[Failure factors in endometrial resection. 196 cases].

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 9 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

A retrospective study of 196 patients found hysteroscopic endometrial resection had an 82% success rate, with enlarged uterine size and adenomyosis significantly increasing failure risk.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Study of factors affecting risk of failure after hysteroscopic endometrial resection. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective study of 196 patients treated by hysteroscopic endometrial resection for abnormal uterine bleeding from January 1989 to December 1990. A survey was conducted in February 1993 to study the results of these interventions with a particular attention paid to the failure cases. RESULTS: The survey revealed a satisfaction rate of 82%. Persistence of abnormal bleeding after resection was the most common problem reported, although in 32% of these cases the bleeding began after a period of at least 2 years in remission. A more complete clinical and pathological study was performed in 22 cases of hysterectomy for failure after resection. Enlarged uterine size and presence of adenomyosis increase significantly the failure rates. CONCLUSION: After 2 or 4 years of follow-up, the results are satisfactory but the existence of late recurrences showed that it will be necessary to have long term reviews. Two major risk factors are enlarged uterine size and the presence of adenomyosis.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisadenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Diathermy Diathermy Endometriosis Endometrium Hysteroscopy Hysteroscopy Menorrhagia Metrorrhagia Adult Endometriosis Endometrium Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Hysterectomy Menorrhagia Menorrhagia Menorrhagia Menorrhagia Metrorrhagia

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

Cited by (9)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-16T06:07:01.518242+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:29.222973+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK