Effective Treatment of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding With Estradiol Valerate and Dienogest

Jeffrey T. Jensen, Susanne Parke, Uwe Mellinger, A. Machlitt, Ian S. Fraser
In: Obstetrics & Gynecology · 2011 · vol. 117(4) , pp. 777–787 · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3182118ac3 · PMID:21422847 · W2021760239
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 35 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

Estradiol valerate and dienogest significantly improved heavy menstrual bleeding symptoms and reduced blood loss compared to placebo in women without organic pathology.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the efficacy of a fixed estrogen step-down and progestin step-up 28-day estradiol (E2) valerate and dienogest oral contraceptive regimen in women with heavy menstrual bleeding, prolonged menstrual bleeding, or heavy and prolonged menstrual bleeding without organic pathology. METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomized women aged 18 years or older with prolonged, frequent, or heavy menstrual bleeding, objectively confirmed during a 90-day run-in phase, to treatment with E2 valerate and dienogest or placebo (2:1) for 196 days. Data from the last 90 days of treatment and the run-in phase were compared. The primary variable was the "complete response" rate (complete resolution of qualifying abnormal menstrual symptoms, including a 50% or greater reduction in pretreatment menstrual blood loss volume in women with heavy menstrual bleeding). Secondary variables included objective changes in menstrual blood loss volume (alkaline hematin methodology) and iron metabolism parameters. Overall, 180 women were needed to provide 90% power. RESULTS: There were no marked differences in the characteristics of E2 valerate and dienogest (n=120) and placebo (n=70) recipients. The proportion of "complete responders" in the evaluable group was significantly higher in E2 valerate and dienogest (35/80; 43.8%) compared with placebo (2/48, 4.2%, P<.001) recipients. The mean [standard deviation] reduction in menstrual blood loss with E2 valerate and dienogest from the run-in phase to the efficacy phase was substantial (-353 mL [309 mL]; mean -64.2%; median -70.6%) and significantly greater than that in placebo recipients (-130 mL [338 mL]; mean -7.8%; median -18.7%; P<.001). Significant improvements in hemoglobin, hematocrit, and ferritin were seen with E2 valerate and dienogest, but not with placebo. CONCLUSION: Oral E2 valerate and dienogest was highly effective compared with placebo in the treatment of women with heavy menstrual bleeding, prolonged menstrual bleeding, or heavy and prolonged menstrual bleeding without organic pathology. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00293059. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (32)

Cited by (35)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-14T06:03:08.038466+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK