Expression of L-selectin ligand MECA-79 as a predictive marker of human uterine receptivity.
This study found that the presence of the L-selectin ligand MECA-79 on endometrial tissue is associated with successful pregnancy and absence predicts implantation failure in women with recurrent implantation failure.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This study investigated whether expression of L-selectin ligands recognized by the MECA-79 antibody in dated human endometrial biopsies could predict implantation outcomes in women with repeated implantation failure (RIF). Twenty fertile women and 20 RIF patients underwent endometrial sampling on day 6 post-ovulation, with immunohistochemistry used to assess MECA-79 ligand presence and biopsy timing standardized by Noyes criteria. All fertile women showed the ligand, whereas 5 RIF patients lacked the ligand and never achieved pregnancy after an average of five successive embryo transfers; among 15 ligand-positive RIF patients, 10 conceived, yielding predictive values of 100% positive predictive value and 87% negative predictive value (with sensitivity 50% and specificity 100%). The study’s main caveat is its small sample size and reliance on a single biopsy assessment for an inherently dynamic implantation process. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper discusses implantation failure mechanisms involving uterine receptivity, but it does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
5,571 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusions
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-07-28T06:14:09.330459+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00