Integrating single-cell and bulk transcriptomic perturbation resources reveals complementary therapeutic spaces for drug repurposing

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-29

This study introduces CDRPipe, a framework integrating single-cell and bulk transcriptomic perturbation data to identify complementary therapeutic spaces for drug repurposing, significantly expanding coverage and enabling high-confidence consensus candidate discovery.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-16 · read from full text

The authors developed CDRPipe, a computational framework that integrates microarray and single-cell RNA sequencing perturbation data to enhance drug repurposing predictions. By harmonizing datasets from the Connectivity Map and Tahoe-100M database, the study demonstrates that pseudo-bulk profiles derived from single-cell sources significantly outperform traditional microarray profiles in recovering annotated therapeutics. The research highlights that these distinct resources are highly complementary, with minimal overlap in identified drugs, thereby expanding therapeutic coverage when their predictions are combined. Relevance to endometriosis: The paper cites endometriosis as one of two case studies used to demonstrate the clinical relevance and technology-dependent patterns of its drug repurposing pipeline.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Transcriptome-based drug repurposing can accelerate therapeutic discovery, but is limited by fragmented resources, inconsistent quality control, and reliance on single perturbation databases. We developed CDRPipe (Computational Drug Repurposing Pipeline), a unified framework that interrogates disease signatures against drug perturbation signatures generated by distinct experimental technologies. Specifically, CDRPipe harmonizes microarray perturbation profiles from the Connectivity Map (CMap; 1,968 quality-filtered experiments) with pseudo-bulk profiles derived from large-scale single-cell RNA sequencing experiments in the Tahoe-100M database (56,827 experiments). CDRPipe standardizes preprocessing, computes rank-based connectivity scores, and evaluates significance using empirical null models. We applied CDRPipe to 233 curated disease signatures from GEO and CREEDS and evaluated performance using known drug-disease associations from Open Targets. Single-cell-derived pseudo-bulk profiles recovered more annotated therapeutics than microarray profiles (median recall 50.0% vs. 6.2%; Wilcoxon p < 10-11), thought these differences partly reflect differences in drug library composition and clinical annotation coverage. Importantly, the two resources were highly complementary, with only 3.5% overlap in recovered drugs, indicating that integrating predictions across independent perturbation resources expands therapeutic coverage and enables identification of high-confidence consensus candidates. Case studies in autoimmune disease and endometriosis further demonstrate that CDRPipe recovers clinically relevant therapies while revealing technology-dependent patterns of discovery. These results show that integrating heterogeneous transcriptomic perturbation resources improves the robustness and interpretability of transcriptional drug repurposing.
Full text 2,124 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Transcriptome-based drug repurposing can accelerate therapeutic discovery, but is limited by fragmented resources, inconsistent quality control, and reliance on single perturbation databases. We developed CDRPipe (Computational Drug Repurposing Pipeline), a unified framework that interrogates disease signatures against drug perturbation signatures generated by distinct experimental technologies. Specifically, CDRPipe harmonizes microarray perturbation profiles from the Connectivity Map (CMap; 1,968 quality-filtered experiments) with pseudo-bulk profiles derived from large-scale single-cell RNA sequencing experiments in the Tahoe-100M database (56,827 experiments). CDRPipe standardizes preprocessing, computes rank-based connectivity scores, and evaluates significance using empirical null models. We applied CDRPipe to 233 curated disease signatures from GEO and CREEDS and evaluated performance using known drug-disease associations from Open Targets. Single-cell-derived pseudo-bulk profiles recovered more annotated therapeutics than microarray profiles (median recall 50.0% vs. 6.2%; Wilcoxon p < 10⁻¹¹), thought these differences partly reflect differences in drug library composition and clinical annotation coverage. Importantly, the two resources were highly complementary, with only 3.5% overlap in recovered drugs, indicating that integrating predictions across independent perturbation resources expands therapeutic coverage and enables identification of high-confidence consensus candidates. Case studies in autoimmune disease and endometriosis further demonstrate that CDRPipe recovers clinically relevant therapies while revealing technology-dependent patterns of discovery. These results show that integrating heterogeneous transcriptomic perturbation resources improves the robustness and interpretability of transcriptional drug repurposing. One Sentence Summary Integrating drug perturbation resources from distinct transcriptomic platforms improves the robustness and accuracy of drug repurposing predictions. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

SciLite annotations

chemicals 44
sildenafil thalidomide glucose dexamethasone methotrexate hydrocortisone cypionate methotrexate celecoxib naproxen meloxicam dimethyl fumarate tazarotene clobetasol propionate corticosteroid budesonide pilocarpine leflunomide tofacitinib tofacitinib ibrutinib terfenadine irinotecan sunitinib afatinib nilotinib panobinostat levonorgestrel medrysone fenoprofen resveratrol clomipramine levonorgestrel progestin medroxyprogesterone acetate pentoxifylline fenoprofen resveratrol simvastatin valproic acid drospirenone progestin irinotecan corticosteroid
organisms 3
pentapus setosus rodents human

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-17T06:31:25.256261+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-09-17T06:06:11.458589+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-09-06T10:05:09.034756+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-12T06:43:03.944938+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Per Europe PMC