Endometriosis: Conservative surgery for severe endometriosis: should laparotomy be abandoned definitively?

review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 30 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This review of recent literature indicates insufficient evidence to definitively abandon laparotomy for severe endometriosis, particularly for complex lesions, despite advances in laparoscopy.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

According to current opinion, surgery at laparotomy for conservative treatment of endometriosis is obsolete. The debate on the indications, modalities and results of surgical treatment for the most severe forms has recently been rekindled. Although some expert endoscopists propose advanced techniques to deal with the most problematic pelvic lesions, various authors wonder if such interventions have been demonstrated as efficacious and safe enough to justify abandoning the standard reference treatment. We have reviewed the data, comments and proposals recently published on the topic. The available scientific evidence appears insufficient to recommend laparoscopy instead of surgery at laparotomy, even for the most severe forms of endometriosis. Intestinal, vesical, periureteral, retroperitoneal, and vaginal lesions and large endometriomas associated with extensive dense adhesions may still benefit from classical surgery at laparotomy. However, the lack of comparative studies prevents a correct comparison of the methods in terms of pregnancy rate, resolution of pain and incidence of recurrences.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

mesh:D004715mesh:D017699endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Laparotomy Endometriosis Female Humans Laparoscopy Pelvic Pain Pregnancy Recurrence

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

Cited by (30)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:13.665691+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK