Can staging systems for endometriosis based on anatomic location and lesion type predict pregnancy rates?

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 19 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This retrospective study found that neither individual anatomic sites nor lesion types in endometriosis were sufficient on their own to predict pregnancy rates in infertile women.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Development of an endometriosis classification system based on empirically derived stages of the disease, to supplant the Acosta (1973), Kistner (1977), and American Fertility Society (1985) classifications, which are based on arbitrarily defined stages and often fail to predict pregnancy rates. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: University infertility clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with endometriosis and > or = 1 year of infertility. Diagnosis of endometriosis was made by direct visualization, with type of lesion (implant or adhesion) at multiple sites recorded; total of 202 patients. All diagnosed infertility problems were treated based on semen analysis, postcoital test, and endometrial biopsy. Pregnancy rates were analyzed by life-table and cluster analyses, and combinations of site and type were also analyzed by Cox's regression model. RESULTS: No individual anatomic site or type significantly affected prognosis, nor was any cluster useful for predicting outcome. CONCLUSION: Anatomic site and type of lesion are insufficient for predicting fertility when used as sole components of a clinical staging system for endometriosis.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Infertility, Female Adult Cluster Analysis Cohort Studies Computer Simulation Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Infertility, Female Life Tables Prognosis Regression Analysis Retrospective Studies Tissue Adhesions

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

Cited by (19)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:34.315996+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK