Efficacy of dienogest in the treatment of endometrioma-related pain and subfertility

article OA: closed CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

Eighteen months of dienogest significantly reduced endometrioma volume, pain, and improved sexual function and ovarian reserve markers, with a notable pregnancy rate in infertile patients.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

AIM: This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of Dienogest in the treatment of endometrioma and related symptoms. METHODS: This study included 209 patients who were diagnosed with endometrioma in our clinic between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2021. The patients were diagnosed with ultrasonography by using the ultrasonographic diagnostic criteria of endometrioma. These diagnostic criteria were supported by clinical findings. Demographic characteristics, medical history, ultrasonographic examination of endometrioma, and the pre-treatment visual analog scale (VAS) assessment score of all patients were recorded in the study. The female sexual function index (FSFI) was used to assess sexual function before and during treatment, and the results were recorded. Patients received dienogest (2 mg/day) for 18 months. Ultrasonography was performed from the beginning of treatment until the 18th month every 3 months, blood values were monitored, and VAS scores were recorded. A total of 182 patients out of 209 patients completed the 18-month treatment. Four different statistical analyses were used to evaluate the data of the patients who completed the treatment, and these analyses were performed with SPSS 22.00 statistical package program. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients completed the 18-month study. Endometrioma volume was statistically significantly (84.3%) reduced during the treatment period (P < 0.001). Similarly, the pain of the patients also decreased significantly (P < 0.001). In addition, CA-125 values were decreased in parallel with the endometrioma volume. All VAS scores and FSFI scores were significantly improved during the treatment period. Antral follicle count and anti-Müllerian hormone value, which are markers of ovarian reserve, were significantly increased. During the 6-month follow-up period after the completion of treatment, eight (44.4%) of 18 patients with infertility before treatment became spontaneously pregnant. Hgb, WBC, plt, FSH, LH, E2, liver function tests, and lipid profiles did not change. CONCLUSION: Eighteen months of dienogest treatment was highly effective, safe, and tolerable in reducing endometrioma-related pelvic pain, improving sexual dysfunction due to endometrioma, volume of endometrioma, and markers of ovarian reserve. In conclusion, dienogest can be used in infertile patients before surgery or oocyte retrieval to reduce the risk of abscesses and infections. Long-term dienogest treatment in young women with no desire for pregnancy in the short term might reduce the likelihood of surgery later in life and the risk of loss of ovarian reserve due to repeated surgery, while increasing the likelihood of fertilization.
Full text 2,993 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Aim This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of Dienogest in the treatment of endometrioma and related symptoms.

Methods

This study included 209 patients who were diagnosed with endometrioma in our clinic between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2021. The patients were diagnosed with ultrasonography by using the ultrasonographic diagnostic criteria of endometrioma. These diagnostic criteria were supported by clinical findings. Demographic characteristics, medical history, ultrasonographic examination of endometrioma, and the pre-treatment visual analog scale (VAS) assessment score of all patients were recorded in the study. The female sexual function index (FSFI) was used to assess sexual function before and during treatment, and the results were recorded. Patients received dienogest (2 mg/day) for 18 months. Ultrasonography was performed from the beginning of treatment until the 18th month every 3 months, blood values were monitored, and VAS scores were recorded. A total of 182 patients out of 209 patients completed the 18-month treatment. Four different statistical analyses were used to evaluate the data of the patients who completed the treatment, and these analyses were performed with SPSS 22.00 statistical package program.

Results

A total of 182 patients completed the 18-month study. Endometrioma volume was statistically significantly (84.3%) reduced during the treatment period (P < 0.001). Similarly, the pain of the patients also decreased significantly (P < 0.001). In addition, CA-125 values were decreased in parallel with the endometrioma volume. All VAS scores and FSFI scores were significantly improved during the treatment period. Antral follicle count and anti-Müllerian hormone value, which are markers of ovarian reserve, were significantly increased. During the 6-month follow-up period after the completion of treatment, eight (44.4%) of 18 patients with infertility before treatment became spontaneously pregnant. Hgb, WBC, plt, FSH, LH, E2, liver function tests, and lipid profiles did not change.

Conclusion

Eighteen months of dienogest treatment was highly effective, safe, and tolerable in reducing endometrioma-related pelvic pain, improving sexual dysfunction due to endometrioma, volume of endometrioma, and markers of ovarian reserve. In conclusion, dienogest can be used in infertile patients before surgery or oocyte retrieval to reduce the risk of abscesses and infections. Long-term dienogest treatment in young women with no desire for pregnancy in the short term might reduce the likelihood of surgery later in life and the risk of loss of ovarian reserve due to repeated surgery, while increasing the likelihood of fertilization. CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT The author declares no conflict of interest. DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Outcome instruments

VAS-pain

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_painendometriomainfertility

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (16)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-28T06:14:09.330459+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-07-28T06:09:53.445028+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK