Surgical Treatment of Endometriosis: Excision Versus Ablation of Peritoneal Disease

Tommaso Falcone, Jeffrey R Wilson
Journal of minimally invasive gynecology · 2018 · vol. 26(1) , pp. 1–2 · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2018.10.008 · PMID:30321670 · W2897477577
letter OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 6 in-corpus citations
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This paper compares the surgical outcomes of endometriosis treatment, focusing on the effectiveness of excisional versus ablative techniques for removing peritoneal lesions.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_pain

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Peritoneal Diseases Female Humans Pelvic Pain Somatoform Disorders

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (12)

Cited by (6)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:22:48.782012+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:19:31.300640+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK