Correlation between Estrogen Receptorβ (ERβ), Neurofilament Protein (NF), and Protein Gene Product 9.5 (PGP9.5) Expressions as a Marker of Pain on Adenomyosis Etiopathogenesis

In: Majalah Kedokteran Bandung · 2021 · vol. 53(4) , pp. 215–222 · doi:10.15395/mkb.v53n4.2363 · W4210336767
article OA: gold CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-19

Adenomyosis tissues showed higher expressions of ERβ, NF, and PGP 9.5, which were significantly correlated and positively associated with pain in adenomyosis pathogenesis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-09 · read from full text

The provided text does not include the actual research content of the paper (e.g., study design, patient population, methods, results, or stated limitations); instead it contains repeated journal platform upgrade and cybersecurity recovery notices unrelated to scientific findings. Because the study details are missing, the key finding and any explicit caveats cannot be determined from the supplied material. This paper is centrally about adenomyosis — it is titled as investigating correlations among ERβ, NF, and PGP9.5 as markers related to adenomyosis etiopathogenesis of pain, though the underlying results are not included in the text you provided.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Adenomyosis is a pathological condition characterized by the presence of endometrial glands and stroma within the myometrium. Endometrial like cells development was influenced by local inflammatory reactions, increases local estradiol due to asynchromatized estrogen synthesis (ERβ) and then stimulated to proliferation and fibrosis, are also irritation on small nerve fibers in women with painful characterized symptoms on adenomyosis. There are expressions of neurofilament protein (NF) and protein gene product 9.5 (PGP 9.5) is a highly specific pan-neuronal marker for microfilament nerve fibers and is related to presenting pain with adenomyosis symptoms. A retrospective immunohistochemical study of thirty samples histopathological of adenomyosis as study groups and 30 with control groups between 25–49 ages which were established at Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital and the satellites in April 2014–May 2015. This case-control analyzed ERβ, NF, and PGP 9.5 expressions compared and correlation between study groups and controls. The results showed there were significant differences in expression of ERβ, NF, and PGP 9.5 on adenomyosis higher than the control study (p<0.05). The intensity was higher and very strong into the study groups (p6(sensitivity 66.7%; specificity 70%), NF>3 (sensitivity 93%; specificity 46%), PGP 9.5>4 (sensitivity 90%; specificity 67%). Odds Ratio (CI 95%) ERβ>6= 4.67; NF >3=12.25; PGP 9.5 >4=24.75 (p<0.001). The value of histoscore of ERβ and PGP9.5 have correlates to adenomyosis, the differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). The conclusion were that the adenomyosis had higher ERβ, NF, and PGP 9.5 expressions. There are simultant correlates and positive values between ERβ, NF, and PGP9.5 based on etiophatogenesis of pain on adenomyosis.
Full text 4,987 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Faculty of Medicine — Universitas Padjadjaran Our journal platform is currently undergoing a major upgrade to a stable and updated OJS 3 version, post-migration validation, security checks, and system testing. Completing the OJS migration, validating migrated data, and checking the website after migration. The upgrade and post-migration validation process is still ongoing. Due to the large volume of journal data, we require approximately three additional days to continue the remaining work. The upgrade and post-migration validation process is still ongoing. Due to the large volume of journal data, we require approximately three additional days to continue the remaining work. Security and Service Notice: Our journal website recently experienced a cybersecurity incident involving unauthorized access. The technical team is currently restoring the system, reviewing and strengthening its security, and performing a major platform upgrade from OJS 2 to OJS 3 to provide a safer, more stable, and more reliable service. The migration is still in progress and requires additional time to complete. After the migration, the technical team must also verify the migrated data, review journal settings, test article and file access, check user accounts, and confirm that the website functions correctly before reopening it to the public. The migration and post-migration website checks are still ongoing. The technical team is continuing the upgrade to a stable and updated OJS 3 version, data validation, system testing, security checks, and final website verification before the platform can be reopened safely. Due to the large amount of journal data, this process requires additional time to ensure that all migrated records, files, users, and journal pages are properly checked. The process has not yet been completed. We therefore require approximately three additional days to continue the stable OJS 3 upgrade, data validation, system testing, security checks, and final website verification. We will provide the next progress update on Thursday, 9 July 2026. Please note that this date is an update checkpoint and not a guaranteed reopening date. During this recovery period, manuscript submissions, revised manuscripts, reviewer reports, and supporting documents may be sent by email to the appropriate journal editorial office listed below. If the upgrade, migration, and website checks are not yet complete by Thursday, we will provide the latest status and a revised estimate. Our journal website recently experienced a cybersecurity incident involving unauthorized access. The technical team is currently restoring the system, reviewing and strengthening its security, and performing a major platform upgrade from OJS 2 to OJS 3 to provide a safer, more stable, and more reliable service. The migration is still in progress and requires additional time to complete. After the migration, the technical team must also verify the migrated data, review journal settings, test article and file access, check user accounts, and confirm that the website functions correctly before reopening it to the public. The migration and post-migration website checks are still ongoing. The technical team is continuing the upgrade to a stable and updated OJS 3 version, data validation, system testing, security checks, and final website verification before the platform can be reopened safely. Due to the large amount of journal data, this process requires additional time to ensure that all migrated records, files, users, and journal pages are properly checked. The process has not yet been completed. We therefore require approximately three additional days to continue the stable OJS 3 upgrade, data validation, system testing, security checks, and final website verification. We will provide the next progress update on Thursday, 9 July 2026. Please note that this date is an update checkpoint and not a guaranteed reopening date. During this recovery period, manuscript submissions, revised manuscripts, reviewer reports, and supporting documents may be sent by email to the appropriate journal editorial office listed below. If the upgrade, migration, and website checks are not yet complete by Thursday, we will provide the latest status and a revised estimate. Extended period: 3 additional days Updated estimated time remaining 03Days 00Hours 00Minutes 00Seconds Extended period: 3 additional days, 11:59 PM WIB. This is an update checkpoint, not a guaranteed reopening date. Upgrade in ProgressStable OJS 3 migration Data ValidationLarge journal data checking System TestingSecurity & website verification Journal Contact Information Majalah Kedokteran Bandung [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Althea Medical Journal [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] International Journal of Integrated Health Sciences [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Jurnal Anestesi Perioperatif [email protected]

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (9)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK