Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery fellows' exposure to transgender health care.

OA: closed
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash+body, 2026-08-25

A 2015 survey of female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery fellows revealed minimal exposure to transgender patient care, indicating that didactic training increases trainee comfort in managing gender confirmation surgical complications.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-25 · read from full text

This cross-sectional survey assessed the clinical exposure and educational preparedness of female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery fellows regarding transgender health care. The study found that most respondents lacked experience with transgender patients or didactic training, yet those with even minimal instruction reported significantly higher comfort in managing post-surgical complications. The authors note that while fellows possess the technical skills for gender confirmation hysterectomies, their reluctance likely stems from psychosocial concerns rather than surgical deficits. Relevance to endometriosis: mentioned only tangentially as a benign indication for hysterectomy, which is contrasted with the anatomical simplicity of performing such procedures for gender confirmation surgery.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 4,130 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 4 sections · click to expand

Study

We administered an anonymous survey to FPMRS fellows during a fellows’ meeting at the 2015 American Urogynecologic Society Annual Meeting. In the absence of a validated tool, we developed the survey based on our experience with fellowship training and in caring for trans-gender patients. One of the authors (Y.G.-C.), who has expertise in GCS, reviewed the survey for content validity. Survey items included demographics as well as educational and clinical exposure to transgender health care. Fellows were asked about their ability to perform female-to-male (FTM) GCS, defined as hysterectomy with bilateral salpingooophorectomy, and comfort with counseling and caring for patients after GCS. We performed statistical analyses using software (SAS 9.4; SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). The institutional review board approved this study.

Results

In all, 76 of 97 fellows (78%) who received the survey responded. In 2015, there were 155 FPMRS fellows in training. Most fellows reported no experience with inpatient (84%) or outpatient (74%) care of transgender patients. At institutions where FTM GCS was performed, 88% of fellows believed that they would be able to provide a FTM hysterectomy with salpingo-oophorectomy after training, compared to 33% at institutions where FTM GCS was not performed ( P <.001). Most fellows (70%) reported that they had no didactics on transgender health care during fellowship. Fellows who had at least 1 hour of didactic training were significantly more likely to report that they would be comfortable managing surgical complications from FTM GCS (74%) compared to those who had not (47%; P =.047) ( Table ).

Objective

The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists stated that obstetrician-gynecologists “should be prepared to assist or refer transgender individuals with routine treatment and screening, as well as hormonal and surgical therapies.” 1 , 2 Surgical therapies include gender confirmation surgery (GCS) to phenotypically align a person’s sexual characteristics with their gender identity. A survey of obstetrician-gynecologists demonstrated that 80% did not receive training in residency on the care of transgender individuals. 3 Our objective was to assess exposure to patients who are transgender among female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) fellows.

Conclusion

We distributed our survey to a convenience sample of the 155 FPMRS fellows in 2015. Although we did not assess experience or interest in transgender health care before fellowship, our data are encouraging and suggest that minimal exposure to transgender health care may increase trainee comfort in providing surgical and medical management to trans-gender individuals. Our findings are consistent with a survey that showed medical students with more familiarity with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender terminology had more positive attitudes toward these patients. 4 The reticence that some fellows reported in caring for transgender individuals underscores the need for training programs to incorporate transgender health care into the educational curriculum, and is echoed by the American College of Physicians in their statement to include lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health care into medical education. 5 Fellows have completed obstetrics and gynecology residency and have the surgical skills to perform a hysterectomy, one of the most common operations performed by obstetrician-gynecologists. If the anatomy is normal, performing a hysterectomy for GCS is generally technically straightforward compared to hysterectomy for many other benign indications, such as fibroid uteri or endometriosis. While the reason for the trainees’ reluctance warrants further research, it can be postulated that it is because fellows do not feel adept at managing the psychosocial and health care needs of transgender individuals, as opposed to their lack of surgical skills, that they believe they would be unable to perform a hysterectomy for gender confirmation. Incorporating education in transgender health care into FPMRS fellowship may empower trainees in caring for patients who are transgender.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-13T09:25:22.628771+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-14T06:35:54.356137+00:00