The prevalence and impact of pain after day-care tubal ligation surgery
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary
This study found that pain and fatigue significantly impacted recovery and delayed return to normal activity for 85% of women after tubal ligation, with total pain experienced being the strongest predictor of recovery time.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Empirical data from controlled studies using standardized, reliable measures on the amount and quality of pain after laparoscopic tubal ligation and the consequences of this pain on the activities of daily living are extremely scarce. In a study of 54 women admitted to a day-care unit for this procedure, validated measures were utilized to assess the incidence, intensity and duration of pain after tubal ligation (McGill Pain Questionnaire) and the impact of pain on the activities of daily living (Modified Functional Assessment Inventory). Psychological measures (Brief Symptom Inventory, Kranz Health Opinion Survey, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) were employed to test their use as possible predictors for pain, analgesic usage and the time taken to resume a normal activity level after tubal ligation surgery. The results showed that pain is a significant problem after tubal ligation although pain rating scores over the 7-day study period were lower than those reported after major abdominal surgery. Eighty-five percent of our sample reported that pain and/or fatigue impacted on their recovery and contributed to an average delay of return to normal activity level of 4.4 days, not including the day of surgery. The psychological measures did not prove to be strong predictors of postoperative pain, time of return to normal activity level or analgesic usage. The most powerful predictor of return to normal activity was the total amount of pain experienced, as measured by the McGill Pain Questionnaire, during the 7 day post-operative period.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (1)
References (47)
- doi:10.1097/00006250-197907000-00014 via openalex
- W82160535 via openalex
- W208997410 via openalex
- W1439337461 via openalex
- W1484864026 via openalex
- W1531878972 via openalex
- W1679643334 via openalex
- W1968489226 via openalex
- W1973310624 via openalex
- W1976768212 via openalex
- W2016406854 via openalex
- W2016420287 via openalex
- W2030786596 via openalex
- W2031636413 via openalex
- W2033610772 via openalex
- W2038033886 via openalex
- W2038384784 via openalex
- W2045508061 via openalex
- W2061573624 via openalex
- W2062627073 via openalex
- W2063202439 via openalex
- W2066385330 via openalex
- W2070282799 via openalex
- W2073987790 via openalex
- W2083166801 via openalex
- W2084518320 via openalex
- W2089267566 via openalex
- W2114742772 via openalex
- W2129862157 via openalex
- W2134621022 via openalex
- W2213559082 via openalex
- W2220765569 via openalex
- W2274173830 via openalex
- W2280238818 via openalex
- W2294741445 via openalex
- W2297093608 via openalex
- W2329925658 via openalex
- W2411247045 via openalex
- W2411292536 via openalex
- W2414660161 via openalex
- W3139352095 via openalex
- W4211039380 via openalex
- W4295196781 via openalex
- W6666579460 via openalex
- W6696781336 via openalex
- W6714558958 via openalex
- W6758106715 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-09T06:31:01.691765+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK