Recovery from vaginal hysterectomy compared with laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This study found no difference in short-term recovery between patients undergoing standard vaginal hysterectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, despite a longer operative time for the latter.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate short-term recovery of vaginal hysterectomy with those of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy performed in a prospective, randomized multicentric study. STUDY DESIGN: Eighty patients referred for hysterectomy for benign pathology were randomized to either vaginal hysterectomy (40 patients) or laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (40 patients). Inclusion criteria were uterine size larger than 280 g and one or more of the following: previous pelvic surgery, history of pelvic inflammatory disease, moderate or severe endometriosis, concomitant adnexal masses, and indication for adnexectomy. No upper limit of uterine size was set. All the laparoscopic and the vaginal hysterectomies were done under endotracheal general anesthesia. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in terms of patient's age, parity, postmenopausal state, indication for surgery and mean uterine weight between the 2 groups. Laparoconversion was performed in three women in the laparoscopic group. Operative time was significantly shorter in the vaginal versus the laparoscopic groups 108+/-35 and 160+/-50 respectively (p<0.001). The use of paracetamol, non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opioid during hospitalization were similar in the 2 groups. There was no difference in the 1st day hemoglobin level drop, time of passing gas and stool, or hospital stay between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: In contrast with earlier reports, there was no difference in short-term recovery between patients undergoing vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy. No advantage was found performing laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy in comparison with the standard vaginal hysterectomy.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (3)
- Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States 1982
- Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study 1999
- Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo‐ophorectomy with conventional abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo‐ophorectomy 1993
Cited by (2)
References (18)
- Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo‐ophorectomy with conventional abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo‐ophorectomy via openalex
- Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States via openalex
- Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study via openalex
- W2012909860 via openalex
- W2017952546 via openalex
- W2036230960 via openalex
- W2041674509 via openalex
- W2049446992 via openalex
- W2070080301 via openalex
- W2092321358 via openalex
- W2100670602 via openalex
- W2144738065 via openalex
- W2155873935 via openalex
- W2403635289 via openalex
- W2478511312 via openalex
- W3023490311 via openalex
- W1986242931 via openalex
- W1996884114 via openalex
Cited by (2)
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-01T06:07:04.264727+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:13:24.901228+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK