Comparative efficacy of r-hFSH Alfa + r-LH versus r-hFSH delta + hMG in poor ovarian responders.

OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

IntroductionPoor ovarian response (POR) remains a major limitation in assisted reproductive medicine. Direct comparisons between r-hFSH alfa + r-LH and r-hFSH delta + hMG in this population are scarce.MethodsThis retrospective study included 437 POR patients treated between 2018 and 2022. Controlled ovarian stimulation involved either r-hFSH alfa + r-LH (Group A) or r-hFSH delta + hMG (Group B). After exclusions, 148 patients per group who reached embryo transfer were analyzed. Primary outcomes were total oocytes, metaphase II (MII) oocytes and embryos. Secondary outcomes included β-hCG positivity, clinical pregnancy and pharmacoeconomic evaluation.ResultsGroup A showed significantly higher numbers of oocytes (p=0.01), MII oocytes (p=0.02) and embryos (p=0.03). No significant differences in biochemical or clinical pregnancy were observed (OR 1.12; 95% CI: 0.79-1.59). The r-hFSH alfa + r-LH protocol required lower total gonadotropin doses and resulted in an average saving of €690 per additional MII oocyte.DiscussionThe r-hFSH alfa + r-LH regimen improved ovarian response and cost-efficiency without affecting pregnancy outcomes. Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm these results.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-13T06:15:24.848197+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Per Europe PMC