Balancing ovarian preservation and recurrence risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cystectomy versus ablative methods in endometrioma management

Paola Romeo, P Romeo, A. Tassone, Tassone A, Bonanno L, L. Bonanno, Vizzielli G, G. Vizzielli, S. Restaino, Restaino S, C. Ronsini, Ronsini C, V Chiantera, Chiantera V, R. Granese, Granese R, S. Cianci, Cianci S
European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2026 · vol. 325 , pp. 115288 · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2026.115288 · PMID:42424709 · W7167517914
Systematic review / meta-analysis OA: hybrid CC0
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-08 ⓘ

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared cystectomy to ablative methods for endometrioma management, examining outcomes related to ovarian preservation and recurrence risk.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare cystectomy and ablative surgical techniques for the treatment of ovarian endometrioma, focusing on recurrence, ovarian reserve, and fertility outcomes. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines and prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261342497). PubMed and Scopus were searched from January 2000 to September 2025. Studies comparing cystectomy with ablative techniques (CO2 laser, argon plasma coagulation, PlasmaJet, bipolar energy, or hybrid approaches) in women with ovarian endometrioma ≥3 cm were included. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included, with 4-6 studies contributing to each meta-analysis depending on outcome availability. Cystectomy showed a trend toward lower recurrence compared with ablative techniques (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-1.01; p = 0.054), although this did not reach statistical significance. Ablative techniques were associated with better preservation of ovarian reserve, with a significantly smaller decline in antral follicle count (MD - 1.96, 95% CI - 3.04 to - 0.88; p < 0.001), while no significant difference was observed in anti-Müllerian hormone levels (MD - 0.24, 95% CI - 0.69 to 0.21; p = 0.30). No significant differences were found in overall pregnancy (RR 1.02), spontaneous conception (RR 1.02), or ART/IVF pregnancy rates (RR 0.83). CONCLUSION: Cystectomy may reduce recurrence risk, whereas ablative techniques better preserve ovarian reserve. However, neither approach appears to confer a significant advantage in fertility outcomes. Surgical management of ovarian endometrioma should be individualized based on patient characteristics and reproductive goals.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Ablation Techniques Ablation Techniques Ablation Techniques Ablation Techniques Ablation Techniques Ablation Techniques Ablation Techniques Ablation Techniques Ablation Techniques Ablation Techniques Ablation Techniques Ablation Techniques Ablation Techniques Ablation Techniques Ablation Techniques Ablation Techniques Ablation Techniques Ablation Techniques Ablation Techniques Ablation Techniques

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (35)

SciLite annotations

chemicals 1
argon

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-11T09:27:45.537177+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-10-05T06:10:06.749997+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-15T06:02:37.990986+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-07-19T09:54:07.271699+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-09T06:31:01.691765+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK