Nuances of diagnosis and management of patients with asymptomatic adenomyosis

In: Journal of obstetrics and women's diseases · 2026 · vol. 75(3) , pp. 59–70 · doi:10.17816/jowd708203 · W7168125300
article OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

This study found that asymptomatic adenomyosis patients, despite lacking typical symptoms, exhibited increased transitional zone thickness, poorer psychoemotional status, altered progesterone levels, and higher endometrial hyperplasia rates compared to controls.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic adenomyosis, which occurs in approximately one-third of patients, is a clinical and scientific enigma, thus being a subject of debate. Practicing physicians face unresolved questions: should they take no action or should they actively monitor and prescribe preventive therapy, especially in the context of preconception care? AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the psychoemotional status, hormonal profile (including oxytocin levels), ultrasound characteristics, and endometrial morphofunctional status in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic adenomyosis. METHODS: This prospective, observational, single-center cohort study was conducted at Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott, Saint Petersburg, Russia. A total of 641 patients were examined, including 574 women with adenomyosis in the main group and 67 women without gynecological diseases in the comparison group. The diagnosis of adenomyosis was established based on magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound using a patented method. The patients underwent an assessment of their psychoemotional status using the Quality of Life Questionnaire (SF-36), determination of serum follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and estradiol levels, as well as plasma oxytocin levels on days 2–6 of the menstrual cycle, and serum progesterone levels on days 19–23 of the menstrual cycle. Histological evaluation of endometrial samples was performed using standard methods on days 7–13 or 16–23 of the menstrual cycle. RESULTS: Of the 574 patients with adenomyosis in the main group, 530 women presented complaints (abnormal uterine bleeding, pain syndrome), 44 (7.6%) women being asymptomatic. The comparison group comprised 67 women without gynecological diseases. The age of the examined patients ranged from 20 to 48 years, with an average of 36 (7) years. In patients with adenomyosis, an increase in the transitional zone thickness was found in both subgroups, regardless of complaints. In patients with asymptomatic adenomyosis, the average transitional zone thickness was 2.84 (0.79) mm (95% CI 2.4–3.4), in patients with complaints 3.12 (1.21) mm (95% CI 3.0–3.3), and in the comparison group 1.50 (0.49) mm. In the group of patients with asymptomatic adenomyosis, we revealed a decrease in the psychoemotional state parameters, such as general physical well-being 56 (54, 57) points vs. 82 (79, 84) in the comparison group; general mental well-being 51 (45, 53) vs. 86 (86, 87) in the comparison group; mental health 70 (65, 72) vs. 91 (89, 92) in the comparison group; and vital activity 69 (13) vs. 81 (4), respectively. In patients with asymptomatic adenomyosis, the serum progesterone level was 10.77 nmol/L vs. 33.94 nmol/L in the comparison group. The plasma oxytocin level in asymptomatic patients was 134 (21) pg/mL, not differing from that in symptomatic patients 128 (31) pg/mL. In the comparison group, the plasma oxytocin level was lower 100 (33) pg/mL. According to the morphological assessment of the endometrium, only 63% of asymptomatic patients had endometrial histology consistent with the cycle phase. The incidence of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia in the asymptomatic group was 13%. CONCLUSION: Patients with asymptomatic adenomyosis demonstrate the absence of obvious symptoms of the disease (dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain syndrome, abnormal uterine bleeding). Frequent detection of endometrial hyperplasia in this group of patients and a decrease in the quality of life compared to women without gynecological diseases dictates the need for a thorough examination of such patients, more frequent follow-up, and joint patient management with related specialists.
Full text 10,679 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic adenomyosis, which occurs in approximately one-third of patients, is a clinical and scientific enigma, thus being a subject of debate. Practicing physicians face unresolved questions: should they take no action or should they actively monitor and prescribe preventive therapy, especially in the context of preconception care? AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the psychoemotional status, hormonal profile (including oxytocin levels), ultrasound characteristics, and endometrial morphofunctional status in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic adenomyosis.

Methods

This prospective, observational, single-center cohort study was conducted at Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott, Saint Petersburg, Russia. A total of 641 patients were examined, including 574 women with adenomyosis in the main group and 67 women without gynecological diseases in the comparison group. The diagnosis of adenomyosis was established based on magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound using a patented method. The patients underwent an assessment of their psychoemotional status using the Quality of Life Questionnaire (SF-36), determination of serum follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and estradiol levels, as well as plasma oxytocin levels on days 2–6 of the menstrual cycle, and serum progesterone levels on days 19–23 of the menstrual cycle. Histological evaluation of endometrial samples was performed using standard methods on days 7–13 or 16–23 of the menstrual cycle.

Results

Of the 574 patients with adenomyosis in the main group, 530 women presented complaints (abnormal uterine bleeding, pain syndrome), 44 (7.6%) women being asymptomatic. The comparison group comprised 67 women without gynecological diseases. The age of the examined patients ranged from 20 to 48 years, with an average of 36 (7) years. In patients with adenomyosis, an increase in the transitional zone thickness was found in both subgroups, regardless of complaints. In patients with asymptomatic adenomyosis, the average transitional zone thickness was 2.84 (0.79) mm (95% CI 2.4–3.4), in patients with complaints 3.12 (1.21) mm (95% CI 3.0–3.3), and in the comparison group 1.50 (0.49) mm. In the group of patients with asymptomatic adenomyosis, we revealed a decrease in the psychoemotional state parameters, such as general physical well-being 56 (54, 57) points vs. 82 (79, 84) in the comparison group; general mental well-being 51 (45, 53) vs. 86 (86, 87) in the comparison group; mental health 70 (65, 72) vs. 91 (89, 92) in the comparison group; and vital activity 69 (13) vs. 81 (4), respectively. In patients with asymptomatic adenomyosis, the serum progesterone level was 10.77 nmol/L vs. 33.94 nmol/L in the comparison group. The plasma oxytocin level in asymptomatic patients was 134 (21) pg/mL, not differing from that in symptomatic patients 128 (31) pg/mL. In the comparison group, the plasma oxytocin level was lower 100 (33) pg/mL. According to the morphological assessment of the endometrium, only 63% of asymptomatic patients had endometrial histology consistent with the cycle phase. The incidence of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia in the asymptomatic group was 13%.

Conclusion

Patients with asymptomatic adenomyosis demonstrate the absence of obvious symptoms of the disease (dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain syndrome, abnormal uterine bleeding). Frequent detection of endometrial hyperplasia in this group of patients and a decrease in the quality of life compared to women without gynecological diseases dictates the need for a thorough examination of such patients, more frequent follow-up, and joint patient management with related specialists. Full Text About the authors Maria A. Shalina The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott Author for correspondence. Email: [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5921-3217 SPIN-code: 6673-2660 MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine) Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgMaria I. Yarmolinskaya The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott Email: [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6551-4147 SPIN-code: 3686-3605 MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgGulrukhsor Kh. Tolibova The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott Email: [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6216-6220 SPIN-code: 7544-4825 MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine) Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgTatiana G. Tral The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott Email: [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8948-4811 SPIN-code: 1244-9631 MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine) Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences - Adenomyosis: an underacknowledged cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and pelvic pain. EBioMedicine. 2025;113:105656. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105656 EDN: CNQUEN - Chapron C, Vannuccini S, Santulli P, et al. Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach. Hum Reprod Update. 2020.15;26(3):392–411. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz049 EDN: YMOOXP - International working group of AAGL, ESGE, ESHRE and WES; Tomassetti C, Johnson NP, Petrozza J, et al. An international terminology for endometriosis, 2021. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(11):1849–1859. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.08.032 EDN: YCQXGO - Yarmolinskaya MI, Shalina MA, Nagorneva SV. Modern approaches to classification of adenomyosis. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2023;72(1):97–108. doi: 10.17816/JOWD121307 EDN: NZZPMZ - Munro MG, Critchley HO, Broder MS, et al. FIGO Working Group on Menstrual Disorders. FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;113(1):3–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.11.011 - Munro MG, Critchley HOD, Fraser IS; FIGO Menstrual Disorders Committee. The two FIGO systems for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding symptoms and classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: 2018 revisions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;143(3):393–408. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12666 - Patent RUS № RU2764106/ 13.01.2022. Nagorneva SV, Shalina MA, Yarmolinskaya MI, et al. Method of diagnosis of adenomyosis. Available from: https://patenton.ru/patent/RU2764106C1?ysclid=moctdb49zd267073198 (In Russ.) EDN: BCYRSL - Ware JЕ, Snow КК, Kosinski М, et al. Sf-36 Health Survey. Manuel and Interpretation Guide. QualityMetric; 2000:231. - Shalina MA, Yarmolinskaya MI, Netreba EA, Beganova AK. Psycho-emotional status in patients with endometriosis-associated pain syndrome in various disease phenotypes. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2023;72(3):53–64. doi: 10.17816/JOWD346683 EDN: XZRCQA - Azizova M. Pathomorphological and clinical characteristics of the uterus in combined adenomyosis and myoma. Georgian Med News. 2024;(355):123–127. - Bordonné C, Puntonet J, Maitrot-Mantelet L, et al. Imaging for evaluation of endometriosis and adenomyosis. Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2021;73(3):290–303. doi: 10.23736/S2724-606X.21.04710-9 EDN: QFGGUO - Arunachalam B, Manivasakan J. A clinico-pathologic study of adenomyosis. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2012;6(3):428–430. - Emmanuel I, Ochigbo A, Philip A, et al. Adenomyosis: a clinico-pathological study. West African Journal of Medicine. 2019;36(1):88–92. - Peterson BD, Sejbaek CS, Pirritano M, Schmidt L. Are severe depressive symptoms associated with infertility-related distress in individuals and their partners? Human reproduction. 2014;29(1):76–82. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det412 - Van den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone FP, et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(3):284–98. doi: 10.1002/uog.14806 - Yarmolinskaya MI, Shalina MA, Nagorneva SV. New possibilities of ultrasound diagnostics and modern strategy of drug therapy for adenomyosis. Farmateka. 2022;29(6):101–108. doi: 10.18565/pharmateca.2022.6.101-107 EDN: CVBLKM - Boychuk AV, Miklashevska OA, Khlibovska OI, et al. Comorbid pathology of the mammary glands and endometriosis: risk factors and prognosis. Wiad Lek. 2024;77(2):247–253. doi: 10.36740/WLek202402109 EDN: YZXFQV - Netreba EA. The role of oxytocin in the pathogenesis of adenomyosis and the justification of therapy with an oxytocin receptor antagonist based on an experimental model of the disease [dissertation]. Saint Petersburg; 2024. 131 р. Available from: https://www.dissercat.com/content/rol-oksitotsina-v-patogeneze-adenomioza-i-obosnovanie-terapii-antagonistom-oksitotsinovykh?ysclid=mpzbb18pjq679374227 (In Russ.) EDN: PTBXVG - Mechsner S, Grum B, Gericke C, et al. Possible roles of oxytocin receptor and vasopressin-1α receptor in the pathomechanism of dysperistalsis and dysmenorrhea in patients with adenomyosis uteri. Fertility and sterility. 2010;94(7):2541–2546. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.015 - Gruber TM, Ortlieb L, Henrich W, et al. Endometriosis and adenomyosis: implications on pregnancy and outcome. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021;11(1):157–160. doi: 10.3390/jcm11010157 - Wuo GS, Mao X, Ma Q, et al. Dysmenorrhea and its severity are associated with increased uterine contractility and overexpression of oxytocin receptor (OTR) in women with symptomatic adenomyosis. Fertility and Sterility. 2013;99(1):231–240. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.038 - Hang H, Li C, Li W, et al. Research advances in adenomyosis-related signaling pathways and promising targets. Biomolecules. 2024;14(11):1402. doi: 10.3390/biom14111402 EDN: YQDKWK - Che X, Wang J, Sun W, et al. Effect of mifepristone vs placebo for treatment of adenomyosis with pain symptoms: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(6):e2317860. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17860 EDN: JTMTBM

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (18)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-07-26T06:00:49.253533+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK