The Role of Social Media in Endometriosis: A Systematic Review of Users, Content, Information Quality, and Content Creators

Latini CM, Chiara Maria Latini, Cremonesi M, Monica Cremonesi, Meschia V, Valentina Meschia, Rosy Matrangolo, Matrangolo R, Coro I, Ilaria Coro, Mathew Leonardi, Leonardi M, Vignali M, Michele Vignali, M. Vignali, Paolo Vercellini, Vercellini P, Salmeri N, Noemi Salmeri
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · 2026 · vol. 33(10) , pp. 1448–1464.e4 · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2026.06.035 · PMID:42463040 · W7168761525
Systematic review / meta-analysis OA: hybrid public-domain-us
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-18 ⓘ

This systematic review found that social media serves as a crucial platform for endometriosis peer support and awareness but contains variable information quality, with most content generated by non-healthcare professionals.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review qualitative and quantitative evidence on the role of social media (SM) in endometriosis awareness and disease management. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus up to December 28, 2025. METHODS: Original studies investigating the role of SM in endometriosis were included. Exclusion criteria comprised nonoriginal articles, non-English publications, analyses limited to single webpages, and studies lacking relevant data. Methodological quality of individual studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. Four domains were examined: (i) characteristics of SM users, (ii) types of content shared, (iii) information quality, and (iv) type of content creators. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Twenty-one studies performed SM content analyses, while 5 used surveys/interviews. SM users were predominantly young women and frequently reported psychological burden, diagnostic delays (>10 years), and negative healthcare experiences. The most commonly reported SM themes were personal experiences (n = 15), symptoms (n = 11), infertility/fertility concerns (n = 10), disease management and treatments (n = 14), emotional support and advocacy (n = 14), and distrust toward healthcare professionals (HCPs) (n = 9). Dysmenorrhea was the most frequently discussed symptom, while surgery, hormonal therapies, and complementary treatments represented the main treatment-related topics. Overall information quality was heterogeneous, with approximately 23% to 30% of content containing misinformation, particularly regarding treatments and alternative therapies. Ten studies evaluated content creators: non-HCPs generated most SM content (80%-95%) and generally showed higher engagement, whereas HCP-generated content demonstrated greater accuracy, reliability, and educational quality. CONCLUSIONS: Social media play a key role in endometriosis awareness and disease management by providing peer support. However, information quality is variable and often suboptimal. Greater involvement of healthcare professionals is needed to improve reliability and counterbalance misinformation.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Social Media Social Media Social Media Digital Media Digital Media Digital Media Female Female Female Humans Humans Humans

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (52)

SciLite annotations

organisms 1
noordeloos 2009062

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-11T09:27:45.537177+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-09-30T06:08:52.026869+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-11T06:07:40.028443+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-07-19T09:54:07.271699+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-05T06:29:56.012541+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine