Intro
Endometriosis (EMS) remains one of the most common gynecological conditions, and is
characterized by the implantation and growth of endometrial-like tissue outside of
the uterus. EMS is classified into extra-abdominal and abdominal lesions, ovarian
cysts, and deep EMS lesions based on the location of the ectopic endometrium
colonization. 1 EMS affects about 10% to 15% of reproductive-age women, with
many suffering from severe pelvic pain, heavy periods, and infertility. 2 , 3 The standard diagnostic
approach for EMS is laparoscopic surgery, in which the endometriotic lesion can be
obtained for pathological examination. Because of the invasive nature of
laparoscopic surgery, many patients are reluctant to participate. As a result, a
non-invasive diagnostic method that can diagnose EMS and reduce pain in the patient
is desired. 4
Despite the great efforts that have been made to identify sensitive biomarkers over
the past decades, there is still an urgent need to discover a definite diagnostic
biomarker for EMS.
Exosomes are small extracellular vesicles (EVs) with a diameter ranging in size from
60 to 150 nm. They mediate cell–cell communication by carrying biological
information, such as nucleic acids, proteins, lipids, and enzymes, between cells.
Exosomes are secreted by almost all types of cells and are widely distributed in
various body fluids, including blood, urine, ascites, saliva, and sputum. 5 , 6 The involvement of exosomes in
different types of diseases has been extensively studied, with a particular interest
on the use of exosomes in diagnostic and therapeutic applications. In recent years,
the potential role of exosomal components as valuable non-invasive diagnostic and/or
prognostic biomarkers has garnered more attention. Many studies have shown that
serum exosomal microRNAs (miRNAs) are frequently upregulated in inflammatory
disorders and cancers. 7 – 9 A recent study
reported that serum-derived exosomal miRNAs, such as miR-22-3p and miR-320a, are
significantly upregulated in the sera of patients with EMS. These molecules may
therefore serve as potential diagnostic biomarkers for EMS. 10 However, the
role of exosomes, particularly exosomal miRNAs derived from vaginal discharge
(leukorrhea), in patients with EMS has not been well studied.
The aim of our study was to investigate the potential utility of leukorrhea exosomal
miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for EMS. In this study, we used miRNA microarrays to
explore the differentially expressed exosomal miRNAs between exosomes derived from
the endometrial tissue of patients with EMS and those from individuals with other
gynecological conditions and/or healthy women. We then assessed the aberrantly
expressed exosomal miRNAs in leukorrhea, which provided a rationale for using these
molecules as biomarkers for EMS diagnosis.
Results
Overall, 11 patients were included in the EMS group. Of the 11 women in the
negative control group, 6 underwent hysteroscopic submucosal myomectomy and 5
had regular physical examinations. Exosomes were isolated from patients’
leukorrhea and EEC cell supernatants, which were previously cultured in media
supplemented with exosome-free FBS for 48 hours, by ultracentrifugation as
previously described. We used TEM, NanoSight analysis, and western blot analysis
to validate exosome purification. Representative TEM images show that the
majority of isolated exosomes were round-shaped and membrane-bound ( Figure 1a ). Particle size
analysis demonstrated that the diameter distribution of the exosomes ranged from
60 to 150 nm, with an average of 95.5 nm ( Figure 1b ). Through western blotting, we
examined protein expression of CD63 and HSP70 to confirm the presence of these
specific exosomal markers ( Figure 1c ).
Characterization of endometrial cells and leukorrhea-derived exosomes.
(a) Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of exosomes isolated
form endometrial cells. Scale bar = 20 nm by DLS and (b) Size
distribution analysis of isolated exosomes and (c) Western blot analysis
of exosome-specific markers CD63 and HSP70. Exosome depleted supernatant
(EDS) was included as a control.
To identify differentially expressed miRNAs in the exosomes derived from
individuals with and without EMS, we extracted miRNAs from the exosomes of both
groups and performed a miRNA microarray assay. Overall, 217 differentially
expressed miRNAs were identified from the microarray profiling ( Figure 2a–b ). We
validated the results of the microarray analysis by examining the expression
levels of 11 identified miRNAs in exosomes from EMS patients (n = 6) and
negative controls (n = 5) through RT-qPCR assays. The data show that
hsa-miR-202-3p/-5p expression levels were significantly higher in exosomes from
EMS patients compared with those from the controls ( P = 0.0194
(miR-202-3p), P = 0.004 (miR-202-5p), Figure 2c ). However, there was no
significant differences in the expression levels of the other exosomal miRNAs
between the EMS and negative control groups.
Exosomal microRNA (miRNA) microarray profiling and validation of
differentially expressed exosomal miRNAs. (a) Heatmap of differential
miRNAs in tissue-derived exosomes. (b) Volcano map of differential miRNA
genes in tissue-derived exosomes with 133 upregulated and 54
downregulated differential miRNAs and (c) Hsa-miR-202-3p/5p expression
levels were significantly increased in tissue exosomes with ectopic
endometrial tissue.
We aimed to determine if the exosomal miRNAs detected in endometrial cells could
also be identified in patients’ leukorrhea. This would suggest that they could
be used as non-invasive biomarkers for diagnosing EMS. Thus, we extracted
exosomal miRNAs from leukorrhea in patients with EMS (n = 11) and negative
controls (n = 11), then used RT-qPCR assays to examine the expression levels of
the 11 validated miRNAs. The data suggest that exosomal hsa-miR-202 expression
levels were significantly higher in leukorrhea from EMS patients than in that
from the negative control group ( P = 0.0126 (miR-202-3p),
P = 0.0238 (miR-202-5p), Figure 3 ).
Exosomal hsa-miR-202-3p/5p expression is significantly higher in
leukorrhea from patients with endometriosis.
Discussion
EMS remains one of the most common gynecological disorders, yet a non-invasive and
specific diagnostic biomarker is still urgently needed to improve early detection
and treatment. Exosomes can be detected in almost all types of body fluids,
including blood, urine, and leukorrhea, which has provided new opportunities to
develop less invasive diagnostic approaches for various diseases. Recent studies
have shown that exosomal contents, including miRNAs, can be detected in serum,
demonstrating their potential for use as less invasive biomarkers for disease
diagnosis. 12
MiRNAs, small non-coding RNAs that are about 22 to 24 nucleotides long, are highly
conserved across species and can regulate protein expression levels by targeting
specific mRNAs. 13 MiRNAs are involved in various biological processes, such as
cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. 14 These molecules can be highly
enriched in exosomes and associated with different biological effects. 15 A previous
study reported the role of exosomal miRNAs in relation to EMS
pathogenesis. 16 Numerous dysregulated and mutated miRNAs have been
identified in EMS, which can potentially control the aggressiveness and angiogenesis
associated with the disease. 17 Moreover, a recent study
reported different expression profiles of exosomal miRNAs in serum from patients
with EMS, suggesting their potential role as biomarkers. 10 However, exosomes and
exosomal miRNAs in leukorrhea from patients with EMS have not been well
characterized. Our data suggest that miRNAs derived from leukorrhea are more
representative of the microenvironmental conditions inside the uterus and adnexa
than those derived from circulating exosomes.
In the current study, we isolated and identified exosomes from both endometrial cells
and vaginal discharge (leukorrhea) from individuals with and without EMS. We first
analyzed the endometrial cell-derived exosomal miRNA expression profiles of the EMS
and negative control groups using miRNA microarray. The results revealed that 217
exosomal miRNAs were differentially expressed. We further validated the expression
levels of 11 exosomal miRNAs by performing RT-qPCR analysis, finding that
hsa-miR-202-3p and hsa-miR-202-5p were significantly upregulated in exosomes derived
from patients with EMS compared with negative controls. Next, we observed that both
hsa-miR-202-3p and hsa-miR-202-5p were also significantly upregulated in leukorrhea
exosomes from patients with EMS. Taken together, these observations suggest that
leukorrhea exosomal hsa-miR-202-3p and hsa-miR-202-5p may serve as potential
non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers for EMS.
Aberrant expression patterns of hsa-miR-202-3p and hsa-miR-202-5p can reportedly
contribute to the progression of different types of diseases, including cancers,
metabolic disorders, and cardiovascular disease. For example, hsa-miR202-3p was
reported to be involved in suppression of tumor cell proliferation, migration, and
invasion in gastric cancer. 18 , 19 Additionally, another study showed that high expression of
hsa-miR-202-5p inhibited the tumorigenic potential of colorectal carcinoma cells by
downregulating oncogenic SMARCC1. 20 However, another study stated
that higher blood miR-202-3p expression levels were associated with an increased
risk of essential hypertension. 21 Furthermore, in EMS, a study
on differentially expressed miRNAs in eutopic and ectopic endometria showed that
both hsa-miR-202-3p and hsa-miR-202-5p expression levels were upregulated in ectopic
endometrium. 22
Here, we assessed and compared differentially expressed exosomal miRNA levels in
normal and ectopic endometrial cells and further identified their expression in
leukorrhea-derived exosomes. Overall, our study demonstrates the possibility of
using leukorrhea-derived exosomal hsa-miR-202 as a biomarker for the non-invasive
diagnosis of EMS. However, because the number of patients and healthy subjects
included in this study was low, the expression profiles of exosomal miRNAs in
endometrial cells and leukorrhea need further verification by analyzing a larger
cohort. Furthermore, the implication of exosomal miR-202 in EMS, specifically the
mechanism underlying the pathogenesis of EMS mediated by exosomal miR-202, requires
further exploration. In addition, the diagnostic value of miR-202, along with any
correlations between exosomal miR-202 and clinicopathological features of EMS
patients, should be further investigated in a subsequent study.
Conclusions
The identification and characterization of leukorrhea-derived exosomes and exosomal
miRNAs could provide a basis for the future development of less/non-invasive
biomarkers for diagnosing EMS. However, future studies are needed to validate the
roles of such miRNAs in the development of EMS.
Materials|Methods
All samples were collected at Ningbo Women and Children’s Hospital from January
2019 to January 2020. For the EMS group, ectopic endometrial tissue and
leukorrhea samples were collected from patients diagnosed with EMS by
laparoscopy and histopathological examination. For the negative control group,
normal endometrial tissue and leukorrhea were obtained from normally cycling,
reproductive-age women who underwent hysteroscopic submucosal myomectomy and
women who had regular physical examinations (obtaining vaginal secretions only,
exclusion of malignancy and EMS by vaginal ultrasound and abdominal ultrasound,
ruling out dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, pelvic pain, or infertility). Inclusion
criteria: 1. No history of treatment with hormones or antibiotics within three
months before laparoscopic surgery; 2. No hepatitis, tuberculosis, tumors, or
other diseases. Exclusion criteria: 1. Treated with hormones or antibiotics
recently; 2. Has a serious disease; 3. Has any other gynecological disease, such
as inflammation of the reproductive system or tumors. All subjects included were
women who had regular menstrual cycles and no hormonal treatment for at least 3
months before sample collection. All vaginal secretions were obtained by
scraping with a cotton swab, then stored at −80°C. The study was approved by the
ethical committee of Ningbo Women and Children’s Hospital (approval no.
EC2019-037). The patients who gave tissue samples provided written informed
consent and the participants who donated leukorrhea samples provided verbal
informed consent before specimen collection.
Primary ectopic and normal endometrial cells were isolated from endometrial
tissues obtained from patients in the EMS and negative control groups. Briefly,
tissues were minced and digested in DMEM/F12 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham,
MA, USA) containing type IV collagenase and penicillin-streptomycin (Solarbio,
Beijing, China) for 1 hour at 37°C in a shaking incubator. The cell suspension
was centrifuged for 10 minutes at 400 × g and 4°C, then resuspended in fresh
DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Thermo Fisher
Scientific). Cells were separated by filtering through 200-μm mesh, then
resuspended and cultured in DMEM/F12 containing 10% FBS and 500 mg/mL
penicillin-streptomycin in a humidified incubator at 37°C with 5%
CO 2 .
Endometrial cell-derived exosomes were isolated form the cell supernatants of
normal endometrial cells (NECs), ectopic endometrial cells (EECs), and
leukorrhea by differential ultra-centrifugation, as previously
described. 11 The isolated exosome pellets were sent to Hibio
Technology Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, China) for transmission electron microscope
(TEM) observation, validation, and size distribution analysis.
Western blot analysis was performed to identify the exosomal markers CD63 and
heat-shock protein 70 (HSP70). Briefly, exosomes isolated from endometrial
tissue and leukorrhea were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), then
lysed with RIPA buffer supplemented with proteinase inhibitor (Beyotime
Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) and centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 10 minutes at
4°C. The exosomal protein concentration was determined using a BCA protein assay
kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Equal amounts of protein from each sample were
separated using 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(SDS-PAGE), then transferred onto polyvinyliene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. The
blots were incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight as follows:
anti-CD63 (1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology (CST), Danvers, MA, USA),
anti-HSP70 (1:1000; CST), and anti-GAPDH (1:3000; Bios, Shanghai, China). GAPDH
was used as a loading control. After incubation with horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for 2 hours at room temperature, the
protein bands were visualized with chemiluminescence reagents (CST), followed by
imaging on an electrophoresis gel imaging analysis system (D-Digital, Los
Angeles, CA, USA).
Extraction of exosomal miRNAs was performed using TRIzoI™ reagent (Life
Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s suggested
protocol. The concentration and quality of each RNA sample were determined by a
Nanodrop Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The extracted exosomal
miRNAs were sent for miRNA microarray profiling (Askomics Co., Shanghai,
China).
The isolated exosomal miRNAs were reverse transcribed using a miRNA cDNA
synthesis kit (CWBio, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. Forward primers for hsa-miR-202-3p (5′-AGAGGTATAGGGCATGGGAA-3′)
and hsa-miR-202-5p (5′- TTCCTATGCATATACTTCTTTG -3′) were purchased from Sangon
Biotech Co. (Shanghai, China), and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase
chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis was performed using the SYBR Green PCR Kit
(CWBio) on an Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-time PCR system and related software
(Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). U6 snRNA was used as an internal control
to normalize miRNA expression levels. Forward U6 primer:
5′-CGCTTCGGCAGCACATATAC-3′; Reverse U6 primer: 5′-TTCACGAATTTGCGTGTCAT-3′. All
samples were run in triplicate, with the average value used for fold change
values.
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software,
San Diego, CA, USA) and SPSS software (version 20.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY,
USA). Two-tailed Student’s t-tests were used to identify statistically
significant differences among the EMS and control groups. All experiments were
performed in triplicate and the results are expressed as mean ± standard
deviation (SD). A P -value <0.05 was considered statistically
significant.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.