The role of hyaluronic acid binding assay in choosing the fertilization method for patients undergoing IVF for unexplained infertility.

OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-31 ⓘ

In patients with unexplained infertility undergoing IVF, the hyaluronic acid binding assay failed to predict spontaneous fertilization success or guide the selection between intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional in vitro fertilization.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PurposePatients with unexplained infertility may have fertilization problems. Split fertilization (ICSI and conventional IVF on sibling oocytes) is often used to avoid poor fertilization. Our aim was to assess the ability of hyaluronic acid binding (HA-binding) assay to predict spontaneous fertilization during IVF.MethodsProspective, blinded, controlled trial. Patients undergoing their first IVF cycle for unexplained infertility were eligible. Split fertilization was used. IVF and ICSI fertilization rates and embryo development based on 3 HA-binding cut-offs (80%) were compared.ResultsICSI fertilization was higher than IVF, but none of the HA-binding cut-off levels predicted those cases where IVF was less effective, therefore ICSI only would have lead to improved outcome. Embryo development and morphology were similar in all cut-off groups.ConclusionsHA-binding did not predict spontaneous fertilization in patients with unexplained infertility undergoing IVF treatment. When it was used for "screening" it did not help to select the method of fertilization.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

infertility

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (1)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-27T09:11:36.575535+00:00