Peritoneal surgery in the treatment of endometriosis--excision or thermal ablation?

other OA: closed public-domain-us ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

Twenty patients with Stage 2 to 4 endometriosis were referred to an Endometriosis Clinic with an average of 3.4 previous medical and surgical treatments. All were treated by peritoneal excision. Follow-up was for 9-36 months and 14 had a further laparoscopy. Seventeen of 20 patients are free of symptoms. In 1 patient recurrence occurred in a separate site and in 2 there were lesions close to the original lesion in the pouch of Douglas and bladder wall. In addition, 1 of the 14 patients having further laparoscopy had mild adhesions. The satisfactory results of the study suggest that a controlled trial comparing peritoneal excision and thermal ablation is worthwhile. There are considerable theoretical advantages in using peritoneal excision rather than peritoneal thermal ablation.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Catheter Ablation Endometriosis Peritoneum Adult Douglas' Pouch Douglas' Pouch Endometriosis Female Humans Peritoneum Treatment Outcome

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (1)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:02.671803+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine