Reply: Biochemical markers for endometriosis: a long way to go
letter
OA: bronze
CC0
⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This paper argues that current biochemical markers for endometriosis are insufficient and require significant improvement for effective diagnosis and management.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (3)
- Evaluation of a panel of 28 biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis 2012
- Can chemokines be used as biomarkers for endometriosis? A systematic review 2013
- Transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of deeply infiltrating endometriosis 2008
Cited by (2)
References (4)
- Can chemokines be used as biomarkers for endometriosis? A systematic review via openalex
- Evaluation of a panel of 28 biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis via openalex
- Transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of deeply infiltrating endometriosis via openalex
- W2134618546 via openalex
Cited by (2)
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:18:22.440000+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK