Advantages of the robotic approach to deep infiltrating rectal endometriosis: because less is more

For symptomatic deep infiltrating endometriosis, surgery is often required to achieve symptom relief and restore fertility. A minimally invasive approach using laparoscopy is considered the gold standard. However, specific limitations of the laparoscopic approach deep in the pelvis keep challenging even surgeons with a solid experience with minimally invasive techniques. Robotic surgery has the potential to compensate for technical drawbacks inherent in conventional laparoscopic surgery, such as limited degree of freedom, two-dimensional vision, and the fulcrum effect. In the present report, we aim at demonstrating the central role of robotic surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis, with special emphasis in the ability to practice organ (rectal) preservation. A 45-year-old white female with a 4-month history of chronic pelvic pain, dyschezia, and dysmenorrhea, refractory to hormonal therapy was referred to our unit. MRI findings were diagnostic of deep infiltrating endometriosis (retrocervical and rectovaginal) extending to the anterior rectal serosal layer (partial-thickness rectal invasion). Using a fully robotic approach, appropriate dissection of the rectovaginal septum and of the extraperitoneal rectum followed by complete excision of the endometriotic rectal nodule with organ (rectal) preservation was undertaken. It is our belief that using a robotic approach, the potential to boost rectal preservation might be established. Moreover, it is possible that in many cases, a robotic operation may allow the surgeon to perform the intervention with greater accuracy and comfort. As a result, more patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis may benefit from rectal sparing procedures.

Balasch J, Creus M, Fábregues F, Carmona F, Ordi J, Martinez-Román S et al (1996) Visible and non-visible endometriosis at laparoscopy in fertile and infertile women and in patients with chronic pelvic pain: a prospective study. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl 11:387–391 Leibson CL, Good AE, Hass SL, Ransom J, Yawn BP, O’Fallon WM et al (2004) Incidence and characterization of diagnosed endometriosis in a geographically defined population. Fertil Steril 82:314–321 Revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis (1985) Fertil Steril 43:351–352 Ruffo G, Sartori A, Crippa S, Partelli S, Barugola G, Manzoni A et al (2012) Laparoscopic rectal resection for severe endometriosis of the mid and low rectum: technique and operative results. Surg Endosc 26:1035–1040. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1991-8 Vercellini P, Pietropaolo G, De Giorgi O, Pasin R, Chiodini A, Crosignani PG (2005) Treatment of symptomatic rectovaginal endometriosis with an estrogen–progestogen combination versus low-dose norethindrone acetate. Fertil Steril 84:1375–1387 Abrão MS, Petraglia F, Falcone T, Keckstein J, Osuga Y, Chapron C (2015) Deep endometriosis infiltrating the recto-sigmoid: critical factors to consider before management. Hum Reprod Update 21:329–339. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv003 Ercoli A, D’asta M, Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Romano F, Baldazzi G et al (2012) Robotic treatment of colorectal endometriosis: technique, feasibility and short-term results. Hum Reprod 27:722–6. doi:10.1093/humrep/der444 Nezhat C, Lewis M, Kotikela S, Veeraswamy A, Saadat L, Hajhosseini B et al (2010) Robotic versus standard laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 94:2758–2760. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.031 Siesto G, Ieda N, Rosati R, Vitobello D (2014) Robotic surgery for deep endometriosis: a paradigm shift. Int J Med Robot 10:140–146. doi:10.1002/rcs.1518 Seracchioli R, Manuzzi L, Mabrouk M, Solfrini S, Frascà C, Manferrari F et al (2010) A multidisciplinary, minimally invasive approach for complicated deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil Steril 93(1007):e1–e3 Duffy JMN, Arambage K, Correa FJS, Olive D, Farquhar C, Garry R et al (2014) Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD011031. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011031.pub2 Daraï E, Ballester M, Chereau E, Coutant C, Rouzier R, Wafo E (2010) Laparoscopic versus laparotomic radical en bloc hysterectomy and colorectal resection for endometriosis. Surg Endosc 24:3060–3067. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1089-8 Goldberg JM, Falcone T (2003) Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis with and without robotic assistance. Hum Reprod 18:145–147 Pellegrino A, Damiani GR, Trio C, Faccioli P, Croce P, Tagliabue F et al (2015) Robotic shaving technique in 25 patients affected by deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectovaginal space. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22:1287–1292. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2015.06.002 Bush SH, Apte SM (2015) Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecological oncology. Cancer Control 22:307–313 Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of interest SEAA, VES, RMM, and MTVG declare that they have no potential (financial and no financial) conflict of interest. Ethical approval The present study was approved by the IRB at our Hospital. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case Report and the two accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal. Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Araujo, S.E.A., Seid, V.E., Marques, R.M. et al. Advantages of the robotic approach to deep infiltrating rectal endometriosis: because less is more. J Robotic Surg 10, 165–169 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0586-8 Received: Accepted: Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0586-8