Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with conventional abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy

Other OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 10 in-corpus citations
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

This study compared outcomes of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy to conventional abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Hysterectomy Hysterectomy Hysterectomy Adult Female Humans Hysterectomy, Vaginal Hysterectomy, Vaginal Hysterectomy, Vaginal Laparoscopy Length of Stay Middle Aged Morphine Morphine Ovariectomy Ovariectomy Time Factors

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (3)

Cited by (10)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:59:20.378211+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-10T06:25:47.132674+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK