Prolonged use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and tibolone as add-back therapy for the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia

In: Maturitas · 2003 · vol. 48(2) , pp. 125–132 · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2003.08.008 · PMID:15172086 · W2109640284
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 9 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This study investigated the efficacy and safety of using a GnRH agonist with tibolone as add-back therapy for treating endometrial hyperplasia.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectivesTo investigate the response of the various hyperplastic disorders of the endometrium to a prolonged treatment with leuprolide acetate, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a), plus tibolone, as add-back therapy, and further to study if the tibolone addition reduces the hypoestrogenic actions of the GnRH-analogue.MethodsWe treated 26 women with histologically confirmed simple (n = 9), complex (n = 15) or atypical (n = 2) endometrial hyperplasia (EH) for 12 months with monthly injections of 1Ampulle/3.75 mg of leuprolide acetate, followed by tibolone, 2.5mg per day per os. Every woman underwent a hysteroscopic evaluation and biopsy of the endometrium after 3 (in cases with atypical EH), 6 and 12 months of treatment, as well as after 12 and 24 months of follow-up. The clinical, paraclinical and laboratory course of the disease was followed-up by using of a climacteric scoring system and by testing of various parameters.ResultsThe histopathologic evaluation of the endometria revealed regression of EH in all women after 12 months of treatment, however, during the first 2 years of follow-up EH reappeared in four women (4/21, 19%). Bone mineral density and serum parameters did not show significant changes during treatment, whereas only a mild suffering from hypoestrogenic side-effects was noted.ConclusionsIt seems that the combined GnRH-a/tibolone treatment in women with EH is a potent alternative, so far as the endometrial status and the clinical course of the disease are concerned, whereas tibolone appears to act sufficiently as add-back therapy to prolonged GnRH-a treatment. The probability of relapse of the disease during the follow-up period makes the close monitoring of the endometrium after cessation of the treatment absolutely necessary.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (27)

Cited by (9)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-14T06:09:40.812857+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK