Etiology distribution of abnormal uterine bleeding according to FIGO classification system: A combined study of ultrasound and histopathology

Pingjuan Ni, Mei Wu, Hui Guan, Yuqi Yuan, Lulu Zhang, Feixue Zhang, Xiuliang Wei, Ya Li
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research · 2022 · vol. 48(7) , pp. 1913–1920 · doi:10.1111/jog.15226 · PMID:35777974 · W4224056433
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 3 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This study classified abnormal uterine bleeding causes using the FIGO PALM-COEIN system, finding leiomyoma (AUB-L) to be the most prevalent etiology, followed by ovulatory disorders (AUB-O).

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

AIM: To classify the FIGO's PALM-COEIN etiology for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) patients according to the ultrasound and histopathology and to evaluate the etiology prevalence distribution for AUB patients. METHODS: A total of 1065 women with AUB in the Second Hospital of Shandong University between January 2019 and March 2021. The intrauterine histopathological and ultrasound results were reviewed retrospectively.PALM-COEIN etiology classification was performed according to histopathology and ultrasound. The classification system was stratified into nine basic categories: Polyp (AUB-P), adenomyosis (AUB-A), leiomyoma (AUB-L), malignancy and hyperplasia (AUB-M), coagulopathy (AUB-C), ovulatory disorders (AUB-O), endometrium (AUB-E), Iatrogenic(AUB-I), and not classified (AUB-N). The number of cases and composition ratio were also calculated. RESULTS: According to the FIGO's classification system, the PALM group (656,61.60%), which were defined as structural entities that can be measured visually with ultrasound and/or histopathology. 176 (16.53%) patients were classified as AUB-P,102 (9.58%) patients were classified as AUB-A, 487(45.73%) patients were classified as AUB-L, 31 (2.91%) patients were classified as AUB-M. The COEIN group (409,38.40%), which were defined as nonstructural entities that cannot be measured by ultrasound and/or histopathology. Nobody were classified as AUB-C in our group, and 383 (35.96%) patients were classified as AUB-O, 4 (0.38%) patients were classified as AUB-E,14 (1.31%) patients were classified as AUB-I,8 (0.75%) patients were classified as AUB-N. CONCLUSION: In our study, AUB-L was the most common cause, followed by AUB-O, AUB-P, AUB-A, AUB-M, AUB-I, AUB-N, and AUB-E.PALM-COEIN etiology classification system played an important role in the epidemic and management standardization of AUB patients, provided an effective communication between physicians and researchers also. Ultrasonography was the preferred examination for AUB patients, especially with structural abnormalities.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (25)

Cited by (3)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:37.928166+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK