Limitations
due to its restricted field of view, particularly
in lateral compartments —its limited contrast resolution
in subperitoneal space, and its operator dependence [ 7].
In this context, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is
considered the imaging modality of choice. It allows
assessment and detailed mapping of the extent and
severity of neural endometriosis, which can alter the
medical and surgical management of patients [ 8].
The management of these patients is inherently com-
plex and typically requires a multidisciplinary approach to
Bourg et al . Insights into Imaging (2025) 16:131 Page 2 of 16
determine the optimal treatment strategy. It often
involves a combination of hormonal therapy, surgery, and
pain management. When surgery is decided upon,
laparoscopic surgery —frequently assisted by robotic
technology—is preferred for cases involving sacral nerve
roots and pelvic nerves [ 9].
This article provides a comprehensive review of the
pathophysiology of neural endometriosis, proposes an
optimized MRI protocol tailored for the evaluation of
pelvic nerves, and highlights key anatomical landmarks
crucial for the accurate detection and analysis of each
nerve. Finally, it outlines the key MRI features of endo-
metriotic neural involvement that should be reported for
effective surgical planning.
Physiopathology of neural endometriosis
DE is strongly associated with pelvic pain, severe dys-
menorrhea, and deep dyspareunia [ 10]. Among women
with chronic pelvic pain, the prevalence of endometriosis
is estimated at approximately 70% [ 11]. This persistent
pain is often the most debilitating symptom, signi ficantly
impacting women ’s quality of life. Depending on the role
of the nerve fibers, somatic and vegetative symptoms such
as pain, weakness, numbness, bladder and rectal dys-
function may occur [ 12]. Since pelvic nerve endometriosis
is a rare clinical presentation, it is often overlooked by
practitioners. The cyclical nature of catamenial symp-
toms, when present, can be a critical diagnostic clue and
should alert the practitioner.
However, the mechanisms underlying endometriosis-
associated pain remain poorly understood. Nerve fibers
are believed to play a central role in both the initiation
and modulation of pelvic pain in women with endome-
triosis. Increasing evidence suggests that endometriotic
lesions exhibit heightened neural density [ 13]. Through
this process known as neuroangiogenesis, ectopic endo-
metriotic implants establish their own distinct neural
and vascular networks [ 13]. These lesions engage in
bidirectional interactions with sensory, sympathetic, and
parasympathetic fibers, promoting in flammation, angio-
genesis, proliferation, and further innervation. This
crosswalk may contribute to the development of the dis-
ease. It is thought to affect neuronal activity in the central
nervous system, increasing pain perception [ 14].
Additionally, ectopic endometrial cells may directly
invade or irritate peripheral nerves, contributing to pain
[10]. However, the retroperitoneal course of pelvic nerves
raises questions about the unclear pathogenesis of endo-
metriosis. Sampson ’s theory of retrograde menstruation
suggests that menstrual re flux allows endometrial cells to
implant on peritoneal surfaces with peritoneal diverticula
facilitating their migration into adjacent nerves [ 15, 16].
Pelvic peritoneal pockets —either formed secondarily
through endometriosis-induced in flammation and scar-
ring or existing as primary retraction defects —may serve
as reservoirs for ectopic tissue. These defects are com-
monly found in areas such as the pouch of Douglas or
posterior ovarian fossa, with a potential extension towards
retroperitoneal tissues like the sciatic notch [ 17]. A
notable right-sided predominance of sciatic nerve invol-
vement may be attributed to the peritoneal fluid flow and
the anatomical location of the sigmoid colon, which limit
cell re flux into the left posterior hemipelvis pockets, thus
protecting the left lumbosacral plexus and the sciatic
nerve [ 18].
However, this theory does not explain cases of distant
extrapelvic endometriosis or those without peritoneal
involvement. In such cases, the perineural spread theory,
proposed by Possover et al and Siquera et al, offers an
alternative explanation, supported by MRI and surgical
evidence [19, 20]. This theory suggests that endometriosis
can disseminate along pelvic autonomic nerves —similar
to the perineural spread observed in pelvic malignancies —
extending from the uterine plexus to the lumbosacral
plexus. As no single theory can explain all the manifes-
tations of endometriosis, multiple mechanisms are likely
at play. Hypotheses such as hematogenous or lymphatic
spread, coelomic metaplasia, and embryonic cell rest, are
also considered [ 4, 21].
Either way, neural endometriosis can compress, distort,
or infiltrate the epineural tissue, possibly leading to nerve
entrapment and fibrosis. In addition, local edema around
DE lesions may contribute to symptoms even in the
absence of direct neural in filtration [ 22].
Treatment principles
Regardless of the route of pelvic nerve involvement in
endometriosis, early diagnosis and treatment of neural
endometriosis are crucial to prevent irreversible nerve
damage caused by chronic in flammation, fibrosis, and
adhesions. Management is based on a multidisciplinary
approach, integrating clinical symptoms and MRI fea-
tures. Medical management is based on GnRH analogs,
analgesics, tricyclic antidepressants, and antiepileptics
[23]. When conservative treatments fail to relieve pain
symptoms and impact patients ’ quality of life, surgery
becomes the method of choice. The laparoscopic retro-
peritoneal approach with nerve-sparing technique and
somatic nerve decompression is considered the gold
standard for appropriate surgical radicality [ 24]. Possover
et al introduced the concept of laparoscopic neuronavi-
gation, a parasympathetic nerve-sparing technique based
on nerve electrostimulation [ 25].
Finally, pelvic pain management must be comprehensive,
addressing the multifactorial and often interrelated factors
of pain. Endometriosis is particularly associated with
Bourg et al . Insights into Imaging (2025) 16:131 Page 3 of 16
myofascial pain, due to active myofascial trigger points,
which can amplify and perpetuate chronic pain [ 26].
MRI protocol
Standard optimized MRI protocol
MRI is the reference technique for diagnosing neural
endometriosis and offers a comprehensive roadmap for
assessing DE, which is crucial for preoperative decision
making. The MRI protocol should follow the European
Society of Urogenital Radiology and the Society of
Abdominal Radiology guidelines [ 27, 28]. Imaging can be
performed on a 1.5- or 3-Tesla MRI system, though 3T-
MRI may present limitations such as increased speci fic
absorption rate and susceptibility artifacts [ 29]. Both
societies recommend moderate bladder distension and
the administration of an anti-peristaltic agent to minimize
bowel motion artefacts. The core protocol should include
T2-weighted (T2W) MRI sequences in two or three
planes and T1-weighted (T1W) MRI. However, conven-
tional sequences may be insuf ficient for detecting pelvic
nerve involvement due to their long course and small
caliber. In this context, 3D sequences with multiplanar
reformats are valuable for their high spatial resolution.
The use of 3D-T2W MRI sequences is increasingly
common for the evaluation of deep pelvic endometriosis,
particularly for improved assessment of the lateral com-
partments [ 30]. These sequences also enhance visualiza-
tion of nerves, which often have an oblique course.
The 3D DIXON technique is currently the reference
standard for T1W imaging. Non-fat-suppressed T1W MR
images allow clear identi fication of nerves surrounded by
hyperintense perineural fat, and help assess their anato-
mical relationships. In contrast, fat-suppressed T1W MR
images are essential for detecting T1W-hyperintense
hemorrhagic cystic foci/lesions surrounding or within
the nerve.
Although gadolinium injection is not routinely recom-
mended for the evaluation of pelvic endometriosis, it may
be bene ficial when pelvic nerve involvement is suspected
[22]. Contrast-enhanced T1W fat-suppressed MRI can
facilitate the detection of DE surrounding the pelvic
nerve. However, the extent of the lesion may be over-
estimated due to perilesional in flammation.
Advanced MRI protocol
In addition to this optimized MRI protocol, other tech-
niques may be considered for more advanced analysis.
MR neurography can be used to identify pelvic nerve
abnormalities caused by endometriosis [ 31]. It is based on
high T2W imaging with fat suppression and vascular
suppression (mainly veins) to enhance nerve signal
intensity, which is clearly visible due to endoneurial fluid.
Both non-contrast techniques and gadolinium-based
contrast agents can be used to suppress the vascular
signal, with gadolinium reducing the T1 relaxation time of
blood to match that of fat tissues [ 32]. Multiplanar
reconstruction and maximum intensity projection tech-
niques aid in detecting focal nerve abnormalities. This
sequence, which adds approximately 8 min to the imaging
time, can be an optional add-on sequence when neural
endometriosis is clinically suspected or requires re-
evaluation [ 22]. It provides a detailed 3D view which
may be helpful in procedure planning, but can also help to
better visualize and track the involved nerve, assess its
degree of interruption, and help to better see muscle
atrophy, if present. Muscle evaluation should focus on size
asymmetry—larger, edematous muscles indicate acute
denervation, while smaller, fatty muscles indicate chronic
denervation atrophy [ 33].
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is an advanced MRI
technique that assesses microstructural nerve abnormal-
ities. It primarily assesses the integrity of fiber tracts,
measuring fractional anisotropy, an index of the archi-
tectural organization of tissue [ 34]. Tractography can also
provide neural tracts on three-dimensional (3D) images.
Although clinical research is limited, DTI seems to be a
promising technique to evaluate nerve abnormalities in
endometriosis; lower fractional anisotropy values have
been found in women with endometriosis compared to
healthy controls, suggesting microarchitectural abnorm-
alities in the affected sacral roots [ 35, 36].
MRI features and key findings for pelvic nerve
involvement to report in endometriosis
Accurate identi fication and a structured reporting of
pelvic nerve endometriosis in the lateral compartments
are crucial for guiding surgical decision making and
optimizing patient outcomes (Table 1 and Fig. 1)[ 37].
Neural endometriosis lesions typically appear on MRI
similarly to other DE lesions, presenting as T2-
hypointense solid nodules or fibrotic thickenings. These
lesions, may also show microcystic or hemorrhagic foci,
indicative of active ectopic glandular tissue, and often
involve the pelvic nerve, which may appear thickened,
interrupted, or encased.
Inferior hypogastric plexus
The inferior hypogastric plexus is the most commonly
affected structure within the lateral compartments in
endometriosis [ 38]. This complex neural network pro-
vides autonomic innervation of the pelvic viscera. It is
formed by the convergence of the hypogastric nerves
(which arise from the superior hypogastric plexus), the
pelvic splanchnic nerves (which arise from the anterior
branches of the sacral roots S2 –S4) and the sacral
splanchnic nerves (which arise from the sacral
Bourg et al . Insights into Imaging (2025) 16:131 Page 4 of 16
sympathetic trunk at the S2 and S3 ganglia) [ 39]. The
inferior hypogastric plexus branches into two main
pathways: the anterolateral branch, which innervates the
uterus and lower bladder, and a posteromedial branch,
which targets the posterolateral aspect of the rectum and
gives rise to the inferior rectal plexus [ 39].
The inferior hypogastric plexus spans from anterior to
posterior through the later al compartments, within the
Table 1 Pelvic nerve endometriosis: anatomical landmarks, MRI features, and key points for surgical planning
KEY ANATOMICAL LANDMARKS MRI FEATURES KEY POINTS FOR SURGICAL
PLANNING
INFERIOR
HYPOGASTRIC
PLEXUS
Mediolateral parametrium
Posterolateral parametrium containing the
sacrorectal septum: lateral to the mesorectal
fascia and beneath the uterosacral ligament
and the ureter.
Fibrotic nodular in filtration, more or less
spiculated, with the loss of the normal aspect
of the subperitoneal paracervical
cellulovascular tissue and the pararectal
cellular layer
Relationships of the
endometriosis lesion with:
- Ureter and uterine artery
- Sacral roots
- Levator ani muscle
- Pelvic fascia, piriformis muscle
- Gluteal and internal iliac
vessels
- Sciatic nerve
SACRAL ROOTS - Anterior to the piriformis muscle
- Indentation within the muscle for S2 and S3
Fibrotic thickening of the sacral roots (mostly
S3 and S4) in continuity with the in filtration of
the posterolateral parametrium
- Extension along the nerve
root up to the foramen
- Relationship with the
presacral fascia
SCIATIC NERVE - Anterior to the piriformis muscle
- Greater sciatic notch, above and outside the
ischial spine
Endometriotic in filtration extending from the
ovarian fossa towards the sciatic notch, or in a
more isolated manner, without other pelvic
identifiable endometriosis lesion
Thickening with the loss of “spaghetti-like”
appearance of the sciatic nerve, often with
hemorrhagic cystic foci
- Size of the lesion
- Extrapelvic extension through
the greater sciatic foramen
- Intrinsic or extrinsic
involvement
- Relationship to the obturator
nerve and the inferior gluteal
vessels
- Muscle denervation
PUDENDAL NERVE - Origin: anterior to mid-course of the
piriformis muscle
- Middle course: ischial spine, between the
sacrotuberous and sacrospinous ligaments,
then entering Alcock ’ s canal
- Terminal course: ischiorectal fossa at the end
of Alcock ’ s canal, following the pudendal
vascular pedicle
At three different levels:
- Proximal nerve involvement in continuity
with the in filtration of posterolateral
parametrium and S3/S4 nerves
- Fibrotic thickening at the entrance of
Alcock’ s canal
- Fibrotic thickening in the perineal region
adjacent to the episiotomy scar
Relationships of the
endometriosis lesion with:
- Levator ani muscle
- Obturator internus muscle
- Vagina and anal canal (in case
of extensive lesion in the
perineal region)
OBTURATOR NERVE
(Rare)
- Medial border of the psoas muscle
- Pelvic brim
- Obturator foramen
Extension of a large endometriosis lesion from
the ovarian fossa going through the
mediolateral parametrium up to the obturator
nerve
Retractile fibrotic in filtration with possible
hemorrhagic cystic areas along the pelvic wall,
tracking the course of the nerve
Relationships of the
endometriosis lesion with:
- Ureter
- Obturator internus muscle
- Muscle denervation
FEMORAL NERVE
(Rare)
- Lateral border of the psoas muscle
- Between the psoas and iliacus muscles
- Under the inguinal ligament, following the
round ligament in the canal
Infiltrating retractile tissue either in the region
iliopsoas muscle or in the inguinal region
(adjacent to the distal round ligament)
Relationships of the
endometriosis lesion with the:
- Inguinal canal
- Common femoral artery and
vein
Bourg et al . Insights into Imaging (2025) 16:131 Page 5 of 16
mediolateral and posterola teral parametrium (Supple-
mental Fig. 1) [ 40, 41]. It is located below the ureter and
deep uterine vein, both of which serve as important
landmarks during surgery [ 39]. It is typically character-
ized by a roughly triangular con figuration with a pos-
terior base (Supplemental Fig. 2) [ 40]. The sympathetic
contingent (from the hypogastric nerves and S2 –S3
ganglia) relaxes the detrusor muscle, contracts the
internal urethral and anal sphincters, promoting con-
tinence. In contrast, the parasympathetic contingent
(from the pelvic splanchnic nerves) stimulates the
detrusor contraction, faci litating bladder emptying,
and modulates the enteric nervous system of the left
colon [ 40].
Thus, inferior hypogastric plexus involvement usually
presents with vegetative symptoms such as bladder or
rectal dysfunction (e.g., dysuria, bladder fullness, dysche-
zia) and vaginal dryness. Sometimes, catamenial sciatica
occurs due to traction on the sacral roots via connecting
splanchnic fibers. The plexus itself is not visible on MRI
due to its complex, spiderweb-like structure. Therefore,
understanding its relationship with the pelvic viscera and
key anatomical landmarks is crucial. MRI typically shows
infiltration from a large retrocervical lesion (torus uter-
inum and the proximal and/or distal uterosacral liga-
ments) to the sacrorectal septum of the posterolateral
parametrium, with possible associated involvement of the
mediolateral parametrium [ 42]. These lesions are often
severe, with involvement of the rectal wall [ 43]. On MRI,
they present as fibrotic nodular in filtration with low signal
intensity on T2W, and loss of the normal aspect of the
subperitoneal pararectal cellular sheet beneath the uter-
osacral ligament level and lateral to the mesorectal fascia
[38]. Spiculated margins, particularly visible in the sagittal
plane, allow assessment of the posterior extension to the
sacral roots and deep extension to the iliococcygeus
muscle of the levator ani (Fig. 2)[ 38]. Preoperative MRI is
crucial for predicting postoperative complications, as
excision of these lesions can lead to urinary and rectal
dysfunctions, often due to damage to the inferior hypo-
gastric plexus [ 44]. The MRI report should specify the
Fig. 2 DE in a 29-year-old woman with dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, and dyschezia. A Axial and ( B) sagittal T2W MR images show a right
subperitoneal in filtrative lesion (dotted lines) involving the anterolateral rectal wall and extending to the mesorectal fascia ( A, white arrowhead) and
beyond into the right posterolateral parametrium. The in filtration of the inferior hypogastric plexus shows spiculated margins ( B, black arrows) but no
extension to the sacral roots or the pelvic wall ( A, dashed arrow). Note the safety fat line between the lesion and the iliococcygeus muscle of the levator
ani muscle ( B, white arrows). Laparoscopic surgery con firms the involvement of the inferior hypogastric plexus and a cleavage plane with the levator ani
muscle and sacral roots
Fig. 1 Anatomical illustration of somatic and autonomic pelvic nerves in
a female pelvis (frontal view, adapted from Alkatout et al [ 37]). 1: inferior
hypogastric plexus, 2: hypogastric nerve, 3: sympathetic trunk with chain
of ganglia, 4: sacral roots (S1 –S4), 5: sciatic nerve, 6: pudendal nerve, 7:
obturator nerve, and 8: femoral nerve
Bourg et al . Insights into Imaging (2025) 16:131 Page 6 of 16
distance and relationship of the endometriosis lesion to
the ureter and uterine artery anterolaterally, to the sacral
roots posteriorly, to the levator ani muscle inferiorly and
the parietal pelvic fascia laterally, extending to the pir-
iformis muscle and the branches of the gluteal and/or
internal iliac vessels [ 38]. Extension to the sciatic nerve is
rare.
Sacral plexus
The sacral plexus, formed by the L4 –S4 ventral rami, runs
along the anterior surface of the piriformis muscle and
serves as a significant anatomical landmark [45]. It provides
motor and sensory innervation to the pelvis and the lower
limbs.
On MRI, the sacral roots, although decreasing in caliber
from S1 to S4, are well traced at the level of the foramen and at
least in their proximal course (Supplemental Figs. 3 and 4).
They extend inferiorly, above, through, or below the piriformis
muscle and then towards the greater ischial notch, except for
S4. The S2 and S3 nerve roots pass through the piriformis
muscle in most cases [ 46], with an indentation within the
muscle, which facilitates their visualization. However, in the
distal course, the S3 and S4 roots are not or barely visible.
The symptomatology is polymorphic and depends on
the affected sacral roots. It may include pudendal and
gluteal pain, sciatica, pelvic organ dysfunctions such as
bladder hyperactivity, urinary urgency, constipation, and
dyschezia [ 47].
Sacral plexus involvement typically results from direct
infiltration by a large retrocervical lesion with posterior
extension to the inferior hypogastric plexus and then
through the connecting pelvic splanchnic nerves.
On MRI, sacral roots may appear thickened with
fibrotic in filtration, extending continuously with the
sacrorectal septum in filtration. It mainly affects the roots
S3 and S4 due to their lower, more posterior course
(Fig. 3), whereas S1 and S2 are generally located above the
endometriotic extension (Fig. 4)[ 47]. While surgical
findings often reveal endometriotic traction or extrinsic
involvement, accurately assessing the degree of in filtration
on MRI remains challenging due to the small caliber of
these sacral roots [ 12].
Fig. 3 DE in a 42-year-old woman, with a history of rectal shaving 10 years ago, who presented with a recurrence of symptoms, in particular deep
dyspareunia and right sciatica. A, B Axial T2 and ( C) sagittal T2W MR images show right subperitoneal in filtrative lesion involving the anterolateral rectal
wall ( B, arrowhead), extending to the right posterolateral parametrium with inferior hypogastric plexus involvement (stars), up to the pelvic wall with
encasement of hypogastric vessels ( A, B, dashed arrows) and contact with the piriformis muscle. The posterior spiculated margins come into contact
with the S3 and S4 sacral roots ( C, arrows) and the posterior part of the right sciatic nerve ( B, circle). D Axial fat-suppressed T1W MR image reveals T1-
hyperintense endometriotic hemorrhagic microcysts (arrows). The surgical procedure con firmed extrinsic involvement and included a shaving of the
right sacral roots and right sciatic nerve, as well as a section of the hypogastric vessels
Bourg et al . Insights into Imaging (2025) 16:131 Page 7 of 16
Fig. 4 Severe endometriosis in a 31-year-old woman with dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and dysesthesia in the right lower extremity. A–C Axial 3D
T2W images from top to bottom show endometriotic in filtration of the rectal wall ( C, arrowhead) and posterior vaginal fornix ( C,s t a r ) ,w i t hc o m p l e t e
extension to the right posterolateral parametrium including the inferior hypogastric plexus (black dashed arrows) with posterior attraction of S1 and
circumferential involvement of S2, S3 and S4. Note the absence of extension of the ureter ( B, C, white dashed arrow), the piriformis muscle, or
internal iliac vessels. D Sagittal 3D reconstruction T2W image at the level of the right posterolateral parametrium showing involvement of the
inferior hypogastric plexus (star) extending inferiorly to the levator ani muscle (dashed arrow), and posteriorly to sacral roots S2, S3, and S4, and with
spiculation up to S1 but no involvement. E The robotic laparoscopic view shows a complete adhesion (white arrows) between the anterior rectal
wall (star), the uterus and vagina, the peritoneal in filtration is being subperitoneal (dotted line). Note the hypogastric nerve (black arrow) passing
through the inferior hypogastric plexus affected by the endometriosis and the course of the ureter (dashed arrows) distant from the endometriotic
lesion. F The robotic laparoscopic photography view shows, after careful dissection, the upper part of the endometriotic lesion (dotted line)
involving the rectal wall (star), S2, and partially attracting S1. Note the course of the ureter (dashed arrow). G Robotic laparoscopic view showing,
after dissection of the endometriotic lesion (dotted line) from the rec tal wall, involvement of the posterior vaginal fornix with a submucous
hemorrhagic cystic component (arrow) after colpotomy, of S2, S3, and S4 and retraction of S1. Note the absence of involvement of the piriformis
muscle (star). A complete nerve-sparing resection was performed, with S1 being retracted but removable from the lesion, and S2 –S4 being
circumscribed but without macroscopic intrinsic in filtration
Bourg et al . Insights into Imaging (2025) 16:131 Page 8 of 16
Rarely, neural extension may progress along the sacral
roots to the foramen, which can be better visualized on
multiplanar sagittal plane reconstruction, especially in
cases of hemorrhagic implants (Supplemental Fig. 5). In
such cases, the lesion ’s relationship with the foramen and
the presacral fascia should be reported.
Sciatic nerve
The sciatic nerve, the largest peripheral nerve in the body,
arises from the convergence of the ventral roots of L4 –S3,
anterior to the piriformis muscle. It exits the pelvis
through the greater sciatic foramen, curves posteriorly
above and out of the ischial spine, and runs laterally along
to the common hamstring tendon between the ischial
tuberosity and the greater trochanter [ 45]. It supplies
motor innervation to the posterior thigh muscles and
sensory innervation to the lower limb, except for the
medial part.
On MRI, the sciatic nerve is clearly visible on both sides
of the greater sciatic notch, with a “spaghetti-like”
appearance. While its course is well traced in the axial
plane, the coronal plane appears to be more relevant for
detailed assessment (Supplemental Fig. 6).
The hallmark symptom is a cyclic sciatica associated
with menstruation, and progressively shorter pain-free
intervals. Patients usually report posterior thigh pain
radiating down to the limb and the foot, sometimes
accompanied by muscle weakness (foot drop), sensory
loss, and re flex alterations [ 48].
Sciatic nerve involvement is typically identi fied at the
sciatic notch [ 22]. It may result from endometriotic
infiltration extending from the ovarian fossa towards the
sciatic notch, or in a more isolated manner, without other
identifiable pelvic endometriotic lesions. Isolated cases
could be explained by the presence of a peritoneal
diverticulum (pocket sign) [ 49] or the theory of perineural
spread, especially in the absence of other endometriosis
lesions.
MRI typically reveals fibrotic in filtration of the sciatic
nerve, often with hemorrhagic cystic foci, leading to
thickening and loss of its characteristic “spaghetti-like”
appearance. In cases of chronic nerve involvement, fatty
muscle atrophy may be observed, affecting muscles
innervated by the sciatic nerve, such as those of the
posterior thigh, leg, and foot [ 6, 50]. Atrophy also may
affect the glutal and piriformis muscles, which are
innervated by the posterior branches of the sacral plexus
and have a close anatomical relationship to the sciatic
nerve at the level of the greater sciatic notch. Similarly,
the internal obturator muscle, innervated by the anterior
branches of the sacral plexus, may be involved (Fig. 5).
Muscle atrophy is mainly non-reversible and has a sig-
nificant impact on the functional prognosis [ 51].
Assessing intrinsic or extrinsic nerve involvement
remains challenging on MRI. However, intraneural
endometriosis may be suspected when the sciatic nerve
appears abnormally thickened and hyperintense on
T2W MR images, with visible interruption and fiber dis-
continuity (Fig. 6)[ 50].
In the preoperative assessment, it is crucial to report the
lesion’s size, its relationship to the obturator nerve and
the inferior gluteal vessels, and most importantly, its
relationship to the greater sciatic notch and any extra-
pelvic extension through the greater sciatic foramen.
Indeed such cases, a combined laparoscopic and trans-
gluteal approach may be necessary to achieve complete
excision of the lesion and adequate neurolysis (or
decompression) of the sciatic nerve [ 52].
Fig. 5 DE in a 31-year-old woman with right catamenial sciatica. A Axial T2W MR image shows fibrotic thickening in the right sciatic notch involving the
right sciatic nerve (circle) with loss of its spaghetti aspect compared to the left sciatic nerve (arrow). This lesion is isolated without involvemen t of the
ovarian fossa or the sacrorectal septum, and could illustrate the potential existence of a peritoneal diverticulum. Note the hypertrophy of the piri formis
muscle (star). B Axial fat-suppressed T1W MR image shows diffuse T1-hyperintense endometriotic hemorrhagic microcysts (dashed arrow). C Axial T2W
MR image shows fatty atrophy of the right obturator internus muscle (black arrow), indicating a concomitant involvement of the nerve to the obturator
internus muscle passing through the sciatic notch. The patient was medically treated with an LHRH analog
Bourg et al . Insights into Imaging (2025) 16:131 Page 9 of 16
In most cases, the nerves are embedded but not infiltrated
within the epineurium, and complete release results in sig-
nificant or complete relief of pain and motor issues [ 53].
However, if the lesion in filtrates the nerves within the epi-
neurium, excision may involve the nerve itself, thereby
increasing the complexity of surgery. Patients are more likely
to experience neuropathic pain and sensorimotor disorders
after surgery. Most patients w ith isolated sciatic nerve
endometriosis who present motor symptoms, such as foot
drop, experience little to no significant improvement [9, 53].
Pudendal nerve
The pudendal nerve is formed by the ventral rami of the
S2-S4 nerve roots. It has a short intrapelvic course and
exits the pelvis through the greater sciatic foramen,
between the piriformis muscle and the ischio-coccygeal
ligament. It then curves medially along and under the
ischial spine before re-entering the pelvis through the
lesser sciatic foramen. It joins the internal pudendal ves-
sels and runs along the lateral ischiorectal fossa within the
pudendal (Alcock ’s) canal, bounded by the obturator
fascia [ 45]. The pudendal nerve provides motor innerva-
tion to the levator ani muscle, clitoral muscles, external
anal and urethral sphincters, as well as sensory innerva-
tion of the perineum and anus [ 54].
Even with 3DT2 sequences, the proximal pudendal
nerve is not easily visualized. It is necessary to identify
anatomical landmarks of its course in order to accurately
diagnose its involvement. Namely, the nerve emerges at
the junction of the middle and distal third of the pir-
iformis muscle, then passes through an anatomical win-
dow between the sacrotuberous and sacrospinous
ligaments. In Alcock ’s canal, the pudendal vascular pedi-
cle serves as the landmark (Supplemental Fig. 7).
Pudendalgia presents as perineal pain or burning sen-
sation, often worsened by sitting. Other symptoms, such
as dyspareunia, dyschezia, or dysuria, are also commonly
reported.
The pudendal nerve is primarily involved at three dif-
ferent levels.
At the level of the piriformis muscle, proximal pudendal
nerve involvement may result from in filtration of the
inferior hypogastric plexus, with posterior extension to
the S3 and/or S4 roots (Fig. 7).
At the level of the pelvic wall near the ischial spine, at
the entrance of Alcock ’s canal, mid-course of the
Fig. 6 DE in a 31-year-old woman with right sciatica initially cyclical, then became chronic with walking difficulties. A Axial and (B) coronal T2W MR images
show an infiltrative endometriotic mass of 5 cm (measure not shown) (dotted line) centered on the right sciatic notch with involvement of the sciatic nerve.
Note the hypertrophy of the piriformis muscle (A, star). C Axial fat-suppressed T2W MR image shows denervation of the gluteus medius and minimus muscles
(stars), indicating the involvement of the superior gluteal nerve in the sciatic notch, as well as the piriformis muscle. D Axial fat-suppressed T1W MR image
shows a right-sided endometrioma (arrow) and hemorrhagic implants of the left ovary (dashed arrow). Surgical intervention was not possible due to th e
intrinsic involvement of the sciatic nerve, which could risk nerve damage. The patient was treated medically with an LHRH analog
Bourg et al . Insights into Imaging (2025) 16:131 Page 10 of 16
pudendal nerve involvement is often more isolated. This
may be associated with a peritoneal diverticulum, similar
to sciatic nerve involvement (Fig. 8)[ 55]. It is essential to
describe the lesion ’s relationship to the pudendal vascular
pedicle, the sciatic nerve, and the obturator internus
muscle sling posterior to the ischial spine.
At the level of the perineal region, pudendal nerve
involvement may result from endometriosis of an
Fig. 7 DE in a 29-year-old woman with deep dyspareunia and left pudendalgia. A–C Axial and ( D) sagittal T2W MR images show fibrotic nodular
infiltration of the left posterolateral parametrium (stars) extending to the pelvic wall and to the iliococcygeus muscle of the levator ani muscle ( D, black
arrows), involving the left inferior hypogastric plexus, the left sacral nerves courses S3 and S4, and the level of origin of the left proximal pudenda l nerve
(C, circle). The patient was treated medically with hormone therapy
Fig. 8 DE in a 43-year-old woman with dyspareunia and perineal pain. A Axial and ( B) coronal T2W MR images show an endometriotic lesion (circle) of
the right distal mediolateral parametrium extending to the pelvic wall in contact with the pudendal vascular-nerve bundle at the level of arcus tendi neus
of the levator ani muscle ( B, arrowhead). The right ureter passes quite widely inside this lesion ( A, arrow). This lesion is located in front of the right ischial
spine mark ( A, dashed arrow) and the sciatic nerve. This lesion is isolated without involvement of the ovarian fossa or the posterolateral parametrium.
C Axial fat-suppressed T1W MR image showing diffuse T1-hyperintense endometriotic hemorrhagic microcysts (arrows). The patient was treated
medically with hormone therapy
Bourg et al . Insights into Imaging (2025) 16:131 Page 11 of 16
episiotomy scar extending into the ischiorectal fossa
(Fig. 9)[ 56]. MRI can assess DE pattern in this region and
evaluate the lesion ’s relationship to the levator ani muscle,
obturator internus muscle, vagina and anal canal. How-
ever, episiotomy scar endometriosis remains rare and
MRI is also crucial to exclude differential diagnoses such
as granuloma, chronic in flammation, or anal fistula.
Pain management in patients with pudendal neuropathy
includes medical treatment with drugs (antidepressants or
neuromodulators) and perineural injection of corticos-
teroids and lidocaine or bupivacaine [ 55]. In most cases,
these injections offer temporary symptom relief. Pudendal
nerve decompression surgery may be considered for
patients who do not respond to medical treatment.
Fig. 9 DE in a 34-year-old woman with pudendalgia after vaginal delivery with forceps extraction and bilateral mediolateral episiotomy. A Axial and
(B) coronal T2W MR images show a bilateral fibrotic in filtration (arrows) of the levator ani muscle at the level of the distal course of bilateral pudendal
nerves, as well as in filtration of the left part of the vagina (A, arrowhead). C Axial fat-suppressed T1W MR image reveals some T1-hyperintense
endometriotic hemorrhagic microcysts (arrows). D Axial T1W post-contrast MR image shows a better delineation of the left vaginal (sub) mucosal
involvement (arrow). E Axial T2W and ( F) axial fat-suppressed T1W post-contrast MR images show a right vulvar lesion (arrows) correlating with clinical
photographs ( G). The patient was treated medically with hormone therapy
Bourg et al . Insights into Imaging (2025) 16:131 Page 12 of 16
Treatment of episiotomy scar endometriosis may
require surgical excision to minimize the risk of recur-
rence. Recently, image-guided percutaneous treatments
using cryotherapy have been considered [ 57].
Lumbar plexus
The lumbar plexus is formed by the ventral rami of the
L1–L4 nerve roots. It descends within or posterior to the
psoas major muscle, anterior to the L2 –L5 transverse
processes, before exiting into the pelvis [ 45]. Key nerves
arising from this plexus include the obturator nerve and
the femoral.
Obturator nerve
The obturator nerve is formed by the ventral rami of
L2–L4. It arises from the medial border of the psoas major
muscle and descends along the pelvic brim. It joins the
obturator vessels and passes through the superolateral
aspect of the obturator foramen within the obturator
canal [ 45]. The obturator nerve provides motor innerva-
tion to the adductor muscles of the hip and sensory
innervation to the medial thigh and knee.
Although relatively small, this nerve is of suf ficient
caliber to be visualized on MRI, particularly using 3D
T2W sequences. It is well depicted in its proximal course,
medial to the psoas major at L5, and then follows a des-
cending, anterior course to join the obturator vascular
pedicle, which is easily identi fied by its characteristic flow
void appearance (Supplemental Fig. 8).
Symptomatic obturator nerve endometriosis is rare and
manifests with inner thigh pain, thigh adduction weak-
ness, or dif ficulty in walking [ 58].
Endometriotic involvement of the obturator nerve is
rare, it is commonly described in the obturator fossa
[59–62]. It often results from the extension of a large
endometriotic lesion from the ovarian fossa going through
the mediolateral parametrium up to the obturator nerve
(Fig. 10). MRI features include a retractile fibrotic in fil-
tration with possible hemorrhagic cystic areas along
the pelvic wall, tracking the course of the nerve. The
MRI report should specify the relationship of the
endometriosis lesion to the ureter and the obturator
internus muscle. In chronic cases, nerve involvement may
References
1. Buck Louis GM, Hediger ML, Peterson CM et al (2011) Incidence of endo-
metriosis by study population and diagnostic method: the ENDO study.
Fertil Steril 96:360–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.087
2. Bourgioti C, Preza O, Panourgias E et al (2017) MR imaging of endome-
triosis: spectrum of disease. Diagn Interv Imaging 98:751 –767. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.diii.2017.05.009
3. Tomassetti C, Johnson NP, Petrozza J et al (2021) An international ter-
minology for endometriosis, 2021. J Minim Invasive Gynecol
28:1849–1859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2021.08.032
4. Siquara De Sousa AC, Capek S, Amrami KK, Spinner RJ (2015) Neural
involvement in endometriosis: review of anatomic distribution and
mechanisms: neural involvement in endometriosis: review. Clin Anat
28:1029–1038. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22617
5. Possover M, Chiantera V (2007) Isolated in filtrative endometriosis of the
sciatic nerve: a report of three patients. Fertil Steril 87:417.e17 –417.e19.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.084
6. Moura Filho JP, Leão RV, Horvat N et al (2020) What abdominal radiologists
should know about extragenital endometriosis-associated neuropathy.
Abdom Radiol (NY) 45:1818 –1828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-
1864-x
7. Bazot M, Lafont C, Rouzier R et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of physical
examination, transvaginal sonography, rectal endoscopic sonography,
and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose deep in filtrating endo-
metriosis. Fertil Steril 92:1825 –1833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.
2008.09.005
8. Lorusso F, Scioscia M, Rubini D et al (2021) Magnetic resonance imaging
for deep in filtrating endometriosis: current concepts, imaging technique
and key findings. Insights Imaging 12:105. https://doi.org/10.1186/
s13244-021-01054-x
9. Kale A, Baydili KNS, Keles E et al (2022) Comparison of isolated sciatic
nerve and sacral nerve root endometriosis: a review of the literature. J
Minim Invasive Gynecol 29:943 –951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2022.
05.017
10. Anaf V (2000) Relationship between endometriotic foci and nerves in
rectovaginal endometriotic nodules. Hum Reprod 15:1744 –1750. https://
doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.8.1744
11. Parasar P, Ozcan P, Terry KL (2017) Endometriosis: epidemiology, diag-
nosis and clinical management. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep 6:34 –41. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s13669-017-0187-1
12. Roman H, Dehan L, Merlot B et al (2021) Postoperative outcomes after
surgery for deep endometriosis of the sacral plexus and sciatic nerve: a
52-patient consecutive series. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 28:1375 –1383.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.10.018
13. Yan D, Liu X, Guo S-W (2017) Nerve fibers and endometriotic lesions:
partners in crime in in flicting pains in women with endometriosis. Eur J
Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 209:14 –24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.
2016.06.017
14. Asante A, Taylor RN (2011) Endometriosis: the role of neuroangiogenesis. Annu
Rev Physiol 73:163–182.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142158
15. Bricou A, Batt RE, Chapron C (2008) Peritoneal fluid flow in fluences
anatomical distribution of endometriotic lesions: Why Sampson seems to
be right. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 138:127 –134. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.01.014
16. Sampson J (1927) Peritoneal endometriosis due to the menstrual dis-
semination of endometrial tissue into the peritoneal cavity. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 14:442 –469
17. Carranco R, Zoomer M, Berg C (2021) Peritoneal retraction pocket defects
and their important relationship with pelvic pain and endometriosis. J
Minim Invasive Gynecol 28:168 –169. 0.1016/j.jmig.2020.05.020
18. Vercellini P (2003) Evidence for asymmetric distribution of sciatic nerve
endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol 102:383 –387. https://doi.org/10.1016/
S0029-7844(03)00532-5
19. Possover M, Rhiem K, Chiantera V (2005) The “neurologic hypothesis ”:A
new concept in the pathogenesis of the endometriosis? Gynecol Surg
2:107–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-004-0070-8
20. Siquara De Sousa AC, Capek S, Howe BM et al (2015) Magnetic resonance
imaging evidence for perineural spread of endometriosis to the lumbo-
sacral plexus: report of 2 cases. Neurosurg Focus 39:E15. https://doi.org/
10.3171/2015.6.FOCUS15208
21. Possover M (2021) Laparoscopic morphological aspects and tentative
explanation of the aetiopathogenesis of isolated endometriosis of the
sciatic nerve: a review based on 267 patients. Facts Views Vis Obgyn
13:369–375. https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.13.4.047
22. Colak C, Chamie LP, Youngner J et al (2024) MRI features of pelvic nerve
involvement in endometriosis. Radiographics 44:e230106. https://doi.org/
10.1148/rg.230106
23. Niro J, Fournier M, Oberlin C et al (2014) Endometriotic lesions of the
lower troncular nerves. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 42:702 –705. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.gyobfe.2014.08.003
24. Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Alboni C et al (2010) Laparoscopic nerve-sparing
transperitoneal approach for endometriosis in filtrating the pelvic wall and
somatic nerves: anatomical considerations and surgical technique. Surg
Radiol Anat 32:601 –604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0624-6
25. Possover M, Quakernack J, Chiantera V (2005) The LANN technique to reduce
postoperative functional morbidity in laparoscopic radical pelvic surgery. J Am
Coll Surg 201:913–917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.07.006
26. Aredo J, Heyrana K, Karp B et al (2017) Relating chronic pelvic pain and
endometriosis to signs of sensitization and myofascial pain and dys-
function. Semin Reprod Med 35:088 –097. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-
1597123
27. Bazot M, Bharwani N, Huchon C et al (2017) European society of uro-
genital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis.
Eur Radiol 27:2765 –2775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4673-z
28. Tong A, VanBuren WM, Chamié L et al (2020) Recommendations for MRI
technique in the evaluation of pelvic endometriosis: consensus state-
ment from the Society of Abdominal Radiology endometriosis disease-
focused panel. Abdom Radiol (NY) 45:1569 –1586. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00261-020-02483-w
Bourg et al . Insights into Imaging (2025) 16:131 Page 15 of 16
29. Delaney H, Bencardino J, Rosenberg ZS (2014) Magnetic resonance
neurography of the pelvis and lumbosacral plexus. Neuroimaging Clin N
Am 24:127 –150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.026
30. Thomassin-Naggara I, Zoua CS, Bazot M et al (2024) Diagnostic MRI for
deep pelvic endometriosis: Towards a standardized protocol? Eur Radiol.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10842-0
31. Zhang X, Li M, Guan J et al (2017) Evaluation of the sacral nerve plexus in
pelvic endometriosis by three ‐dimensional MR neurography. J Magn
Reson Imaging 45:1225 –1231. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25435
32. Chen W-C, Tsai Y-H, Weng H-H et al (2014) Value of enhancement
technique in 3D-T2-STIR images of the brachial plexus. J Comput Assist
Tomogr 38:335 –339. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000061
33. Filler AG, Maravilla KR, Tsuruda JS (2024) MR neurography and muscle MR
imaging for image diagnosis of disorders affecting the peripheral nerves
and musculature. Neurol Clin 22:643 –682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.
2004.03.005
34. Mori S, Zhang J (2006) Principles of diffusion tensor imaging and its
applications to basic neuroscience research. Neuron 51:527 –539. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.08.012
35. Porpora MG, Vinci V, De Vito C et al (2018) The role of magnetic reso-
nance imaging –diffusion tensor imaging in predicting pain related to
endometriosis: a preliminary study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25:661 –669.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.033
36. Manganaro L, Porpora MG, Vinci V et al (2014) Diffusion tensor imaging
and tractography to evaluate sacral nerve root abnormalities in
endometriosis-related pain: a pilot study. Eur Radiol 24:95 –101. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2981-0
37. Alkatout I, Wedel T, Pape J et al (2021) Review: pelvic nerves — from
anatomy and physiology to clinical applications. Transl Neurosci
12:362–378. https://doi.org/10.1515/tnsci-2020-0184
38. Rousset P, Florin M, Bharwani N et al (2023) Deep pelvic in filtrating
endometriosis: MRI consensus lexicon and compartment-based approach
from the ENDOVALIRM group. Diagn Interv Imaging 104:95 –112. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2022.09.004
39. Astruc A, Roux L, Robin F et al (2024) Advanced insights into human
uterine innervation: implications for endometriosis and pelvic pain. J Clin
Med 13:1433. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13051433
40. Scattarelli A (2020) Anatomic reports of vegetative nerves within para
rectal fossa, to the rectal endometriosis surgery application. Gynecol
Obstet Fertil Senol 48:649 –656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2020.04.002
41. Pontes Fernandez CFR, Oliveira BC, Franco IP et al (2024) Imaging anat-
omy of the lateral pelvic compartment applied to endometriosis. Abdom
Radiol (NY) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04541-z
42. Chamié LP, Ribeiro DMFR, Tiferes DA et al (2018) Atypical sites of deeply
infiltrative endometriosis: clinical characteristics and imaging findings.
Radiographics 38:309 –328. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2018170093
43. Rousset P, Buisson G, Lega J-C et al (2021) Rectal endometriosis: pre-
dictive MRI signs for segmental bowel resection. Eur Radiol 31:884 –894.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07170-4
44. Possover M (2014) Pathophysiologic explanation for bladder retention in
patients after laparoscopic surgery for deeply in filtrating rectovaginal
and/or parametric endometriosis. Fertil Steril 101:754 –758. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.019
45. Neufeld EA, Shen PY, Nidecker AE et al (2015) MR imaging of the lum-
bosacral plexus: a review of techniques and pathologies: MR imaging of
the lumbosacral plexus. J Neuroimaging 25:691 –703. https://doi.org/10.
1111/jon.12253
46. Russell JM, Kransdorf MJ, Bancroft LW et al (2008) Magnetic resonance
imaging of the sacral plexus and piriformis muscles. Skeletal Radiol
37:709–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-008-0486-8
47. Possover M, Schneider T, Henle K-P (2011) Laparoscopic therapy for
endometriosis and vascular entrapment of sacral plexus. Fertil Steril
95:756–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.08.048
48. Papapietro N, Gulino G, Zobel BBB et al (2002) Cyclic sciatica related to an
extrapelvic endometriosis of the sciatic nerve: new concepts in surgical
therapy. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:436 –439. https://doi.org/10.1097/
00024720-200210000-00016
49. Head HB, Welch JS, Mussey E, Espinosa RE (1962) Cyclic sciatica: report of
case with introduction of a new surgical sign. JAMA J Am Med Assoc
180:521–524. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1962.03050200005002
50. Pham M, Sommer C, Wessig C et al (2010) Magnetic resonance neuro-
graphy for the diagnosis of extrapelvic sciatic endometriosis. Fertil Steril
94:351.e11–351.e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.046
51. Possover M (2017) Five-year follow-up after laparoscopic large nerve
resection for deep in filtrating sciatic nerve endometriosis. J Minim Inva-
sive Gynecol 24:822 –826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.02.027
52. Yanchun L, Yunhe Z, Meng X et al (2019) Removal of an endometrioma
passing through the left greater sciatic foramen using a concomitant
laparoscopic and transgluteal approach: case report. BMC Womens
Health 19:95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0796-0
53. Roman H, Seyer-Hansen M, Dennis T, Merlot B (2021) Excision of deep
endometriosis nodules of the sciatic nerve in 10 steps. J Minim Invasive
Gynecol 28:1685 –1686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2021.05.019
54. Chhabra A, McKenna CA, Wadhwa V et al (2016) 3T magnetic resonance
neurography of pudendal nerve with cadaveric dissection correlation.
World J Radiol 8:700. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i7.700
55. Maestre-Verdú S, Medrano-Martínez V, Pack C et al (2017) Alcock canal
syndrome secondary to endometrial in filtration. Neurologia 32:264 –266.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrl.2015.05.005
56. Bindra V, Reddy N, Reddy CA et al (2022) Recurrent perineal scar endo-
metriosis: a case report. Case Rep Womens Health 36:e00457. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.crwh.2022.e00457
57. Najdawi M, Ben Ammar M, Nouri-Neuville M et al (2020) Cryoablation
percutanée de l ’ endométriose en radiologie interventionnelle. Imag
Femme 30:80 –84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femme.2020.06.006
58. Kale A, Aboalhasan Y, Gündo ğdu EC et al (2022) Obturator nerve endo-
metriosis: a systematic review of the literature. Facts Views Vis Obgyn
14:219–223. https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.14.3.032
59. Waer P, Samson I, Sinnaeve F et al (2012) Perineural spread of endometriosis
along the obturator nerve into the adductor thigh compartment. Jpn J
Radiol 30:446–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-012-0060-0
60. Osório F, Alves J, Pereira J et al (2018) Obturator internus muscle endo-
metriosis with nerve involvement: a rare clinical presentation. J Minim
Invasive Gynecol 25:330 –333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.013
61. Fambrini M, Andersson KL, Campanacci DA et al (2010) Large-muscle endo-
metriosis involving the adductor tig ht compartment: case report. J Minim
Invasive Gynecol 17:258–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2009.12.004
62. Ekpo G, Senapati S, Advincula AP (2007) Laparoscopic excision of endo-
metriosis of the obturator nerve: a case report. J Minim Invasive Gynecol
14:764–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2007.06.005
63. Teisala K, Punnonen R, Hietanen P (1986) Compression of the femoral
nerve due to endometriosis of the inguinal region. J Obstet Gynaecol
7:70–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.1986.11978622
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional af filiations.
Bourg et al . Insights into Imaging (2025) 16:131 Page 16 of 16