels in patients with adenomyosis as a non-invasive diagnostic marker 2024
- Current Non-Invasive Imaging Techniques Used in the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis 2023
- Does coexistence of endometrial cancer and adenomyosis affect survival outcomes? A retrospective cohort study 2023
- 3D Ultrasonography Compared With Magnetic Resonance Imaging For The Diagnosis Of Adenomyosis 2023
- Sonographic features of adenomyosis correlated with clinical symptoms and intraoperative findings: a case-control study 2023
- Transabdominal 2-Dimensional Shear-Wave Elastography for Diagnostic Differentiation Between Adenomyosis Leiomyoma and Normal Myometrium 2023
- A Comparison of Shear Wave Elastography between Normal Myometrium, Uterine Fibroids, and Adenomyosis: A Cross-Sectional Study. 2022
- Sonographic Assessment of Uterine Biometry for the Diagnosis of Diffuse Adenomyosis in a Tertiary Outpatient Clinic 2022
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-07-26T06:08:39.051465+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:21:36.268089+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK