Recommandations pour Pratique Clinique du Collège des Gynécologues Obstétriciens français 2021 : gestes prophylactiques associés en chirurgie gynécologique

C. Touboul, Touboul C, Legendre G, Guillaume Legendre, G Legendre, Agostini A, A. Agostini, Chérif Akladios, C Akladios, Bendifallah S, S. Bendifallah, Pierre‐Adrien Bolze, Bolze PA, P A Bolze, Bouet PE, Pierre‐Emmanuel Bouet, P E Bouet, Chauvet P, Pauline Chauvet, P. Chauvet, P Collinet, Collinet P, Pierre Collinet, Y. Dabi, Dabi Y, J. Delotte, Delotte J, Deffieux X, X. Deffieux, Ludivine Dion, L Dion, T Gauthier, Gauthier T, Y Kerbage, Yohan Kerbage, Kerbage Y, Martin Koskas, M Koskas, Millet P, P. Millet, F Narducci, Filomena Narducci, Narducci F, Ouldamer L, L. Ouldamer, Ploteau S, S Ploteau, Stéphane Ploteau, P Santulli, Santulli P, Pietro Santulli, Golfier F, F. Golfier, Fabrice Golfier
Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie · 2021 · vol. 49(11) , pp. 805–815 · doi:10.1016/j.gofs.2021.09.007 · PMID:34520857 · W3201330107
article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-09 ⓘ

A consensus panel developed 34 recommendations on seven prophylactic gynecologic procedures during surgery for other indications, with six based on high-quality evidence.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveTo draw up recommendations on the use of prophylactic gynecologic procedures during surgery for other indications.DesignA consensus panel of 19 experts was convened. A formal conflict of interest policy was established at the onset of the process and applied throughout. The entire study was performed independently without funding from pharmaceutical companies or medical device manufacturers. The panel applied the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system to evaluate the quality of evidence on which the recommendations were based. The authors were advised against making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence. Some recommendations were ungraded.MethodsThe panel studied 22 key questions on seven prophylactic procedures: 1) salpingectomy, 2) fimbriectomy, 3) salpingo-oophorectomy, 4) ablation of peritoneal endometriosis, 5) adhesiolysis, 6) endometrial excision or ablation, and 7) cervical ablation.ResultsThe literature search and application of the GRADE system resulted in 34 recommendations. Six were supported by high-quality evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 28 by low-quality evidence (GRADE 2+/-). Recommendations on two questions were left ungraded due to a lack of evidence in the literature.ConclusionsA high level of consensus was achieved among the experts regarding the use of prophylactic gynecologic procedures. The ensuing recommendations should result in improved current practice.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Anesthesia Gynecology Female Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Humans Salpingectomy Salpingo-oophorectomy

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (95)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-26T06:08:41.316361+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T06:00:05.006021+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:24:20.309598+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-26T06:23:03.089193+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK