[Guidelines for Clinical Practice of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2021: Prophylactic procedures associated with gynecologic surgery]

C. Touboul, Touboul C, Legendre G, Guillaume Legendre, G Legendre, Agostini A, A. Agostini, Chérif Akladios, C Akladios, Bendifallah S, S. Bendifallah, Pierre‐Adrien Bolze, Bolze PA, P A Bolze, Bouet PE, Pierre‐Emmanuel Bouet, P E Bouet, Chauvet P, Pauline Chauvet, P. Chauvet, P Collinet, Collinet P, Pierre Collinet, Y. Dabi, Dabi Y, J. Delotte, Delotte J, Deffieux X, X. Deffieux, Ludivine Dion, L Dion, T Gauthier, Gauthier T, Y Kerbage, Yohan Kerbage, Kerbage Y, Martin Koskas, M Koskas, Millet P, P. Millet, F Narducci, Filomena Narducci, Narducci F, Ouldamer L, L. Ouldamer, Ploteau S, S Ploteau, Stéphane Ploteau, P Santulli, Santulli P, Pietro Santulli, Golfier F, F. Golfier, Fabrice Golfier
Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie · 2021 · vol. 49(11) , pp. 805–815 · doi:10.1016/j.gofs.2021.09.007 · PMID:34520857 · W3201330107
Guideline OA: closed CC0
🔓 Open OA copy Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-09 ⓘ

A consensus panel developed 34 recommendations on seven prophylactic gynecologic procedures during surgery for other indications, with six based on high-quality evidence.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-20 · read from full text ⓘ

The provided text does not contain the abstract or body of a research paper but rather a security challenge page generated by an anti-bot system called Anubis. This page explains that a Proof-of-Work scheme is being used to prevent automated scraping by AI companies, requiring modern JavaScript features to proceed. Consequently, there is no scientific data, methodology, or clinical findings available to summarize from this input. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To draw up recommendations on the use of prophylactic gynecologic procedures during surgery for other indications. DESIGN: A consensus panel of 19 experts was convened. A formal conflict of interest policy was established at the onset of the process and applied throughout. The entire study was performed independently without funding from pharmaceutical companies or medical device manufacturers. The panel applied the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system to evaluate the quality of evidence on which the recommendations were based. The authors were advised against making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence. Some recommendations were ungraded. METHODS: The panel studied 22 key questions on seven prophylactic procedures: 1) salpingectomy, 2) fimbriectomy, 3) salpingo-oophorectomy, 4) ablation of peritoneal endometriosis, 5) adhesiolysis, 6) endometrial excision or ablation, and 7) cervical ablation. RESULTS: The literature search and application of the GRADE system resulted in 34 recommendations. Six were supported by high-quality evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 28 by low-quality evidence (GRADE 2+/-). Recommendations on two questions were left ungraded due to a lack of evidence in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: A high level of consensus was achieved among the experts regarding the use of prophylactic gynecologic procedures. The ensuing recommendations should result in improved current practice.
Full text 1,068 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Making sure you're not a bot! Loading... You are seeing this because the administrator of this website has set up Anubis to protect the server against the scourge of AI companies aggressively scraping websites. This can and does cause downtime for the websites, which makes their resources inaccessible for everyone. Anubis is a compromise. Anubis uses a Proof-of-Work scheme in the vein of Hashcash, a proposed proof-of-work scheme for reducing email spam. The idea is that at individual scales the additional load is ignorable, but at mass scraper levels it adds up and makes scraping much more expensive. Ultimately, this is a placeholder solution so that more time can be spent on fingerprinting and identifying headless browsers (EG: via how they do font rendering) so that the challenge proof of work page doesn't need to be presented to users that are much more likely to be legitimate. Please note that Anubis requires the use of modern JavaScript features that plugins like JShelter will disable. Please disable JShelter or other such plugins for this domain.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

MeSH descriptors

Anesthesia Anesthesia Gynecology Gynecology Female Female Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Humans Humans Salpingectomy Salpingectomy Salpingo-oophorectomy Salpingo-oophorectomy

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (95)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-13T06:10:10.580696+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T06:00:05.006021+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:32:22.069507+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-12T07:21:10.926195+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK