Excisional versus ablative surgery for peritoneal endometriosis

T. Bignardi, Tommaso Bignardi, Su-Yen Khong, Su‐Yen Khong, Alan Lam
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2011 · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008979 · W1604597985
Other OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This Cochrane Review protocol outlines a planned comparison of surgical excision versus ablation for peritoneal endometriosis to assess outcomes including pain, fertility, recurrence, and safety.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To determine whether surgical excision or ablation is the optimum management of peritoneal endometriosis with respect to pain and secondary outcomes on fertility, recurrence and safety or harm issues.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (74)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

crossref
last seen: 2026-05-15T01:00:29.951480+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-17T06:24:38.187582+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK