Role of hysterolaparoscopy for the evaluation of primary infertility: An experience from a tertiary care hospital
article
OA: diamond
CC0
⤵ 3 in-corpus citations
Abstract
Background: Infertility is one of the most common problem for which couple seeks medical attention. The main objective of the study was to assess the role of diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of primary infertility patients.Methods: For this retrospective study, patient with the diagnosis of primary infertility were recruited. Patients admitted between the periods 2014 to 2016 were included. Pertinent data related to infertility were collected from the case records and entered in predesigned performa.Results: Patients with primary infertility 246 (82%) diagnosed to have pelvic pathology. The most common cause of infertility was ovarian 122 (36.63%), Uterine 66 (19.82%), tubal 84 (25.22%) and unexplained infertility in 103 (30.93%) women. Patients with PCOS 76 (22.82%) and endometriosis 46 (13.81%) treated with drilling and endometriotic cystectomy. In 32 (9.60%) of patients hysteroscopic cannulation was done. For distal tubal blockage fimbrioplasty was performed in 38 (11.41%) of women. Pelvic adhesions diagnosed in 26 (7.80%) women. patients diagnosed with uterine septum 42 (12.61%) required hysteroscopic septal resection. During the evaluation of infertility 70 (21%) of women diagnosed to have incidental pelvic pathology treated according to pathology.Conclusions: Hysterolaparoscopy is emerging as a valuable technique for complete assessment of female infertility and also helps in treatment according to the cause.
Full text
5,339 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Background
Infertility is one of the most common problem for which couple seeks medical attention. The main objective of the study was to assess the role of diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of primary infertility patients.
Methods
For this retrospective study, patient with the diagnosis of primary infertility were recruited. Patients admitted between the periods 2014 to 2016 were included. Pertinent data related to infertility were collected from the case records and entered in predesigned performa.
Results
Patients with primary infertility 246 (82%) diagnosed to have pelvic pathology. The most common cause of infertility was ovarian 122 (36.63%), Uterine 66 (19.82%), tubal 84 (25.22%) and unexplained infertility in 103 (30.93%) women. Patients with PCOS 76 (22.82%) and endometriosis 46 (13.81%) treated with drilling and endometriotic cystectomy. In 32 (9.60%) of patients hysteroscopic cannulation was done. For distal tubal blockage fimbrioplasty was performed in 38 (11.41%) of women. Pelvic adhesions diagnosed in 26 (7.80%) women. patients diagnosed with uterine septum 42 (12.61%) required hysteroscopic septal resection. During the evaluation of infertility 70 (21%) of women diagnosed to have incidental pelvic pathology treated according to pathology.
Conclusions
Hysterolaparoscopy is emerging as a valuable technique for complete assessment of female infertility and also helps in treatment according to the cause.
Metrics
References
Dyer SJ. International estimates on infertility prevalence and treatment seeking: potential need and demand for medical care. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(9):2379-80.
Maheshwari A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. Effect of female age on the diagnostic categories of infertility. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:538-542.
Wilkes S, Chinn DJ, Murdoch A, Rubin G. Epidemiology and management of infertility: a population-based study in UK primary care. Fam Pract. 2009;26:269-74.
Thonneau P, Marchand S, Tallec A, Ferial ML, Ducot B, Lansac J et al. Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1,850,000) of three French regions (1988–1989). Hum Reprod. 1991;6:811-6.
Maroulis GB. Effect of aging on fertility and pregnancy, Seminars. Reprod Endocrinol. 1991;9:165.
Schwartz D, Mayaux MJ. Female fecundity as a function of age: results of artificial insemination in 2193 nulliparous women with azoospermic husbands. Federation CECOS. New Engl J Med. 1982;306:404.
Boricha YG, Sharma RK, Boricha BG, Mhapankar S, Chaterjee A, Narshetty J. Laparoscopy in 50 infertile couples: prospective study. Int J Med Clin Res.2011;2: 63-66.
Haider G, Rani S, Talpur S, Zehra N, Munir A. Laparoscopic evaluation of female infertility. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2010;22(1):136-38.
Shamim S, Farooq M, Shamim R. Diagnostic Laparoscopic Findings in Infertile Patients in the Saudi Population. Pakistan J Med Health Sci. 2010;4(4):560-3.
Jain G, Khatuja R, Juneja A, Mehta S. Laparoscopy:As a First Line Diagnostic Tool for Infertility Evaluation. J Clin Diag Res. 2014;8(10): 01-02.
Hessaloniki ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Consensus on infertility treatment related to poly-cystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:505-22.
Amer SA, Banu Z, Li TC, Cooke ID. Long-term follow-up of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome after laparoscopic ovarian drilling: endocrine and ultrasonographic outcomes. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2851-7.
Haney AF. Endometriosis: pathogenesis and pathophysiology. In: Wilson EA, ed. Endometriosis. New York: AR Liss,1987;23:51-6.
Koninckx PR, Meuleman C, Demeyere S, Lesaffre E, Cornillie FJ. Suggestive evidence that pelvic endometriosis is a progressive disease, whereas deeply infiltrating endometriosis is associated with pelvic pain. Fertil Steril. 1991;55:759-65.
Bonneaua C, Chanellesa O, Siferb C, Ponceleta C. Use of laparoscopy in unexplained infertility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;163(1):57-61.
Goel G, Khatuja R, Radhakrishnan G, Agarwal R, Agarwal S, Kaur I. Role of newer methods of diagnosing genital tuberculosis in infertile women. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2013;56:155-7.
Kodaman PH, Arici A, Seli E. Evidence-based diagnosis and management of tubal factor infertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2004;16:221-9.
Schippert C, Bassler C, Soergel P, Hille U, Hollwitz B, Garcia-Rocha GJ. Reconstructive, organ-preserving microsurgery in tubal infertility: still an alternative to invitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1359-61.
Klatsky PC, Tran ND, Caughey AB, Fujimoto VY. Fibroids and reproductive outcomes: a systematic literature review from conception to delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:357-66.
Sunkara SK, Khairy M, El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Coomarasamy A. The effect of intramural fibroids without uterine cavity involvement on the outcome of IVF treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:418-29.
Venetis CA, Papadopoulos SP, Campo R, Gordts S, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GS. Clinical implications of uterine congenital uterine anomalies; a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29:665-83.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Ask this paper
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (3)
- Use of laparoscopy in unexplained infertility 2012
- Laparoscopic evaluation of female infertility. 2011
- Role of hysterolaparoscopy for the evaluation of primary infertility: An experience from a tertiary care hospital 2017
Cited by (3)
References (18)
- Laparoscopic evaluation of female infertility. via openalex
- Role of hysterolaparoscopy for the evaluation of primary infertility: An experience from a tertiary care hospital via openalex
- Use of laparoscopy in unexplained infertility via openalex
- W2046616612 via openalex
- W2051696848 via openalex
- W2097780208 via openalex
- W2102659469 via openalex
- W2115571984 via openalex
- W1966854774 via openalex
- W2165672045 via openalex
- W2242399329 via openalex
- W2277286175 via openalex
- W2291960606 via openalex
- W2297953774 via openalex
- W2314900628 via openalex
- W2160648970 via openalex
- W2035657519 via openalex
- W2039452483 via openalex
Cited by (3)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK