Cervical Endometriosis Mimicking Microinvasive Cervical Carcinoma: A Diagnostic Pitfall and Literature Review

Razvan Bobora, Ion Petre, Buleu F, Izabella Petre, Anca Bordianu, Marina Adriana Mercioni, Luciana Marc, Popa DI, Ionuţ Flaviu Faur, Tiberiu Buleu, Marius Furău, Cezar Laurențiu Tomescu
In: Life · 2026 · vol. 16(7) , pp. 1151 · doi:10.3390/life16071151 · W7168131615
article OA: gold CC0
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17 ⓘ

This case report describes a woman initially diagnosed with microinvasive cervical carcinoma who was ultimately found to have cervical endometriosis after hysterectomy, highlighting diagnostic challenges and potential for overtreatment.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Endometriosis of the cervix is a rare, non-cancerous disease that can look or behave like cancerous cervical tissue, causing challenges regarding diagnosis and management. Discrimination between benign and malignant lesions can be difficult when utilizing cytological, colposcopic, and histopathological data if the findings do not agree with each other. Case Presentation: We report the case of an asymptomatic 45-year-old woman who was initially diagnosed with FIGO stage IA1 microinvasive cervical carcinoma based on cytological, colposcopic, and conization findings. Further evaluation yielded persistent uncertainty in diagnostic imaging and, in addition, a concern for invasive cervical disease. Therefore, the patient underwent a total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and the result of the postoperative evaluation was cervical endometriosis without evidence of invasive malignancy. This example demonstrates the diagnostic challenges associated with rare benign cervical lesions, which may resemble cervical carcinoma, and emphasizes the high-risk for overtreatment due to the vagueness of these types of cases. Conclusions: When there is a discrepancy among clinical findings, cytology, and histopathology in suspicious cervical lesions, cervical endometriosis must be considered in the differential diagnosis. To increase accuracy in diagnosis and minimize the possibility of unnecessary radical treatment, careful histopathologic reevaluation and multidisciplinary assessment are necessary.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (21)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-07-26T06:00:49.253533+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK