Empathetic radiologic approaches in the era of AI: how can we improve the journey of patients with endometriosis?

review OA: closed CC0
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite+body, 2026-06-24

This paper reviews empathetic approaches in radiology, considering artificial intelligence, to enhance the patient experience for individuals with endometriosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

This paper is a narrative discussion focused on empathetic, patient-centered radiologic approaches in the era of AI, drawing on literature about patient communication, radiology report formats, waiting room experiences, anxiety related to MRI, and radiology communication practices more broadly. Across the reviewed topics, it highlights how affective states, perceived anxiety, and communication can shape patients’ experiences during diagnostic imaging. A key caveat stated by the authors is that no datasets were generated or analyzed, indicating the work is not an original empirical study. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper is explicitly titled and framed around improving the journey of patients with endometriosis, linking empathetic radiologic communication and imaging experience to endometriosis care.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 4,657 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Graphical Abstract Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. References Maulenkul T, Kuandyk A, Makhadiyeva D, Dautova A, Terzic M, Oshibayeva A, et al. Understanding the impact of endometriosis on women’s life: an integrative review of systematic reviews. BMC Womens Health. 2024;24(1):524. Lukas I, Kohl-Schwartz A, Geraedts K, Rauchfuss M, Wölfler MM, Häberlin F, et al. Satisfaction with medical support in women with endometriosis. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(11):e0208023. Vijan A, Bhagwanani A, Calle F, Brun-Vergara ML. Optimizing patient communication in radiology. Radiographics. 2023;43(7):e230002. Lauar MCV, Lauar GCV, Barbisan CC, Mello ACO, Benetti CCTP, Albuquerque KS, et al. Social media for radiologists: opportunities and challenges. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025;50(1):528–37. Rockall AG, Justich C, Helbich T, Vilgrain V. Patient communication in radiology: Moving up the agenda. Eur J Radiol. 2022;155:110464. Adler H, Lewis M, Ng CHM, Brooks C, Leonardi M, Mikocka-Walus A, et al. Social Media, Endometriosis, and Evidence-Based Information: An Analysis of Instagram Content. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12(1). Huber A, Bailey R. Designing Worthy Waiting Spaces: A Cross-Cultural Study of Waiting Room Features and Their Impact on Women’s Affective States. HERD. 2024;17(1):112–26. Itri JN. Patient-centered Radiology. Radiographics. 2015;35(6):1835–46. Fryburg DA. What’s playing in your waiting room? patient and provider stress and the impact of waiting room media. J Patient Exp. 2021;8:23743735211049880. Lai JC-Y, Amaladoss N. Music in waiting rooms: A literature review. HERD. 2022;15(2):347–54. Fudickar A, Konetzka D, Nielsen SML, Hathorn K. Evidence-based art in the hospital. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2022;172(9–10):234–41. Madl J, Janka R, Bay S, Rohleder N. MRI as a stressor: the psychological and physiological response of patients to MRI, influencing factors, and consequences. J Am Coll Radiol. 2022;19(3):423–32. van der Mee FAM, Ottenheijm RPG, Gentry EGS, Nobel JM, Zijta FM, Cals JWL, et al. The impact of different radiology report formats on patient information processing: a systematic review. Eur Radiol. 2024; Farinha MN, Semedo CS, Diniz AM, Herédia V. Individual and Contextual Variables as Predictors of MRI-Related Perceived Anxiety. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023;13(6). Dostál M, Jurasová K, Keřkovský M, Vaníček J, Kalas L, Látal L, et al. What factors affect a patient’s subjective perception of MRI examination. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):22731. Chamié LP. Ultrasound evaluation of deeply infiltrative endometriosis: technique and interpretation. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020;45(6):1648–58. Jiang S, Gao S, Tan Y, Yang Q, Zhou T, Zheng S, et al. Severe Pain and Postoperative Effects during Hysterosalpingography: A Meta-Analysis. Iran J Public Health. 2024;53(2):268–79. Navarro CL. Histerossalpingografia: Um Novo Olhar. 2020. Thieme Revinter. Street RL, Petrocelli JV, Amroze A, Bergelt C, Murphy M, Wieting JM, et al. How communication “failed” or “saved the day”: counterfactual accounts of medical errors. J Patient Exp. 2020;7(6):1247–54. Hickson GB, Entman SS. Physician practice behavior and litigation risk: evidence and opportunity. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;51(4):688–99. Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions Conceptualization: M. C. V. L., L. P. C.;Data curation: M. C. V. L., B. C. O.; A, L. N.;Investigation: M. C. V. L.; B. C. O.; A.L.N.;Writing-original draft preparation: M. C. V. L.;Writing-review and editing: B. C. O.; A.L.N.; L. P. C.;Figures and tables editing: M. C. V. L.;Project administration: M. C. V. L.;Supervision: L. P. C. Corresponding authors Ethics declarations Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Additional information Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Lauar, M.C.V., Oliveira, B.C., De Nicola, A.L.A. et al. Empathetic radiologic approaches in the era of AI: how can we improve the journey of patients with endometriosis?. Abdom Radiol 51, 408–416 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-05052-1 Received: Revised: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-05052-1

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (2)

Cited by (1)

References (20)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-22T06:09:51.966504+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-08-22T06:06:52.139268+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-22T06:23:50.750314+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK