Comparison between laparotomy and operative laparoscopy in the treatment of moderate and severe stages of endometriosis.

International journal of fertility · 1991 · vol. 35(5) , pp. 272–9 · PMID:1980662 · W2415272194
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 13 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This study compared laparotomy and operative laparoscopy for endometriosis, finding laparoscopy achieved better cumulative pregnancy rates and less residual disease.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

A retrospective study was designed to compare the results of treatment of moderate and severe stages of endometriosis by laparotomy and by laparoscopy. Patients were divided into three groups: the first consisted of 42 patients treated by laparotomy followed immediately with danazol treatment for 6-9 months; the second, 44 patients treated by operative laparoscopy followed immediately with danazol treatment for 4-6 months; and the third, 62 patients treated by operative laparoscopy followed immediately with danazol treatment for 6-10 weeks. The cumulative pregnancy rate in the laparoscopy groups was better than that of the laparotomy group. Most patients who failed to conceive underwent a second-look laparoscopy for reevaluation. Residual endometriosis and associated adhesions were noticed least in the third group. It is concluded that operative laparoscopy could be efficiently used for the treatment of moderate or even severe endometriosis.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Laparoscopy Laparotomy Adult Combined Modality Therapy Danazol Danazol Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Ovarian Neoplasms Ovarian Neoplasms Pelvic Neoplasms Pelvic Neoplasms Retrospective Studies Uterine Neoplasms Uterine Neoplasms

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

Cited by (13)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:12:05.481982+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK